Flash in the pan: how grassland renewal affects reproduction of Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus

References

• Aebisher, N.J. 1999. Multi-way comparisons and generalized linear models of nest success: extensions of the Mayfield method. Bird Study 46: S22–S31. doi: 10.1080/00063659909477228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausden, M., Rowlands, A., Sutherland, W.J. & James, R. 2003. Diet of breeding Lapwing Vanellus vanellus and Redshank Tringa totanus on coastal grazing marsh and implications for habitat management. Bird Study 50: 285–293. doi: 10.1080/00063650309461321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, D. 1988. The effects of improvement of upland, marginal grasslands on the distribution and density of breeding wading birds (Charadriiformes) in northern England. Biol. Conserv. 45: 221–236. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(88)90141-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, D. 1989. The effects of improvement of upland, marginal grasslands on the breeding success of Lapwings Vanellus vanellus and other waders. Ibis 131: 497–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1989.tb04786.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, D. 1990. The role of predation, food and agricultural practice in determining the breeding success of the Lapwing Vanellus vanellus on upland grasslands. J. Anim. Ecol. 59: 915–929. doi: 10.2307/5022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, J.P. 1989. Nature Management by Grazing and Cutting. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, J.P. & Berendse, F. 1999. Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Tree 14: 63–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat. Soft. 67: 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beintema, A.J. & Müskens, G.J.D.M. 1987. Nesting success of birds breeding in Dutch agricultural grasslands. J. Appl. Ecol. 24: 743–758. doi: 10.2307/2403978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker, R.W., Düttmann, H., de Vries, Y., Bakker, J.P., Buchwald, R. & Brauckmann, H.-J. 2006. 30 years of hay meadow succession without fertilization: how does it affect soil and avifauna groups? Osnabr. Naturwiss. Mitt. 32: 145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Bellebaum, J. & Boschert, M. 2003. Bestimmung von Prädatoren an Nestern von Wiesenvögeln. Vogelwelt 124: 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, A., Lindberg, T. & Källebrink, K.G. 1992. Hatching success of lapwings on farmland: differences between habitats and colonies of different size. J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 469–476. doi: 10.2307/5337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D. & Hill, D.A. 1992. Methoden der Feldornithologie. Bestandserfassung in der Praxis. Neumann Verlag, Radebeul.
   Google Scholar
• Bio-Consult & regioplan & uvp. 2009. Brutbestandserfassung im EU-Vogelschutzgebiet V66 “Niederungen der Süd-, Mittelradde und der Marka” Unpubl. Report on behalf of Staatliche Vogelschutzwarte im NLWKN, Hannover.
   Google Scholar
• Blüml, V., Belting, H., Diekmann, M. & Zacharias, D. 2012. Erfolgreiche Feuchtgrünlandentwicklung durch Naturschutzmaßnahmen. Inform.d. Naturschutz Niedersachs. 32: 171–235.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, D.E., Fuller, R.J., Bunce, R.G.H., Duckworth, J.C. & Shrubb, M. 2000. Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 771–788. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00548.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conijn, J.G., Velthof, G.L. & Tauber, F. (eds) 2002. Grassland resowing and grass-arable crop rotation. International Workshop on Agricultural and Environmental Issues, Wageningen 18 & 19. April 2002. Plant Research International B.V. Wageningen, Report 47.
   Google Scholar
• Creighton, P., Kennedy, E., Shalloo, E., Boland, T.M. & O’Donovan, M. 2011. A survey analysis of grassland dairy farming in Ireland, investigating grassland management, technology adoption and sward renewal. Grass Forage Sci. 66: 251–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00784.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degen, A. 2017. Gelege- und Kükenschutz im Bereich des Landschaftsschutzgebietes “Mittelradde-Marka-Südradde”. Ergebnisbericht 2017. Unpubl. Report on behalf of Landkreis Emsland, Meppen.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, P.F., Green, R.E. & Heath, M.F. 2001. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 268: 25–29. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Düttmann, H., Tewes, E. & Akkermann, M. 2006. Effekte verschiedener Managementmaßnahmen auf Brutbestände von Wiesenlimikolen – Erste Ergebnisse aus Untersuchungen von Kompensationsflächen in der Wesermarsch (Landkreise Cuxhaven, Wesermarsch). Osnabr. Naturwiss. Mitt. 32: 175–181.
   Google Scholar
• Eglington, S.M., Bolton, M., Smart, M.A., Sutherland, W.J., Watkinson, A.R. & Gill, J.A. 2010. Managing water levels on wet grasslands to improve foraging conditions for breeding northern lapwing Vanellus vanellus. J. Appl. Ecol. 47: 451–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01783.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ens, B.J., Kersten, M., Brenninkmeijer, A. & Hulscher, J.B. 1992. Territory quality, parental effort and reproductive success of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus). J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 709–715. doi: 10.2307/5625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, H. 1988. Effects of agriculture on the breeding ecology of Lapwings Vanellus vanellus. J. Appl. Ecol. 25: 487–503. doi: 10.2307/2403839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedhart, P.W., Teunissen, W.A. & Schekkerman, H. 2010. Effect van nestbezoek en onderzoek op weidevogels. Sovon-onderzoeksrapport 2010/01. Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland, Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad, N.W., Crutzinger, G.W., Gross, K., Haarstad, J., Knops, J.M.H. & Tilman, D. 2009. Plant species loss decreases arthropod diversity and shifts trophic structure. Ecol. Lett. 12: 1029–1039. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01356.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazler, K.R. 2004. Mayfield logistic regression: A practical approach for analysis of nest survial. Auk 121: 707–716 doi: 10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121[0707:MLRAPA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustings, M.F.H., Kwak, R.G.M., Opdam, P.F.M. & Reijnen, M.J.S.M. 1989. Vogelinventarisatie. Achtergronden, richtlijnen en verslaglegging. Pudoc, Wageningen.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, J., Manson, P., Barfknecht, R. & Fredricks, T. 2014. Common vole (Microtus arvalis) ecology and management: implications for risk assessment of plant protection products. Pest Manage. Sci. 70: 869–878. doi: 10.1002/ps.3695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker, S., Düttmann, H. & Ehrnsberger, R. 2006. Schlupferfolg und Kükenmortalität beim Kiebitz (Vanellus vanellus) auf unterschiedlich gemanagten Grünlandflächen in der Stollhammer Wisch (Landkreis Wesermarsch, Niedersachsen). Osnabr. Naturwiss. Mitt. 32: 111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Kapfer, A. 1988. Versuche zur Renaturierung gedüngten Feuchtgrünlandes - Aushagerung und Vegetationsentwicklung. Dissertationes Botanicae 120: 1–153
   Google Scholar
• Kentie, R., Hooijmeijer, J.C.E.W., Trimbos, K.B., Groen & N.M. & Piersma, T. 2013. Intensified agricultural use of grasslands reduces growth and survival of precocial shorebird chicks. J. Appl. Ecol. 50: 243–251. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kentie, R., Both, C., Hooijmeijer, J.C.E.W., Piersma, T. & Nager, R. 2015. Management of modern agricultural landscapes increases nest predation rates in Black-tailed Godwits Limosa limosa. Ibis 157: 614–625. doi: 10.1111/ibi.12273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijn, D., Schekkerman, H., Dimmers, W.J., van Kats, R.J.M., Melman, D. & Teunissen, W.A. 2010. Adverse effects of agricultural intensification and climate change on breeding habitat quality of black-tailed godwits Limosa l. limosa in the Netherlands. Ibis 152: 475–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2010.01025.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klomp, H. 1954. De terreinkeus van de Kievit. Ardea 42: 1–139.
