Active versus passive: evaluating the effectiveness of inoculation techniques in relation to misinformation about climate change

References

• Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(27), 12107–14. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003187107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, A., Coups, E. J., & Aron, E. N. (2013). Statistics for psychology (6th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, S., Poepsel, M., & Willis, E. (2010). Media literacy and news credibility: Does knowledge of media ownership increase skepticism in news consumers? The Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2(1), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R., & Jeffries, C. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Climate Change, 2(8), 600. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., & Rains, S. A. (2010). A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs, 77(3), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751003758193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist, M., Nilsson, A., & Schultz, P. W. (2019). Experiencing a severe weather event increases concern about climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(220), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethlehem, J. (2010). Selection bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review, 78(2), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, J. T., Brulle, R. J., & Huxster, J. K. (2017). The great divide: Understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014. Climatic Change, 141(4), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1908-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2012). The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218410
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2021). Threat and/in inoculation theory. International Journal of Communication, 15(2021), 13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J. A., & Pfau, M. (2005). Inoculation theory of resistance to influence at maturity: Recent progress in theory development and application and suggestions for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 29(1), 97–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2005.11679045
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Ellerton, P., & Kinkead, D. (2018). Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors. Environmental Research Letters, 13(2), 24018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa49f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Manalo, E. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS One, 12(5), e0175799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs, P., & Skuce, A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8(2), 024024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., Carlton, J. S., Lewandowsky, S., Skuce, A. G., Green, S. A., Nuccitelli, D., Jacobs, P., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., & Rice, K. (2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 048002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diethelm, P., & McKee, M. (2009). Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond? European Journal of Public Health, 19(1), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckn139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011). Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Climate Change, 1(9), 462. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsasser, S. W., & Dunlap, R. E. (2013). Leading voices in the denier choir: Conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. The American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 754–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B., Pfau, M., & Parker, K. A. (2009). The attitude base as a moderator of the effectiveness of inoculation strategy. Communication Monographs, 76(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802682471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802055576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. (2007). Culture and identity‐protective cognition: Explaining the white‐male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(3), 465–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Ecker, U. K. H., Albarracín, D., Amazeen, M. A., Kendeou, P., Lombardi, D., Newman, E. J., Pennycook, G., Porter, E., Rand, D. G., Rapp, D. N., Reifler, J., Roozenbeek, J., Schmid, P., Seifert, C. M., Sinatra, G. M., Swire-Thompson, B., van der Linden, S., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2020). The debunking handbook 2020. https://sks.to/db2020.10.17910/b7.1182
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Oberauer, K., Brophy, S., Lloyd, E. A., & Marriott, M. (2015). Recurrent fury: Conspiratorial discourse in the blogosphere triggered by research on the role of conspiracist ideation in climate denial (Vol. 3) [rejection of science; conspiracist discourse; climate denial; Internet blogs]. https://jspp.psychopen.eu/article/view/443
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Motivated rejection of science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416654436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, V. (2018a). Cyclones are slowing down but increasing in destructive power. The Courier-Mail. https://www.cairnspost.com.au/news/queensland/cyclones-are-slowing-down-but-increasing-in-destructive-power/news-story/d70983ef55d6ca552ab57eb072044c7f
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, V. (2018b). Queensland weather: Tourism ‘unfavourable’ due to extreme weather. The Courier Mail. https://www.news.com.au/national/queensland/queensland-weather-tourism-unfavourable-due-to-extreme-weather/news-story/0f469941adf080c275fc9a1058ec5b64
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Xiao, C. (2013). Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change, 119(2), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0704-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. (1961b). Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(2), 326. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 192–229). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60052-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2019). The complex relation between receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit and political ideology. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(10), 1440–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219830415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgis, D., & McGuire, W. J. (1961). The generality of immunity to persuasion produced by pre-exposure to weakened counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 475–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, K. A., Ivanov, B., & Compton, J. (2012). Inoculation’s efficacy with young adults’ risky behaviors: Can inoculation confer cross-protection over related but untreated issues? Health Communication, 27(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.575541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, K. A., Rains, S. A., & Ivanov, B. (2016). Examining the “blanket of protection” conferred by inoculation: The effects of inoculation messages on the cross-protection of related attitudes. Communication Monographs, 83(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1030681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1865–1880. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polage, D. C. (2012). Making up history: False memories of fake news stories. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v8i2.456
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Government. (2019). Cyclone and storm surge. https://www.getready.qld.gov.au/understand-your-risk/types-natural-disasters/cyclone-and-storm-surge
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. W., & Thistlethwaite, D. L. (1969). An analysis of active and passive defenses in inducing resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11(4), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2018). The fake news game: Actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation. Journal of Risk Research, 22(5), 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1443491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019). Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017). Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges, 1(2), 1600008. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duyn, E., & Collier, J. (2019). Priming and fake news: The effects of elite discourse on evaluations of news media. Mass Communication and Society, 22(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1511807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar