Diving duck census efficiency based on monitoring of individually marked females: the influence of breeding stage and timing of census

References

• Arnold, T.W. 2010. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaikés information criterion. J Wildl. Manag. 74: 1175–1178. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01236.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D. & Hill, D.A. 2000. Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, L.A. & Kuvlesky, W.P. 2005. North American grassland birds. An unfolding conservation crisis? J. Wildl. Manag. 69: 1–13. doi: 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069<0001:NAGBAU>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information – Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cempulik, P. 1985. Wodno-błotne Non-Passeriformes na stawach rybnych Wielikąt (górny Śląsk). Acta orn. 21: 115–134 (in Polish, with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Chambert, T., Pardo, D., Choquet, R., Staszewski, V., McCoy, K., Tveraa, T. & Boulinier, T. 2012. Heterogeneity in detection probability along the breeding season in black-legged kittiwakes: implications for sampling design. J. Ornithol. 152: 371–380. doi: 10.1007/s10336-010-0542-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R.D. & Jacobson, J.O. 1979. A design for estimating visibility bias in aerial surveys. Biometrics. 35: 735–742. doi: 10.2307/2530104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defos du Rau, P., Barbraud, C. & Mondain-Monval, J. 2003. Estimating breeding population size of the Red-crested Pochard (Netta rufina) in the Camargue (southern France), taking into account detection probability implications for conservation. Anim. Conserv. 6: 379–385. doi: 10.1017/S1367943003003457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defos du Rau, P., Barbraud, C. & Mondain-Mon-val, J.Y. 2005. Incorporating uncertainty into analyses of Red-crested Pochard habitat selection. Biol. Conserv. 125: 355–367. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmberg, J., Nummi, P., Pöysä, H., Sjöberg, K., Gunnarsson, G., Clausen, P., Guillemain, M., Rodrigues, D. & Väänänen, V.M. 2006. The scientific basis for new and sustainable management of migratory European ducks. Wildl. Biol. 12: 121–127. doi: 10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[121:TSBFNA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiala, V. 2008. Náměšťské rybníky a jejich ptactvo 1885–2008. Pobočka ČSO na Vysočině, Jihlava (in Czech, with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R.J., Hutto, R.L. & Haukos, D.A. 2006. Estimating detection probabilities of river birds using double surveys. Auk 123: 695–707. doi: 10.1093/auk/123.3.695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayet, G., Eraud, C., Benmergui, M., Broyer, J., Mesleard, F., Fritz, H. & Guillemain, M. 2011. Breeding mute swan habitat selection when accounting for detectability: a plastic behaviour consistent with rapidly expanding populations. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 57: 1051–1056. doi: 10.1007/s10344-011-0518-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilissen, N., Haanstra, L., Delany, S., Boere, G. & Hagemeijer, W. 2002. Numbers and Distribution of Wintering Waterbirds in the Western Palearctic and Southwest Asia in 1997, 1998 and 1999. Results From the International Waterbird Census. Wetlands International Global Series, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Gollop, J.B. & Marshall, W.H. 1954. A Guide for Aging Duck Broods in the Field. Flyway Council Technical Section, Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemain, M., Poisbleau, M., Denonfoux, L., Lepley, M., Moreau, C., Massez, G., Leray, G., Caizergues, A., Arzel, C., Rodrigues, D. & Fritz, H. 2007. Multiple tests of the effect of nasal saddles on dabbling ducks: combining field and aviary approaches. Bird Study 54: 35–45. doi: 10.1080/00063650709461454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hořák, D., Albrecht, T. & Musil, P. 2002. Vliv nosních značek na chování samic potápivých kachen rodu Aythya. Sylvia. 38: 91–96 (in Czech, with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Janda, J., Pechar, L., Musil, P., Pecharová, E. & Plesník, J. 1996. Sustainable use of Fishponds in the Třeboňsko Protected Landscape Area and Biosphere Reserve. Czech Centre of IUCN Praha a IUCN Gland, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Jantarski, M. 2017. Metody oceny liczebności lęgowych grążyc Aythyini. Ornis Polonica. 