   Google Scholar
• Korner-Nievergelt, F., Roth, T., von Felten, S., Guelat, J., Almasi, B. & Korner-Nievergelt, P. 2015. Bayesian Data Analysis in Ecology using Linear Models with R, BUGS and Stan. Elsevier, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kragten, S., Nagel, J.C. & de Snoo, G.R. 2008. The effectiveness of volunteer nest protection on the nest success of Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus on Dutch arable farms. Ibis 150: 667–673. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00842.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, J.R. 1971. Territory and breeding density in Great Tit, Parus major L. Ecology 52: 2–22. doi: 10.2307/1934734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laidlaw, R.A., Smart, J., Smart, M.A. & Gill, J.A. 2016. Scenarios of habitat management options to reduce predator impacts on nesting waders. J. Appl. Ecol 54: 1219–1229. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrechts, M.W., Caro, S., Charmantier, A., Gross, N., Gross, M.-J., Perret, P., Cartan-Son, M., Dias, P.C., Blondel, J. & Thomas, D.W. 2004. Habitat quality as a predictor of spatial variation in blue tit reproductive performance: a multi-plot analyses in a heterogenous landscape. Oecologia 141: 555–561. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1681-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liker, A. 1992. Breeding biology of Lapwings Vanellus vanellus in Southern Hungary. Wader Study Group Bull. 66: 38.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Donald, M.A. & Bolton, M. 2008a. Predation on wader nests in Europe. Ibis 150: 54–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00869.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Donald, M.A. & Bolton, M. 2008b. Predation of Lapwing Vanellus vanellus nests in England and Wales: effects of nest density, habitat and predator abundance. J. Orn. 149: 555–563. doi: 10.1007/s10336-008-0303-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield, H.F. 1961. Nesting success calculating from exposure. Wilson Bull. 73: 255–261.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, H.M. 2012. Ecology and conservation of breeding Lapwings in upland grassland systems: Effects of agricultural management and soil properties. PhD Thesis, University of Stirling.
   Google Scholar
• McCracken, D.I. & Tallowin, J.R. 2004. Swards and structure: the interactions between farming practices and bird food resources in lowland grasslands. Ibis 146: 108–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milsom, T.P., Hart, J.D., Parkin, W.K. & Peel, S. 2002. Management of coastal grazing marshes for breeding waders: the importance of surface topography and wetness. Biol. Conserv. 103: 199–207. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00122-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, W., Glauser, C., Sattler, T. & Schifferli, L. 2009. Wirkung von Maßnahmen für den Kiebitz Vanellus vanellus in der Schweiz und Empfehlungen für die Artenförderung. Der Ornithologische Beobachter 106: 327–350.
   Google Scholar
• Oertzen, G. & Düttmann, H. 2006. Brutverhalten von Wiesenlimikolen auf unterschiedlich bewirtschafteten Niederungsstandorten in der oberen Mittelradde-Niederung (Landkreise Emsland, Cloppenburg; Niedersachsen). Osnabr. Naturwiss. Mitt. 32: 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Oleszczuk, R., Regina, K., Szajdak, L., Höper, H. & Maryganova, V. 2008. Impacts of agricultural utilization of peat soils on the greenhouse gas balance. In Strack, M. (ed) Peatlands and Climate Change. International Peat Society, 70–97. IPS, Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Pierotti, R. 1982. Habitat selection and its effect on reproductive output in the herring gull in Newfoundland. Ecology 63: 854–868. doi: 10.2307/1936804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Regioplan & uvp. 2016. Gelege- und Kükenschutz für Wiesenvögel an der Mittelradde und Marka (LK Cloppenburg) 2016. Unpubl. Report on behalf of Landkreis Cloppenburg, Cloppenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Roodbergen, M. & Teunissen, W. 2014. Meadow bird conservation in the Netherlands – lessons from the past and future developments. Vogelwelt 135: 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Roodhart, J. 2014: Erfolg im Wiesenvogelschutz nach zehnjähriger Schutzgebietsbetreuung im Eemland Polder, Niederlande. Vogelwelt 135: 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Salek, M. & Smilauer, P. 2002. Predation on Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus nests: the effect of population density and spatial distribution of nests. Ardea 90: 51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schekkerman, H. & Beintema, A.J. 2007. Abundance of invertebrates and foraging success of black-tailed godwit Limosa limosa chicks in relation to agricultural grassland management. Ardea 95: 39–54. doi: 10.5253/078.095.0105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schekkerman, H., Teunissen, W.A. & Oosterveld, E.B. 2009. Mortality of black-tailed godwit Limosa limosa and northern lapwing Vanellus vanellus chicks in wet grasslands: influence of predation and agriculture. J. Orn. 150: 133–145. doi: 10.1007/s10336-008-0328-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schifferli, L., Spaar, R. & Koller, A. 2006. Fence and plough for Lapwings: nest protection to improve nest and chick survival in Swiss Farmland. Osnabr. Naturwiss. Mitt. 32: 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, K., Kayser, M., Müller, J. & Isselstein, J. 2009. The effect of grassland renovation on soil mineral nitrogen and on nitrate leaching during winter. J. Plant. Nutr. Soil. Sci. 172: 512–519. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200800217
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, A.S., Harris, S., Ralston, C. & White, P.C.L. 2003. Factors influencing the nesting success of lapwing Vanellus vanellus and behaviour of red fox Vulpes vulpes in lapwing nesting sites. Bird Study 50: 39–46. doi: 10.1080/00063650309461288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, R.D., Chaney, K. & Tyler, G.A. 2007. Factors affecting nest survival of Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus in arable farmland: an agri-environment scheme prescription can enhance nest survival. Bird Study 54: 168–175. doi: 10.1080/00063650709461472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrubb, M. 1990. Effects of agricultural change on nesting Lapwings in England and Wales. Bird Study 37: 115–127. doi: 10.1080/00063659009477047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrubb, M. 2007. The Lapwing. T. & A.D. Poyser, London.
   Google Scholar
• Siemann, E., Tilman, D., Haarstad, J. & Ritchie, M. 1998. Experimental tests of the dependence of arthropod diversity on plant diversity. Am. Nat. 152: 738–750. doi: 10.1086/286204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Südbeck, P., Andretzke, H., Fischer, S., Gedeon, K., Schikore, T., Schröder, K. & Sudfeldt, C. 2005. Methodenstandards zur Erfassung der Brutvögel Deutschlands. Radolfzell.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, I.R. & Grant, M.C. 2004. Long-term trends in the abundance of breeding Lapwing Vanellus vanellus in relation to land-use change on upland farmland in southern Scotland. Bird Study 51: 133–142. doi: 10.1080/00063650409461345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen, W., Schekkerman, H. & Willems, F. 2006. Predation on meadowbirds in the Netherlands – results of a four-year study. Osnabr. Naturwiss. Mitt. 32: 137–143.
   Google Scholar
• Velthof, G.L., Hoving, I.E., Dolfing, J., Smit, A., Kuikman, P.J. & Oenema, O. 2010. Method and timing of grassland renovation affects herbage yield, nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emission in intensively managed grasslands. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst. 86: 401–412. doi: 10.1007/s10705-009-9302-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Verhulst, J., Kleijn, D. & Berendse, F. 2007. Direct and indirect effects of the most widely implemented Dutch agri-environment schemes on breeding waders. J. Appl. Ecol. 44: 70–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery, J.A., Tallowin, J.R., Feber, R.E., Asteraki, E.J., Atkinson, P.W., Fuller, R.J. & Brown, V.K. 2001. The management of lowland neutral grasslands in Britain: effects of agricultural practices on birds and their food resources. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 647–664. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00626.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A.M., Ausden, M. & Milsom, T.P. 2004. Changes in breeding wader populations in England and Wales: causes and potential solutions. Ibis 146: 32–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00371.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A.M., Vickery, J.A., Brown, A., Langston, R.H.W., Smallshire, D., Wotton, S. & Vanhinsbergh, D. 2005. Changes in the numbers of breeding waders on lowland wet grasslands in England and Wales between 1982 and 2002. Bird Study 52: 55–69. doi: 10.1080/00063650509461374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., Vickery, J. & Pendlebury, C. 2007. Agri-environment schemes as a tool for reversing declining populations of grassland waders: mixed benefits from environmentally sensitive areas in England. Biol. Conserv. 136: 128–135. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamecnik, V., Kubelka, V. & Salek, M. 2017. Visible marking of wader nests to avoid damage by farmers does not increase nest predation. Bird Conserv. Int. 28: 293–301. doi: 10.1017/S0959270916000617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeileis, A. & Hothorn, T. 2002. Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News 2: 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E., Walker, N.J., Saveliev, A.A. & Smith, G.M. (2009). Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar