Habitat variables affecting nest predation rates at small ponds: a case study of the Little Crake Porzana parva and Water Rail Rallus aquaticus

REFERENCES

• Albrecht, T., Horák, D., Kreisinger, J., Weidinger, K., Klvana, P. & Michot, T.C. 2006. Factors determining Pochard nest predation along a wetland gradient. J. Wildlife Manage. 70: 784–791. doi: 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[784:FDPNPA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, T. 2010. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike's information criterion. J. Wildlife Manage. 74: 1175–1178. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01236.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J.E. & Buhl, D.A. 2011. Nest survival of American Coots relative to grazing, burning, and water depths. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 6: 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Báldi, A. & Batáry, P. 2005. Nest predation in European reedbeds: different losses in edges but similar losses in interiors. Folia Zool. 54: 285–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batáry, P. & Báldi, A. 2005. Factors affecting the survival of real and artificial great reed warbler's nests. Biologia 60: 215–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batáry, P., Winkler, H. & Baldi, A. 2004. Experiments with artificial nests on predation in reed habitats. J. Ornithol. 145: 59–63. doi: 10.1007/s10336-003-0010-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, Å., Nilsson, S.G. & Boström, U. 1992. Predation on artificial wader nests on large and small bogs along a south-north gradient. Ornis Scand. 23: 13–16. doi: 10.2307/3676421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonesi, L. & Palazon, S. 2007. The American mink in Europe: Status, impacts, and control. Biol. Conserv. 134: 470–483. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. 2002. Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Céréghino, R., Biggs, J., Oertli, B. & Declerck, S. 2008. The ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of a neglected freshwater habitat. Hydrobiologia 597: 1–6. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-9225-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choiński, A. 1991. Katalog jezior Polski. Cz. II. Pojezierze Mazurskie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, C.J. & Eddleman, W.R. 1994. Virginia rail. In Tacha, T.C. & Braun, C.E. (eds) Migratory Shore and Upland Game Bird Management in North America, 192–206. International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, C.J., Eddleman, W.R. & Anderson, S.H. 1994. Nesting success and survival of Virginia Rails and Soras. Wilson Bull. 106: 466–473.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, W. 1997. Nest predation: the relative effects of nest characteristics, clutch size and parental behaviour. Anim. Behav. 53: 93–103. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Kroon, G.H.J. 2006. Het broedsucces van de Waterral in Nederland. Limosa 79: 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, S.J. & Dinsmore, J.J. 2007. Modeling avian nest survival in program MARK. Stud. Avian Biol. 34: 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, S.J., White, G.C. & Knopf, F.L. 2002. Advanced techniques for modeling avian nest survival. Ecology 83: 3476–3488. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[3476:ATFMAN]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittberner, H. & Dittberner, W. 1990. Öko-ethologische Beobachtungen am Nest der Kleinralle (Porzana parva). Bonner Zoologische Beiträge 41: 27–58.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R.J. & Koford, R.R. 2004. Consequences of rainfall variation for breeding wetland blackbirds. Can. J. Zool. 82: 1316–1325. doi: 10.1139/z04-107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamrat, R. 2009. Vegetation in small water bodies in the young glacial landscape of West Pomerania. In Łachacz, A. (ed.) Contemporary Problems of Management and Environmental Protection. Vol. 2. Wetlands – their Functions and Protection, 95–105. University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn.
   Google Scholar
• Gjerdrum, C., Elphick, C.S. & Rubega, M. 2005. Nest site selection and nesting success in saltmarsh breeding sparrows: the importance of nest habitat, timing, and study site differences. Condor 107: 849–862. doi: 10.1650/7723.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R.E., Hawell, J. & Johnson, T.H. 1987. Identification of predators of wader eggs from egg remains. Bird Study 34: 87–91. doi: 10.1080/00063658709476940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson, G. & Elmberg, J. 2008. Density-dependent nest predation – an experiment with simulated Mallard nests in contrasting landscapes. Ibis 150: 259–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00772.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyn, K.L. & Clark, R.G. 1997. Cover characteristics and success of natural and artificial duck nests. J. Field Ornithol. 68: 33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honza, M., Øien, I.J., Moksnes, A. & Røskaft, E. 1998. Survival of Reed Warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus clutches in relation to nest position. Bird Study 45: 104–108. doi: 10.1080/00063659809461083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, J.P. 2006. Water depth influences nest predation for a wetland-dependent bird in fragmented bottomland forests. Biol. Conserv. 127: 37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedlikowski, J., Brambilla, M. & Suska-Malawska, M. 2014. Fine-scale selection of nesting habitat in Little Crake Porzana parva and Water Rail Rallus aquaticus in small ponds. Bird Study 61: 171–181. doi: 10.1080/00063657.2014.904271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R.K.B. 1999. The breeding biology of the Water Rail Rallus aquaticus in Britain and Ireland. Bird Study 46: 305–308. doi: 10.1080/00063659909461143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koons, D.N. & Rotella, J.J. 2003. Comparative nesting success of sympatric Lesser Scaup and Ring-necked Ducks. J. Field Ornithol. 74: 222–229. doi: 10.1648/0273-8570-74.3.222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansenl, J.N. 1998. Egg predation in reedbed nesting Greylag Geese Anser anser in Vejlerne, Denmark. Ardea 86: 137–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lariviere, S. 1999. Reasons why predators cannot be inferred from nest remains. Condor 101: 718–721. doi: 10.2307/1370209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Iborra, G.M., Pinheiro, R.T., Sancho, C. & Martínez, A. 2004. Nest size influences nest predation risk in two coexisting Acrocephalus warblers. Ardea 92: 85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T.E., Scott, J. & Menge, C. 2000. Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 2287–2293. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musilová, Z., Musil, P., Zouhar, J. & Poláková, S. 2014. Nest survival in the Reed Bunting Emberiza schoeniclus in fragmented wetland habitats: the effect of nest-site selection. Ornis Fenn. 91: 138–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, S.G. 1984. The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: the importance of nest predation and competition. Ornis Scand. 15: 167–175. doi: 10.2307/3675958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opermanis, O. 2004. Appearance and vulnerability of artificial duck nests to avian predator. J. Avian Biol. 35: 410–415. doi: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03243.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opermanis, O., Mednis, A. & Bauga, I. 2001. Duck nests and predators: interaction, specialisation and possible management. Wildlife Biol. 7: 87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasinelli, G. & Schiegg, K. 2006. Fragmentation within and between wetland reserves: the importance of spatial scales for nest predation in reed buntings. Ecography 29: 721–732. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04728.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picman, J. 1988. Experimental study of predation on eggs of ground-nesting birds: effects of habitat and nest distribution. Condor 90: 124–131. doi: 10.2307/1368441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picman, J., Milks, M.L. & Leptich, M. 1993. Patterns of predation on passerine nests in marshes: effects of water depth and distance from edge. Auk 110: 89–94. doi: 10.2307/4088408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak, M. 2007. Nest-site selection and nest predation in the Great Bittern Botaurus stellaris population in eastern Poland. Ardea 95: 31–38. doi: 10.5253/078.095.0104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, L.A. 2007. Approximating variance of demographic parameters using the delta method: a reference for avian biologists. Condor 109: 949–954. doi: 10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[949:AVODPU]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricklefs, R.E. 1969. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithson Contrib. Zool. 9: 1–48. doi: 10.5479/si.00810282.9
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, R.J. 1972. Optimal niche space of the redwinged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). I. Nesting success in marsh and upland habitat. Can. J. Zool. 50: 247–263. doi: 10.1139/z72-036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush, S.A., Cooper, R.J. & Woodrey, M.S. 2007. A nondestructive method for estimating the age of Clapper Rail eggs. J. Field Ornithol. 78: 407–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2007.00131.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush, S.A., Woodrey, M.S. & Cooper, R.J. 2010. Variation in the nesting habits of Clapper Rails in tidal marshes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Condor 112: 356–362. doi: 10.1525/cond.2010.090078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salonen, V. & Penttinen, A. 1988. Factors affecting nest predation in the Great Crested Grebe: field observations, experiments and their statistical analysis. Ornis Fenn. 65: 13–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A.B. & Raveling, D.G. 1992. Mortality during the breeding season. In Batt, B.D.J., Afton, A.D., Anderson, M.G., Ankney, C.D., Johnson, D.H., Kadlec, J.A. & Krapu, G.L. (eds) The Ecology and Management of Breeding Waterfowl, 396–422. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffer, M., Van Geest, G.J., Zimmer, K., Jeppesen, E., Søndergaard, M., Butler, M.G., Hanson, M.A., Declerck, S. & De Meester, L. 2006. Small habitat size and isolation can promote species richness: second-order effects on biodiversity in shallow lakes and ponds. Oikos 112: 227–231. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14145.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiegg, K., Eger, M. & Pasinelli, G. 2007. Nest predation in Reed Buntings Emberiza schoeniclus: an experimental study. Ibis 149: 365–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00654.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K.A. & Whelan, C.J. 2005. Quantifying male Wood Thrush nest-attendance and its relationship to nest success. Condor 107: 138–144. doi: 10.1650/7582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sládeček, M., Kubelka, V., Mlíkovský, J. & Šálek, M. 2014. Coping with nest predation risk in a species-rich bird community inhabiting a Siberian wetland. Folia Zool. 63: 256–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solarski, H. & Nowicki, Z. 1993. Hydrologiczne i ekologiczne znaczenie oczek wodnych i mokradeł na Pojezierzu Mazurskim. Zeszyty Naukowe Komitetu “Człowiek i Środowisko” 6: 175–180.
   Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, M., Jeppesen, E. & Jensen, J.P. 2005. Pond or lake: does it make any difference? Archiv Für Hydrobiologie 162: 143–165. doi: 10.1127/0003-9136/2005/0162-0143
   Google Scholar
• Stauffer, G.E., Diefenbach, D.R., Marshall, M.R. & Brauning, D.W. 2011. Nest success of grassland sparrows on reclaimed surface mines. J. Wildlife Manage. 75: 548–557. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surmacki, A. 1998. Breeding avifauna of small mid-field ponds in north-western Poland. Acta Ornithol. 33: 149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó, L.V. 1969/70. Vergleichende Untersuchungen der Brutverhaltnisse der drei Porzana-Arten in Ungarn. Aquila 76–77: 73–115.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P.B. & van Perlo, B. 1998. Rails: A Guide to the Rails, Crakes, Gallinules and Coots of the World. Pica Press, Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. 1937. Incubation period of Water Rail. Br. Birds 31: 62.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, M.W. 1999. Wetland Birds. Habitat Resources and Conservation Implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• White, G.C. & Burnham, K.P. 1999. Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46: 120–138. doi: 10.1080/00063659909477239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zduniak, P. 2006. The prey of hooded crow (Corvus cornix L.) in wetland: study of damaged egg shells of birds. Pol. J. Ecol. 54: 491–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar