Hollow occurrence and tree spacing in Eucalyptus tereticornis

References

• Adkins MF. 2006. A burning issue: using fire to accelerate tree hollow formation in Eucalyptus species. Australian Forestry. 69(2):107–113. doi:10.1080/00049158.2006.10676236.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Weather News. 2002. Widespread severe storms in NE NSW, SE and central eastern Qld, 2002 Dec 24. [accessed 2021 Aug 31]. http://www.australianweathernews.com/news/2002/12/20021224.htm
   Google Scholar
• Blakey RV, Law BS, Kingsford RT, Stoklosa J, Tap P, Williamson K, Minderman J. 2016. Bat communities respond positively to large-scale thinning of forest regrowth. Journal of Applied Ecology. 53(6):1694–1703. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland DJ, Brooker MIH, Chippendale GM, Hall N, Hyland BPM, Johnston RD, Kleinig DA, Turner JD. 1984. Forest trees of Australia. Melbourne (Australia): CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Meteorology. 2021. Severe storm archive. [accessed 2021 Aug 31]. http://www.bom.gov.au/australia/stormarchive/
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy M, Palmer G, Glencross K, Nichols JD, Smith RGB. 2012. Stocking and intensity of thinning affect log size and value in Eucalyptus pilularis. Forest Ecology and Management. 264:220–227. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook RD, Weisberg S. 1997. Graphics for assessing the adequacy of regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 92(438):490–499. doi:10.1080/01621459.1997.10474002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook RD, Weisberg S. 2004. ARC Software version 1.06. [accessed 2022 Oct 21] https://www.stat.umn.edu/arc/software.html
   Google Scholar
• Cook RD, Weisberg S. 2009. Applied regression including computing and graphics. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins HC. 1958. The management of tropical high forest, with special reference to Uganda. Oxford (UK): University of Oxford. Imperial Forestry Institute Paper 34.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis MV, Taylor JE, Rhind SG. 2022. Creating entrances to tree cavities attracts hollow‐dependent fauna: proof of concept. Restoration Ecology. doi:10.1111/rec.13713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyre TJ. 2005. Hollow-bearing trees in large glider habitat in south-east Queensland, Australia: abundance, spatial distribution and management. Pacific Conservation Biology. 11(1):23–37. doi:10.1071/PC050023.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester DI, Medhurst JL, Wood M, Beadle CL, Valencia JC. 2010. Growth and physiological responses to silviculture for producing solid-wood products from Eucalyptus plantations: an Australian perspective. Forest Ecology and Management. 259(9):1819–1835. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.08.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox JC, Bi H, Ades PK. 2007. Spatial dependence and individual-tree growth models: I. characterising spatial dependence. Forest Ecology and Management. 245(1–3):10–19. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.025.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons P, Lindenmayer D. 2002. Tree hollows and wildlife conservation in Australia. Melbourne (Australia): CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB, Barry SC, Tanton MT. 2000. Hollow formation in eucalypts from temperate forests in southeastern Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology. 6(3):218–228. doi:10.1071/PC000217.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB, Barry SC, Tanton MT. 2002. Hollow selection by vertebrate fauna in forests of southeastern Australia and implications for forest management. Biological Conservation. 103(1):1–12. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00109-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldingay RL. 2009. Characteristics of tree hollows used by Australian birds and bats. Wildlife Research. 36(5):394–409. doi:10.1071/WR08172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalves L, Law B, Brassil T, Waters C, Toole I, Tap P. 2018. Ecological outcomes for multiple taxa from silvicultural thinning of regrowth forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 425:177–188. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham MH. 2003. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology. 84(11):2809–2815. doi:10.1890/02-3114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grants Lands Office.1991. Wilson Park: draft assessment 91-1380. Mimeo. Grafton (Australia): Grafton Lands Office.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths SR, Lentini PE, Semmens K, Robert KA. 2022. “Set and forget” does not work when it comes to fissure roosts carved into live trees for bats. Restoration Ecology. doi:10.1111/rec.13751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper MJ, McCarthy MA, van der Ree R. 2005. The abundance of hollow-bearing trees in urban dry sclerophyll forest and the effect of wind on hollow development. Biological Conservation. 122(2):181–192. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper MJ, McCarthy MA, van der Ree R, Fox JC. 2004. Overcoming bias in ground-based surveys of hollow-bearing trees using double-sampling. Forest Ecology and Management. 190(2–3):291–300. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2003.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner GJ, Baker PJ, MacNally R, Cunningham SC, Thomson JR, Hamilton F. 2010. Forest structure, habitat and carbon benefits from thinning floodplain forests: managing early stand density makes a difference. Forest Ecology and Management. 259(3):286–293. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inions GB, Tanton MT, Davey SM. 1989. Effect of Fire on the Availability of Hollows in Trees Used by the Common Brushtail Possum, Trichosurus Vulpecula Kerr, 1792, and the Ringtail Possum, Pseudocheirus Peregrinus Boddaerts, 1785. Wildlife Research. 16(4):449–458. doi:10.1071/WR9890449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs MR. 1955. Growth habits of the Eucalypts. Canberra (Australia): Commonwealth Forestry and Timber Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Jay VA, Dillon A. 2016. Modelling the outcomes of different silvicultural approaches in the private native forests of north-eastern New South Wales. Australian Forestry. 79(2):85–95. doi:10.1080/00049158.2015.1123392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay A, Sharpe D, Nichols D, Vanclay J. 2009. Sustainable private native forestry: a review of timber production, biodiversity and soil and water indicators, and their applicability to northeast NSW. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Publication No. 09/022. Wagga Wagga (Australia): RIRDC; 78+viii p.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings SB. 1999. Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry. 72(1):59–74. doi:10.1093/forestry/72.1.59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch A, Munks S, Driscoll D. 2008. The use of hollow-bearing trees by vertebrate fauna in wet and dry Eucalyptus obliqua forest, Tasmania. Wildlife Research. 35(8):727–746. doi:10.1071/WR08007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch AJ, Munks SA, Driscoll D, Kirkpatrick JB. 2008. Does hollow occurrence vary with forest type? A case study in wet and dry Eucalyptus obliqua forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 255(12):3938–3951. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law BS, Chidel M, Turner G. 2000. The use by wildlife of paddock trees in farmland. Pacific Conservation Biology. 6(2):130–143. doi:10.1071/PC000130.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham RB, Nix HA, Tanton MT, Smith AP. 1991. Predicting the abundance of hollow-bearing trees in montane forests of southeastern Australia. Austral Ecology. 16(1):91–98. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1991.tb01484.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mackowski CM. 1984. The ontogeny of hollows in blackbutt (Eucalyptus pilularis) and its relevance to the management of forests for possums, gliders and timber. In: Smith AP, Hume ID, editors. Possums and gliders. Sydney (Australia): Surrey Beatty; p. 553–567.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire O. 2009. Interpretation of high resolution digital aerial photography in a digital 3D environment to map vegetation communities from a pre-existing classification. In Bryn A, Dramstad W, Fjellstad W, editors. Mapping and monitoring of Nordic vegetation and landscapes. Vol. 1(10). Norsk Institutt for Skog og Landskap; p. 71–74.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine CA, Peterson A, Norman P. 2005. The South East Queensland forests agreement: lessons for biodiversity conservation. Pacific Conservation Biology. 11(1):3–13. doi:10.1071/PC050003.
   Google Scholar
• Munks S, Wapstra M, Corkrey R, Otley H, Miller G, Walker B. 2007. The occurrence of potential tree hollows in the dry eucalypt forests of south-eastern Tasmania, Australia. Australian Zoologist. 34(1):22–36. doi:10.7882/AZ.2007.002.
   Google Scholar
• National Parks Association. 1984. Wilson Park – big Scrub remnant under threat? Mimeo, Nov 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner L, Ellis M, Taylor JE. 2014. Hollow occurrence and abundance varies with tree characteristics and among species in temperate woodland Eucalyptus. Austral Ecology. 39(2):145–157. doi:10.1111/aec.12052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueegger N. 2017. Artificial tree hollow creation for cavity-using wildlife – trialling an alternative method to that of nest boxes. Forest Ecology and Management. 405:404–412. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan M. 2013. Adaptive silviculture in regrowth eucalypt forests in Victoria and the implications for water, wood, wildlife and wildfire. Australian Forestry. 76(3–4):173–182. doi:10.1080/00049158.2013.842461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmona J, Dixon KM, Banks SC. 2018. The effects of fire history on hollow-bearing tree abundance in montane and subalpine eucalypt forests in southeastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management. 428:93–103. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.06.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelhaas MJ, Kramer K, Peltola H, van der Werf DC, Wijdeven SMJ. 2007. Introducing tree interactions in wind damage simulation. Ecological Modelling. 207(2–4):197–209. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slee AV, Brooker MIH, Duffy SM, West JG. 2020. Eucalyptus tereticornis subsp. tereticornis. Eucalypts of Australia Euclid. 4th ed. Canberra (Australia): Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research. [accessed 2022 Oct 21]. https://apps.lucidcentral.org/euclid/text/entities/eucalyptus_tereticornis_subsp._tereticornis.htm
   Google Scholar
• Soderquist TR, MacNally R. 2000. The conservation value of mesic gullies in dry forest landscapes: mammal populations in the box–ironbark ecosystem of southern Australia. Biological Conservation. 93(3):281–291. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00153-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ståhl G, Ringvall A, Lämås T. 1997. Guided transect sampling: an outline of the principle. Umeå (Sweden): Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet. Arbetsrapport 19.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhl G, Ringvall A, Lämås T. 2000. Guided transect sampling for assessing sparse populations. Forest Science. 46:108–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry W, Goldingay RL, van der Ree R. 2021. Can chainsaw carved hollows provide an effective solution to the loss of natural tree cavities for arboreal mammals? Forest Ecology and Management. 490:119122. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todarello P, Chalmers A. 2007. The characteristics of five species of hollow-bearing trees on the New South Wales central coast. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales. 128:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Travers SK, Dorrough J, Oliver I, Somerville M, Watson CJ, McNellie MJ. 2018. Using tree hollow data to define large tree size for use in habitat assessment. Australian Forestry. 81(3):186–195. doi:10.1080/00049158.2018.1502736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treby DL. 2013. Hollow-bearing trees as a habitat resource along an urbanisation gradient [ PhD thesis]. Gold Coast (Australia): School of Environment, Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Treby DL, Castley JG. 2015. Distribution and abundance of hollow-bearing trees in urban forest fragments. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(3):655–663. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vearing L. 2010. The formation of the hollows in the box and ironbark forests of Central Victoria. Eucalyptus Study Group Newsletter. 50:2–9. https://anpsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/eucSG50.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vesk PA, Nolan R, Thomson JR, Dorrough JW, MacNally R. 2008. Time lags in provision of habitat resources through revegetation. Biological Conservation. 141(1):174–186. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West PW. 2015. Sampling theory. In: Tree and forest measurement. Berlin, Heidelberg (Germany): Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14708-6_10.
   Google Scholar
• Westerhuis EL, Schlesinger CA, Nano CE, Morton SR, Christian KA. 2019. Characteristics of hollows and hollow-bearing trees in semi-arid river red gum woodland and potential limitations for hollow-dependent wildlife. Austral Ecology. 44(6):995–1004. doi:10.1111/aec.12765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitford KR. 2002. Hollows in jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) and marri (Corymbia calophylla) trees: I. Hollow sizes, tree attributes and ages. Forest Ecology and Management. 160(1–3):201–214. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00446-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley LA, Murphy BP, Radford IJ, Westaway J, Woinarski JC. 2018. Cyclones, fire, and termites: the drivers of tree hollow abundance in northern Australia’s mesic tropical savanna. Forest Ecology and Management. 419:146–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormington P, Lamb D. 1999. Tree hollow development in wet and dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest in south-east Queensland, Australia. Australian Forestry. 62:336–345. doi:10.1080/00049158.1999.10674801.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Zhang S, Yang G, Tang Y, Baskin J, Baskin C, Yang L. 2009. Abundance and distribution of cavity trees in an old-growth subtropical montane evergreen broad-leaved forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 39:2234–2245.
   Google Scholar