58: 117–139 (in Polish, with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Kear, J. 2005. Bird Families of the World: Ducks, Geese and Swans. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, P. & Köhler, U. 1998. Saisonale Dynamik und Bestandetwicklung von mausernden Wasservögel (Anatidae, Podicipedidae, Rallidae) am “ismaninger Speichersee mit Fischteichen”. Anz. Ornithol. Ges. Bayern. 48: 205–240 (in German, with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Koneff, M.D., Royle, J.A., Otto, M.C., Wortham, J.S. & Bidwell, J.K. 2008. A double-observer method to estimate detection rate during aerial waterfowl surveys. J. Wildl. Manag. 72: 1641–1649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskimies, P. & Pöysä, H. 1989. Waterfowl censusing in environmental monitoring: a comparison between point and round counts. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 26: 201–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskimies, P. & Väisänen, R.A. 1991. Monitoring Bird Populations. Zoological Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, J.D., Hines, J.E., Sauer, J.R., Fallon, F.W., Fallon, J.E. & Heglund, P.J. 2000. A double-observer approach for estimating detection probability and abundance from point counts. Auk 117: 393–408. doi: 10.1093/auk/117.2.393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, M. & Black, J.M. 1990. Waterfowl Ecology. Blackie, Glasgow and London.
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, A.M. & Arnold, T.W. 2009a. Estimating detection probabilities of waterfowl broods from ground-based surveys. J. Wildl. Manag. 73: 686–694. doi: 10.2193/2007-524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagano, A.M. & Arnold, T.W. 2009b. Detection probabilities for ground-based breeding waterfowl surveys. J. Wildl. Manag. 73: 392–398. doi: 10.2193/2007-411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagano, A.M., Amundson, C.L., Pieron, M.R., Arnold, T.W. & Kimmel, T.C. 2014. Using sightability-adjusted brood-pair ratios to estimate waterfowl productivity. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 38: 566–573. doi: 10.1002/wsb.422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöysä, H., Kotilainen, J., Väänänen, V.M. & Kunnasrant, M. 2018. Estimating production in ducks: a comparison between ground surveys and unmanned aircraft surveys. Eur. J. Wild. Res. 64: 74. DOI: 10.1007/s10344-018-1238-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöysä, H. & Nummi, P. 1992. Comparing two methods of data collection in waterfowl habitat use studies. Bird Study 39: 124–131. doi: 10.1080/00063659209477109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullin, A.S. 2002. Conservation Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ranoszek, E. 1983. Weryfikacja metod oceny liczebności lęgowych ptaków wodnych w warunkach stawów milickich. Not. orn. 24: 177–201. (in Polish, with German summary).
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, D., Figueiredo, M., Fabião, A. & Tenreiro, P. 2006. Ten years of waterfowl marking in Portugal. main results and future perspectives. In G. C. Boere, C. A. Galbraith & D. A. Stroud. (ed) Waterbirds Around the World, 474–475. The Stationary Office, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Sauder, D.W., Linder, R.L., Dahlgren, R.B. & Tucker, W.L. 1971. An evaluation of the roadside technique for censusing breeding waterfowl. J. Wildl. Manag. 35: 539–543. doi: 10.2307/3799709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, W.J., Newton, I. & Green, R. 2004. Bird Ecology and Conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• van Roomen, M.W.J. & Hustings, F. 1997. Manual Waterbird Projects SOVON (English Edition). SOVON Vogelonderzoek Nederland, Beek-Ubbergen.
   Google Scholar
• Vrtiska, M.P. & Powell, L.A. 2011. Estimates of duck breeding populations in the Nebraska Sandhills using double observer methodology. Waterbirds 34: 96–101. doi: 10.1675/063.034.0112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetlands International. 2006. Waterbird Population Estimates - Fourth Edition. Wetlands International, Wageningen.
   Google Scholar