Farmer Identity in Multifunctional Landscapes: using a collective identity construct to explore the nature and impact of occupational identity

REFERENCES

• Abrams, J. & Bliss, J.C. (2013) ‘Amenity landownership, land use change, and the re-creation of “working landscapes”’, Society & Natural Resources 26(7), pp. 845–59. doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.719587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmore, R.D., Deaux, K. & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004) ‘An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality’, Psychological Bulletin 130(1), pp. 80–114. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, A.P., Willock, J., Toma, L. & Hall, C. (2011) ‘Utilising a farmer typology to understand farmer behaviour towards water quality management: Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Scotland’, Journal of Environmental Planning & Management 54(4), pp. 477–94. doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.515880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, N., Wilkinson, R. & Karunaratne, K. (2005) Understanding rural Victoria, Department of Primary Industries, Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnet, I., Potter, C. & Simmons, E. (2003) ‘Landscape change in the multi-functional countryside: a biographical analysis of farmer decision-making in the English High Weald’, Landscape Research 28(4), pp. 349–64. doi:10.1080/0142639032000150112
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P.J. & Stets, J.E. (2009) Identity theory, Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, M., Tieman, G., Bekessy, S., Budge, T., Mercer, D., Coote, M. & Morocombe, J. (2006) Change and continuity in peri-urban Australia. State of the peri-urban regions: a review of the literature, RMIT University, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, M.S. & Lee, R.G. (eds). (1990) Occupational community and identity among Pacific Northwestern loggers: implications for adapting to economic changes, Westview Press, Boulder.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, A., Byron, I. & MacKay, J. (2005) ‘Integrating socio-economic and biophysical data to underpin collaborative watershed management’, Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41(3), pp. 549–63. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03754.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, A. & De Lacy, T. (1996) ‘Landcare in Australia: does it make a difference?’, Journal of Environmental Management 46(2), pp. 119–37. doi:10.1006/jema.1996.0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, A., McDonald, S., Mendham, E. & Sample, R. (2008) Understanding the social drivers for natural resource management in the Wimmera region, Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, A. & Mendham, E. (2011) ‘Bridging the gap between policy and management of natural resources’, in Pannell, D. & Vanclay, F. (eds) Changing land management: adoption of new practices by rural landholders, CSIRO, Melbourne, pp. 377–97.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, A. & Mendham, E. (2012) The social drivers of natural resource management in the Wimmera region, Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, A. & Race, D. (2012) ‘Management of Tasmania's riparian zones by rural landholders’, in Lefroy, T., Curtis, A., Jakeman, A. & Mckee, J. (eds) Landscape logic: integrating science for landscape management, CSIRO, Collingwood, pp. 69–81.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, A. & Robertson, A. (2003) ‘Understanding landholder management of river frontages: the Goulburn Broken’, Ecological Management & Restoration 4(1), pp. 45–54. doi:10.1046/j.1442-8903.2003.t01-1-00137.x
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D.A. (1978) Mail and telephone surveys, John Wiley & Sons, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Emtage, N., Herbohn, J. & Harrison, S. (2006) ‘Landholder typologies used in the development of natural resource management programs in Australia—a review’, Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 13(2), pp. 79–94.
   Google Scholar
• Gasson, R. (1973) ‘Goals and values of farmers’, Journal of Agricultural Economics 24, pp. 521–42. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.1973.tb00952.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H., Haggerty, J.H. & Byorth, P.A. (2007) ‘Ranch ownership change and new approaches to water resource management in Southwestern Montana: implications for fisheries’, Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43(4), pp. 990–1003. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00081.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H., Haggerty, J.H. & Travis, W.R. (2006) ‘Ranchland ownership change in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem, 1990–2001: implications for conservation’, Society & Natural Resources 19(8), pp. 743–58. doi:10.1080/08941920600801181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberkorn, G., Kelson, S., Tottenham, R. & Magpantay, C. (2004) Country matters: social atlas of rural & regional Australia, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Australian Government, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, J., Hulsink, W. & Grin, J. (2012) ‘Care farms in the Netherlands: an underexplored example of multifunctional agriculture-toward an empirically grounded, organization-theory-based typology’, Rural Sociology 77(4), pp. 569–600. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, L. (2002) ‘Smallholding, hobby-farming, and commercial farming: ethical identities and the production of farming spaces’, Environment and Planning A 34, pp. 2055–70. doi:10.1068/a34261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. (1986) ‘Mulga, gidgee and turkey bush: environmental perception by West Queensland’, in Sattler, P. (ed.) The Mulga Lands, Royal Society of Queensland, Brisbane, pp. 45–9.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. ' Day, P. (1995) ‘Identity, lifestyle and survival: value orientations of South Australian pastoralists’, The Rangeland Journal 17(2), pp. 193–212. doi:10.1071/RJ9950193
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. (2006) ‘Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda’, Journal of Rural Studies 22(2), pp. 142–60. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansujwicz, J.S., Calhoun, A.J.K., Leahy, J.E. & Lilieholm, R.J. (2013) ‘Using mixed methods to develop a frame-based private landowner typology’, Society & Natural Resources 26(8), pp. 945–61. doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.729294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongeneel, R.A., Polman, N.B.P. & Slangen, L.H.G. (2008) ‘Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional?’, Land Use Policy 25(1), pp. 81–94. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendra, A. & Hull, R.B. (2005) ‘Motivations and behaviors of new forest owners in Virginia’, Forest Science 51(2), pp. 142–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehne, G., Bjornlund, H. & Cheers, B. (2008) ‘Identifying common traits among Australian irrigators using cluster analysis’, Water Science and Technology 58(3), pp. 587–95. doi:10.2166/wst.2008.681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankester, A. (2012) ‘Self-perceived roles in life and achieving sustainability on family farms in North-eastern Australia’, Australian Geographer 43(3), pp. 233–51. doi:10.1080/00049182.2012.706202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeffer, R. & Ernst, S. (2007) ‘Amenity migration in the U.S. Sierra Nevada’, Geographical Review 97(1), pp. 67–88. doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2007.tb00280.x
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, F. (2013) ‘Farmer-driven innovation in New South Wales, Australia’, Australian Geographer 44(1), pp. 81–95. doi:10.1080/00049182.2013.765349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendham, E., Curtis, A. & Millar, J. (2012) ‘The natural resource management implications of rural property turnover’, Ecology and Society 17(4). doi:10.5751/ES-05071-170405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. (1997) ‘Migration, sources of income, and community change in the nonmetropolitan Northwest’, Professional Geographer 49(4), pp. 418–30. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunkoo, R. & Gursoy, D. (2012) ‘Residents’ support for tourism: an identity perspective’, Annals of Tourism Research 39(1), pp. 243–68. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2011.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pannell, D.J., Marshall, G.R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., Vanclay, F. & Wilkinson, R. (2006) ‘Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(11), pp. 1407–24. doi:10.1071/EA05037
   Google Scholar
• Petrzelka, P., Krannich, R.S. & Brehm, J.M. (2006) ‘Identification with resource-based occupations and desire for tourism: are the two necessarily inconsistent?’, Society & Natural Resources 19(8), pp. 693–707. doi:10.1080/08941920600801108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primdahl, J. & Kristensen, L.S. (2011) ‘The farmer as a landscape manager: management roles and change patterns in a Danish region’, Danish Journal of Geography 111(2), pp. 107–16. doi:10.1080/00167223.2011.10669527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Race, D., Curtis, A. & Sample, R. (2012) ‘Restoring the bush on private land: perspectives of landholders in Victoria’, Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 19(4), pp. 227–40. doi:10.1080/14486563.2012.719347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorice, M.G., Kreuter, U.P., Wilcox, B.P. & Fox, III W.E. (2012) ‘Classifying land-ownership motivations in central, Texas, USA: a first step in understanding drivers of large-scale land cover change’, Journal of Arid Environments 80, pp. 56–64. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stets, J.E. (2006) ‘Identity theory’, in Burke, P.J. (ed.) Contemporary social pshychological theories, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 88–110.
   Google Scholar
• Stets, J.E. & Burke, P.J. (2000) ‘Identity theory and social identity theory’, Social Psychology Quarterly 63(3), pp. 224–37. doi:10.2307/2695870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. & Serpe, R.T. (1982) ‘Commitment, identity salience and role behavior’, in Ickes, W. & Knowles, E. (eds) Personality, roles and social behavior, Springer, New York, pp. 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. & Enticott, G. (2011) ‘The role and functioning of cultural scripts in farming and agriculture’, Sociologia Ruralis 51(3), pp. 256–71. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00537.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F., Howden, P., Mesiti, L. & Glyde, S. (2006) ‘The social and intellectual construction of farming styles: testing Dutch ideas in Australian agriculture’, Sociologia Ruralis 46(1), pp. 61–82. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00404.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F., Silvasti, T. & Howden, P. (2007) ‘Styles, parables and scripts: diversity and conformity in Australian and Finnish agriculture’, Rural Society 17(1), pp. 3–18. doi:10.5172/rsj.351.17.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Weller, S., Smith, E.F. & Pritchard, B. (2013) ‘Family or enterprise? What shapes the business structures of Australian farming?’, Australian Geographer 44(2), pp. 129–42. doi:10.1080/00049182.2013.789592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G.A. (2008) ‘From “weak” to “strong” multifunctionality: conceptualising farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways’, Journal of Rural Studies 24(3), pp. 367–83. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, L. & Belsky, J.M. (2007) ‘Private property rights and community goods: negotiating landowner cooperation amid changing ownership on the rocky mountain front’, Society & Natural Resources 20(8), pp. 689–703. doi:10.1080/08941920701216586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar