What is the Meaning of ‘Social Mix’? Shifting perspectives in planning and implementing public housing estate redevelopment

REFERENCES

• ABS. 2014. 2011 Census QuickStats: Carlton, viewed 13/05/2014. http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/206041117?opendocument&navpos=220.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, C., R. Powell, R. Casey, and S. Coward. 2007. “‘Ordinary, the same as Anywhere Else’: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity in ‘Marginal’ Middle Class Neighbourhoods.” Sociology 41 (2): 239–258. doi: 10.1177/0038038507074971
   Google Scholar
• Arthurson, K. 2002. “Creating Inclusive Community through Balancing Social Mix: A Critical Relationship or Tenuous Link?” Urban Policy and Research 20 (3): 245–261. doi: 10.1080/0811114022000005898
   Google Scholar
• Arthurson, K. 2010a. “Questioning the Rhetoric of Social Mix as a Tool for Planning Social Inclusion.” Urban Policy and Research 28 (2): 225–231. doi: 10.1080/08111141003693117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthurson, K. 2010b. “Operationalising Social Mix: Spatial Scale, Lifestyle and Stigma as Mediating Points in Resident Interaction.” Urban Policy and Research 28 (1): 49–63. doi: 10.1080/08111140903552696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthurson, K. 2012a. Social Mix and the City: Challenging the Mixed Communities Consensus in Housing and Urban Planning Policies. Collingwood, VIC: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Arthurson, K. 2012b. “Social Mix, Reputation and Stigma: Exploring Residents Experiences of Neighbourhood Effects.” In Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives, edited by M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, C. Simpson, and D. MacLennan, 101–119. London, Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arthurson, K. 2013a. “Neighbourhood Effects and Social Cohesion: Exploring the Evidence in Australian Urban Renewal Policies.” In Neighbourhood Effects or Neighbourhood Based Problems? A Policy Context, edited by M. van Ham, 251–268. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arthurson, K. 2013b. “Mixed Tenure Communities and the Effects on Neighbourhood Reputation and Stigma: Residents’ Experiences from Within.” Cities 35: 432–438. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• August, M. 2014. “Negotiating Social Mix in Toronto's First Public Housing Redevelopment: Power, Space and Social Control in Don Mount Court.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (4): 1160–1180. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacque, M.-H., Y. Fijalkow, L. Launay, and S. Vermeersch. 2011. “Social Mix Policies in Paris: Discourses, Policies and Social Effects.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (2): 256–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCW (Carlton Community Website). 2014. “Eco-Carlton.” Viewed on 17/07/2014 at http://carlton.vic.au/eco-carlton.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., and M. Joseph. 2010. “Building "Community" in Mixed-Income Developments: Assumptions, Approaches, and Early Experiences.” Urban Affairs Review 45 (3): 299–335. doi: 10.1177/1078087409341544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citta Property Group. 2014. Viva Carlton. Viewed on 13/5/14 at http://www.citta.com.au/pages/projects/viva_carlton.php.
   Google Scholar
• CRA (Carlton Residents Association). 2014. Sell-off of Public Lands on the Public Housing Carlton Estates. Viewed on 11/7/2014 at http://publichousingwatch.com/index.php/issues/83-inside-look-at-the-carlton-development.
   Google Scholar
• Curley, A. M. 2009. “Draining or Gaining? The Social Networks of Public Housing Movers in Boston.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 26 (2–3): 227–247. doi: 10.1177/0265407509106716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darcy, M. 2010. “De-concentration of Disadvantaged and Mixed Income Housing: A Critical Discourse Approach.” Housing, Theory and Society 27 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1080/14036090902767516
   Google Scholar
• DHS (Department of Human Services). 2009. Carlton Housing Redevelopment—Report No 1 Baseline Survey. Melbourne: Victorian Government.
   Google Scholar
• DHS (Department of Human Services). 2011. Carlton Housing Redevelopment Newsletter. Melbourne: Victorian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Doney, R. H., P. M. McGuirk, and K. J. Mee. 2013. “Social Mix and the Problematisation of Social Housing.” Australian Geographer 44 (4): 401–418. doi: 10.1080/00049182.2013.852500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. 2007. “Neighbourhood Social Mix as a Goal of Housing Policy: A Theoretical Analysis.” European Journal of Housing Policy 7 (1): 19–43. doi: 10.1080/14616710601132526
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, B., and I. Cole. 2001. “Social Balance and Mixed Neighbourhoods in Britain Since 1979: A Review of Discourse and Practice in Social Housing.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19 (1): 103–121. doi: 10.1068/d39j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, E. M. 2010. “The Structuring of Urban Life in a Mixed-Income Housing “Community”.” City & Community 9 (1): 109–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2009.01305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G. 2010. “Draining Ties: Tie Quality versus Content in Low-income Women's Social Networks when Displaced by Redevelopment.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 27 (4): 573–588. doi: 10.1177/0265407510363430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, L. 2008. “Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance?” Urban Studies 45 (12): 2449–2470. doi: 10.1177/0042098008097099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, L., T. Butler, and G. Bridge. 2011. “Introduction: Gentrification, Social Mix/ing and Mixed Communities.” In Mixed Communities: Gentrification by Stealth?, edited by G. Bridge, T. Butler, and L. Lees, 1–14. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lelevrier, C. 2013. “Social Mix Neighbourhood Policies and Social Interaction: The Experience of Newcomers in Three New Renewal Developments in France.” Cities 35: 409–416. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I., K. Arthurson, and A. Ziersch. 2014. “Social Mix and the Role of Design: Competing Interests in the Carlton Public Housing Estate Redevelopment, Melbourne.” Cities 40: 23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2014.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley, D., and C. Dobson. 2008. “Are there Limits to Gentrification? The Contexts of Impeded Gentrification in VANCOUVER.” Urban Studies 45 (12): 2471–2498. doi: 10.1177/0042098008097103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, R., and C. Fuller. 2009. “Mixed Communities: A New Approach to Spatially Concentrated Poverty in England.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 (4): 1014–1028. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00904.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, G., and C. Johnstone. 2012. “Stretching Urban Renaissance: Privatizing Space, Civilizing Place, Summoning ‘Community'.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36 (1): 1–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01067.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Media Release DHS. 2012. Carlton Housing Redevelopment. http://www.dhs.vic.gov.au/about-the-department/plans,-programs-and-projects/projects-and-initiatives/housing-and-accommodation/carlton-housing-redevelopment.
   Google Scholar
• Patulny, R. V., and A. Morris. 2012. “Questioning the Need for Social Mix: The Implications of Friendship Diversity amongst Australian Social Housing Tenants.” Urban Studies 49 (15): 3365–3384. doi: 10.1177/0042098012442414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., and L. Spencer. 1999. “Chapter 9: Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research.” In Analysing Quantitative Data, edited by A. Bryman and R. G. Burgess, 173–194. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., A. Germain, M. H. Bacque, G. Bridge, Y. Fijalkow, and T. Staler. 2013. “‘Social Mix’ and Neighbourhood Revitalization in a Transatlantic Perspective: Comparing Local Policy Discourses and Expectations in Paris (France), Bristol (UK) and Montréal (Canada).” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (2): 430–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, R., A. Murie, and A. Tice. 2006. More than Tenure Mix: Developer and Purchaser Attitudes to New Housing Estates. York: Chartered Institute of Housing/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, K., K. J. Mee, and P. M. McGuirk. 2004. “Questioning the Rhetoric of Social Mix: Courteous Community or Hidden Hostility?” Australian Geographical Studies 42 (2): 234–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8470.2004.00275.x
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. 2011. “Beware the Trojan Horse: Social Mix Constructions in Melbourne.” In Mixed Communities: Gentrification by Stealth?, edited by G. Bridge, T. Butler, and L. Lees, 133–148. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tach, L. M. 2009. “More than Bricks and Mortar: Neighborhood Frames, Social Processes, and the Mixed-Income Redevelopment of a Public Housing Project.” City & Community 8 (3): 269–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2009.01289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziersch, A., and K. Arthurson. 2007. “Social Capital and Housing Tenure in an Adelaide Neighbourhood.” Urban Policy and Research 25 (4): 409–431. doi: 10.1080/08111140701665831
   Google Scholar