245
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Comparing terrestrial laser scanners’ ability to measure tree height and diameter in a managed forest environment

ORCID Icon, , &

References

  • Bauwens S, Bartholomeus H, Calders K, Lejeune P. 2016. Forest inventory with terrestrial LiDAR: a comparison of static and hand-held mobile laser scanning. Forests. 7(12):127. doi:10.3390/f7060127.
  • Beh J, Kanowski PJ, Greene RSB, Brack CL. 2016. Predicting soil depth using simple ground-based measurements of stem shape and taper in the butt swell section of individual Pinus radiata trees. Australian Forestry. 79(2):114–121. doi:10.1080/00049158.2016.1152623.
  • Bosse M, Zlot R, Flick P. 2012. Zebedee: design of a spring-mounted 3-D range sensor with application to mobile mapping. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 28(5):1104–1119. doi:10.1109/TRO.2012.2200990.
  • CloudCompare (version 2.9.1) [GPL software]. 2017. [accessed 2020 Feb 27]. Available from: http://www.cloudcompare.org/
  • Douglas ES, Martel J, Li Z, Howe GA, Hewawasam K, Marshall RA, Schaaf CL, Cook TA, Newnham GJ, Strahler AH, et al.. 2015. Finding leaves in the forest: the Dual-Wavelength Echidna Lidar. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters. 12(4):776–780. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2014.2361812.
  • Hnatiuk R, Tickle P, Wood M, Howell C. 2003. Defining Australian forests. Australian Forestry. 66(3):176–183. doi:10.1080/00049158.2003.10674909.
  • Howe GA, Hewawasam K, Douglas ES, Martel J, Li Z, Strahler AH, Schaaf C, Cook TA, Chakrabarti S. 2015. Capabilities and performance of dual-wavelength Echidna® lidar. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing. 9(1):095979. doi:10.1117/1.JRS.9.095979.
  • Li Z, Jupp DL, Strahler AH, Schaaf CB, Howe G, Hewawasam K, Douglas ES, Chakrabarti S, Cook T, Paynter I, et al. 2016. Radiometric calibration of a dual-wavelength, full-waveform terrestrial Lidar. Sensors. 16(3):313. doi:10.3390/s16030313.
  • Liang X, Kankare V, Hyyppä J, Wang Y, Kukko A, Haggrén H, Yu X, Kaartinen H, Jaakkola A, Guan F, et al. 2016. Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 115:63–77. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.006.
  • Liu G, Wang J, Dong P, Chen Y, Liu Z. 2018. Estimating individual tree height and diameter at breast height (DBH) from terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data at plot level. Forests. 9(7):398. doi:10.3390/f9070398.
  • Newnham GJ, Armston JD, Calders K, Disney MI, Lovell JL, Schaaf CB, Strahler AH, Danson FM. 2015. Terrestrial laser scanning for plot-scale forest measurement. Current Forestry Reports. 1(4):239–251. doi:10.1007/s40725-015-0025-5.
  • Rapidlasso. 2020. Rapidlasso GmbH. Gilching (Germany): Rapidlasso GmbH. [accessed 2020 Feb 27]. Available from: https://rapidlasso.com/
  • Roussel J-R, Casperson J, Béland M, Thomas S, Achim A. 2017. Removing bias from LiDAR-based estimates of canopy height: accounting for the effects of pulse density and footprint size. Remote Sensing of Environment. 198:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.05.032.
  • RWG#2 (Research Working Group #2). 1999. Code of Forest Mensuration Practice: a guide to good tree measurement practice in Australia and New Zealand. In: Wood, Turner and Brack, editors. Canberra (Australia): Australian National University.  Available from: https://fennerschool-associated.anu.edu.au/mensuration/rwg2/code/
  • Schreuder HT, Gregoire TG, Wood GB. 1993. Sampling methods for multiresource forest inventory. New York (US): John Wiley and Sons, Inc; p. 445.
  • Strahler AH, Jupp DLB, Woodcock CE, Schaaf CB, Yao T, Zhao F, Yang X, Lovell JL, Culvenor DS, Newnham GJ, et al. 2008. Retrieval of forest structural parameters using a ground-based lidar instrument (Echidna ®). Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 34(sup2):S426–S440. doi:10.5589/m08-046.
  • Trotcha J, Krucek M, Vrska T, Kral K. 2017. 3D Forest: an application for descriptions of three-dimensional forest structures using terrestrial LiDAR. PLOS One. 12(5). [accessed 2020 Feb 27. Available from doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176871.
  • Vanclay JK, Henry NB. 1988. Assessing site productivity of indigenous cypress pine forest in southern Queensland. Commonwealth Forestry Review. 67:53–64.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.