The roles of stimulus and response set size in the identification and categorisation of unidimensional stimuli

References

• Ashby, F. G., Boynton, G., and Lee, W. W., 1994. Categonzation response time with multidimensional stimuli, Perception and Psychophysics 55 (1994), pp. 11–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, F. G., and Maddox, W. T., 1994. A response time theory of separability and integrality in speeded classification, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 38 (1994), pp. 423–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, C. R., Bower, G. H., and Crothers, D. J., 1965. An introduction to mathematical learning theory. New York: Wiley; 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe-Center, J. G., Rogers, M. S., and O'Connell, D. N., 1955. Transmission of information about sucrose and saline solutions through the sense of taste, Journal of Psychology 39 (1955), pp. 157–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, J. E., and Durlach, N. I., 1973. Intensity perception: IV. Resolution in roving-level discrimination, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 53 (1973), pp. 1270–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braida, L. D., and Durlach, N. I., 1972. Intensity perception: II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51 (1972), pp. 483–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braida, L. D., Lim, J. S., Berliner, J. E., Durlach, N. I., Rabinovwitz, W. M., and Purks, S. R., 1984. Intensity perception: XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76 (1984), pp. 722–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlach, N. I., and Braida, L. D., 1969. Intensity perception: I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 46 (1969), pp. 372–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, P. M., and Craig, J. C., 1992. Response competition: A major source of interference in a tactile identification task, Perception and Psychophysics 51 (1992), pp. 199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, W. R., 1953. An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness, Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (1953), pp. 373–380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gravetter, F., and Lockhead, G. R., 1973. Criterial range as a frame of reference for stimulus judgment, Psychological Review 80 (1973), pp. 203–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hake, H. W., and Garner, W. R., 1951. The effect of presenting various numbers of discrete steps on scale reading accuracy, Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (1951), pp. 358–366.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karpiuk, P., Lacouture, Y., and Marley, A. A.J., 1997. "A limited capacity, wave equality, random walk model of absolute identification". In: Marley, A. A.J., ed. Choice, decision and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1997. pp. 279–299.
   Google Scholar
• Lacouture, Y., 1995. Expanding MEL response box to accommodate up to 16 external buttons, Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 27 (1995), pp. 506–511.
   Google Scholar
• Lacouture, Y., 1997. Bow, range, and sequential effects in absolute identification: A response-time analysis, Psychological Research 60 (1997), pp. 121–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacouture, Y., and Marley, A. A.J., 1991. A connectionist model of choice and reaction time in absolute identification, Connection Science 3 (1991), pp. 401–433.
   Google Scholar
• Lacouture, Y., and Marley, A. A.J., 1995. A mapping model of the bow effect in absolute identification, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 39 (1995), pp. 383–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockhead, G. R., 1984. "Sequential predictors of choice in psychophysical tasks". In: Komblum, S., and Requin, J., eds. Preparatory states and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D., 1994. Thurstone and sensory scaling: Then and now, Psychological Review 101 (1994), pp. 271–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D., Nosofsky, R. M., Green, D. M., and Smith, A. F., 1982. The bow and sequential effects in absolute identification, Perception and Psychophysics 32 (1982), pp. 397–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marley, A. A.J., and Cook, V. T., 1984. A fixed rehearsal capacity interpretation of limits on absolute identification performance, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 37 (1984), pp. 136–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marley, A. A.J., and Cook, V. T., 1986. A limited capacity rehearsal model for psychological judgments applied to magnitude estimation, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 37 (1986), pp. 136–151.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review 63 (1956), pp. 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, S., 1989. A limited-capacity response process in absolute identification, Perception and Psychophysics. 46 (1989), pp. 167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, S., and Ward, L. M., 1995. Pure feedback effects in absolute identification, Perception and Psychophysics 57 (1995), pp. 1065–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., 1983. Information integration and the identification of stimulus noise and criterial noise in absolute judgment, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9 (1983), pp. 299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., 1986. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 (1986), pp. 39–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., 1997. "An exemplar-based random-walk model of speeded categorization and absolute judgment". In: Marley, A. A.J., ed. Choice, decision and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1997. pp. 347–365.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, I., 1952. The information of elementary auditory displays, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24 (1952), pp. 745–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., 1988. Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 20 (1) (1988), pp. 206–217.
   Google Scholar
• Shank, D. R., and Gluck, M. A., 1994. Tests of an adaptive network model for the identification and categorization of continuous-dimension stimuli, Connection Science 6 (1994), pp. 59–89.
   Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. H., and Nosofsky, R. M., 1994. Seven plus or minus two: A commentary on capacity limitations, Psychological Review 101 (1994), pp. 357–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teghtsoonian, R., 1971. On the exponents in Stevens' law and the constant in Ekman's law, Psychological Review 86 (1971), pp. 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L., 1927. A law of comparative judgment, Psychological Review 34 (1927), pp. 273–286.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, L. M., and Lockhead, G. R., 1970. Sequential effects and memory in category judgments, Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1970), pp. 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, L. M., and Lockhead, G. R., 1971. Response system processes in absolute judgment, Perception and Psychophysics 9 (1971), pp. 73–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, D. L., Green, D. M., and Luce, R. D., 1977. Effects of practice and distribution of auditory signals on absolute identification, Perception and Psychophysics 22 (1977), pp. 223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar