The dimensionality of ratings of performance appraisal systems

References

• Ashkanasay, N. M., 1994. Automatic categorisation and causal attribution: The effect of gender bias in supervisor responses to subordinate performance, Australian Journal of Psychology 46 (1994), pp. 177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashkanasay, N. M., and Gallois, C., 1994. Leader attributions and evaluation: Effect of locus of control, supervisory control, and task control, Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59 (1994), pp. 27–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, C. G., and Murphy, K. R., 1985. Toward narrowing the research-practice gap in performance appraisal, Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (1985), pp. 335–345.
   Google Scholar
• Bannister, B. D., and Balkin, D. B., 1990. Performance evaluation and compensation feedback messages: An integrated model, Journal Of Occupational Psychology 63 (1990), pp. 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, M., 1992. Future directions in remuneration management, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 30 (1992), pp. 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Bernadin, H. J., and Beatty, R. W., 1984. Performance appraisal: Assessing human behaviour at work. Boston: Kent; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bretz, R D., Milkovich, G. T., and Read, W., 1992. The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications, Journal of Management 18 (1992), pp. 321–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, R. J., Weitzel, W., and Weir, T., 1978. Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews: Replication and extension, Personnel Psychology 31 (1978), pp. 903–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., and Williams, R. E., 1989. Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates, Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (1989), pp. 130–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E., 1982. Quality, productivity and competitive position. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T., and Meglino, B., 1984. A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions, Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance 33 (1984), pp. 360–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dipboye, R. L., and de Pontbriand, R., 1981. Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisal systems, Journal of Applied Psychology 66 (1981), pp. 248–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbins, G. H., Platz, S. J., and Houston, J., 1993. Relationship between trust in appraisal and appraisal effectiveness: A field study, Journal of Business and Psychology 7 (1993), pp. 309–322.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. M., 1981. Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal, Journal of Applied Psychology 66 (1981), pp. 127–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried, Y., Tiegs, R. B., and Bellamy, A. R., 1992. Personal and interpersonal predictors of supervisors' avoidance of evaluating subordinates, Journal of Applied Psychology 77 (1992), pp. 462–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, W. F., and Mossholder, K. W., 1990. Employee reactions to contextual and session components of performance appraisal, Journal Of Applied Psychology 75 (1990), pp. 371–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J., 1986. Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations, Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (1986), pp. 340–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, R. W., and Bedeian, A. G., 1989. Employee performance evaluations: Effects of rake age, rater age, and ratee gender, Journal of Organizational Behavior 10 (1989), pp. 83–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon, S. C., Meyer, D. G., and Taylor, R. R., 1994. Consequences of Gainsharing: A field experiment revisited, Group and Organisation Management 19 (1994), pp. 87–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedge, J. W., and Kavanagh, M. J., 1988. Improving the accuracy of performance evaluation: Comparison of three methods of performance appraisal feedback, Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (1988), pp. 68–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., and McKellin, D. B., 1993. Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use?, Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54 (1993), pp. 321–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., and Taylor, M. S., 1979. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations, Journal of Applied Psychology 64 (1979), pp. 349–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivancevich, J. M., 1982. Subordinates' reaction to performance appraisal interviews: A test of feedback and goal-setting techniques, Journal Of Applied Psychology 47 (1982), pp. 581–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, I., and Purcell, J., 1992. Performance related pay: Objectives and application, Human Resources Management Journal 2 (1992), pp. 16–33.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. J., 1989. An integrated control theory model of work motivation, Academy of Management Review 14 (1989), pp. 150–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, F. J., Barnes, J. L., and Murphy, K. R., 1978. Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation, Journal Of Applied Psychology 65 (1978), pp. 751–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langan-Fox, J., 1993. The incidence of formal system of performance appraisal and tied-to-performance remuneration systems. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Management; 1993, Report prepared for the.
   Google Scholar
• Langan-Fox, J., Bell, R., Morizzi, M., and McDonald, L., 1995. Performance appraisal in action: A case study of an Australian Government business enterprise. 1995, Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P., and Huber, V. L., 1992. Schedules of reinforcement: Lessons from the past and issues for the future, Journal of Organizational Behaviour Management 12 (1992), pp. 125–149.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P., Skarlicki, D., Irvine, D., and Siegel, J., 1993. "The increasing importance of performance appraisal to employee effectiveness in organizational settings in North America". In: Cooper, C. L., and Robertson, I. T., eds. International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1993. pp. 87–133.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, E. E., 1967. The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance, Journal of Applied Psychology 51 (1967), pp. 369–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, M. P., Jung, I., Near, J. P., and Greenberger, D. B., 1991. Predictors and outcomes of reactions to pay-for-performance plans, Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (1991), pp. 508–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milkovich, G. T., and Wigdor, A. K., 1991. Pay for performance: Evaluating performance appraisal and merit pay. Washington, DC: National Academy; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Mount, M. K., 1983. Comparisons of managerial and employee satisfaction with a performance appraisal system, Personnel Psychology 36 (1983), pp. 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., 1991. Criterion issues in performance appraisal research Behavioral accuracy versus classification accuracy, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991), pp. 45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., and Balzer, W. K., 1989. Rater errors and rating accuracy, Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (1989), pp. 619–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., and Cleveland, J. N., Improving performance appraisal: Designing, implementing and evaluating goal-oriented performance appraisal systems. Presented at Workshop presented at the Inaugural Australian Industrial and Organisational Psychology Conference. Sydney, July, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., and Reynolds, D. H., 1988. Does true halo affect Observed halo?, Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (1988), pp. 235–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nankervis, A. R., and Penrose, J., 1990. Performance appraisal: Where are we now?, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resource Management (1990), pp. 74–81.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, B. R., Mohrman, A. M., and Milliman, J. F., 1991. Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: A longitudinal study, Academy of Management Journal 34 (1991), pp. 352–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeroff, W. F., and Wexley, K. N., 1979. An exploration of the relationships between performance feedback interview characteristics and interview outcomes as perceived by managers and subordinates, Journal of Occupational Psychology 52 (1979), pp. 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. L., and Porter, L. W., 1986. Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback, Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (1986), pp. 211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberson, L., Torkel, S., Korsgaard, A., Klein, A., Diddams, M., and Cayer, M., 1993. Self-appraisal and perceptions of the appraisal discussion, Journal of Organizational Behavior 14 (1993), pp. 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. S., and Goode, D. L., 1988. An analysis of managers' reactions to their own performance appraisal feedback, Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (1988), pp. 63–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, R. C., 1988. Mood, categorisation breadth and performance appraisal: The effects of order of information acquisition and affective state on halo. accuracy. information retrieval and evaluations, Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 42 (1988), pp. 22–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. S., Fisher, C. D., and Ilgen, D. R., 1990. "Individuals' reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective". In: Ferris, G. R., and Rowland, K. M., eds. Performance evaluation, goal setting and feedback. Greenwich Jai; 1990. pp. 217–260.
   Google Scholar
• Tharenou, P., 1992. Performance review: Dilemmas and contradictions, The Bulletin of the Australian Psychological Society (1992), pp. 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh Bastos, M., and Fletcher, C., 1995. Exploring the individual's perception of sources of credibility of feedback in the work environment, International Journal of Selection and Assessment 3 (1) (1995), pp. 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. J., Cafferty, T. P., and DeNisi, A. S., 1990. The effect of performance appraisal salience on recall and ratings, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 46 (1990), pp. 217–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar