Leading Developmental Peer Observation of Teaching in Higher Education: Perspectives from Australia and England

References

• Barnard, A., Croft, W., Irons, R., Cuffe, N. and Bandara, W. R. P. (2011) Peer partnership to enhance scholarship of teaching: a case study, Higher Education Research and Development 30 (4), 435–448. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.518953 ​
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, A., Nash, R., McEvoy, K., Shannon, S., Waters, C., Rochester, S., and Bolt, S. (2014). Lead-in: a cultural change model for peer review of teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development. 34 (1), 30-44. doi:10.1037/a0019835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. and Mladenovic, R. (2008) The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development, Higher Education, 55, 735–752. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9093-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M. (2005) Peer Observation Partnerships in Higher Education (Milperra, NSW, HERDSA).
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. (2005). A critical evaluation of peer review via teaching observation within higher education, International Journal of Educational Management, 19 (3), 218–232.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2001) Introduction in making the move to peer learning. In D. Boud, R. Cohen & J. Sampson Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Other (London, Kogan Page Ltd). ​
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Burns, R. B. (2000) Introduction To Research Methods (4th ed.) (London, Sage Publications)
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, C. and O’Loughlin, D. (2014) Peer observation of teaching: enhancing academic engagement for new participants, Innovations in Education and Teaching International 51 (4), 446–456. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.778067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester, A. (2012). Peer partnerships in teaching: evaluation of a voluntary model of professional development in tertiary education, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12 (2), 94–108.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J. (2007) International Human Rights (3rd ed) (BoulderCO, Westview Press). ​
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power (London, Longman).
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. (2002). Models of peer observation of teaching. Paper presented at LTSN Generic Centre Learning and Teaching Support Network, York. August.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. (2005). Peer observation of teaching. SEDA Paper 118. London: Staff and Educational Development Association Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. (2014) Collaborative peer-supported review of teaching. In J. Sachs and M. Parsell (Eds) Peer Review of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, International Perspectives (Netherlands, Springer), 13–31
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley-Fletcher, L. and Orsmond, P. (2004) Evaluating our peers: is peer observation a meaningful process? Studies in Higher Education 29 (4), 489–503. doi:10.1080/0307507042000236380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, J. (2013) Educational developers as researchers: the contribution of insider research to enhancing understanding of role, identity and practice, Innovations in Education and Teaching International 50 (4), 388–398. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.806220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K-L., Farrell, K., Bell, M., Devlin, M., and James, R. (2008). Peer Review Of Teaching Inaustralian Higher Education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council
   Google Scholar
• Henard, F. and Roseveare, D. (2012). Fostering quality teaching in higher education: policies and practices. An IMHE guide for higher education institutions. OECD: Institutional Management in Higher Education. http://www.oecd.org/edu/imhe/QT%20policies%20and%20practices.pdf (Accessed 28 October 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I., (1994) The interpretation of documents and material culture. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (Thousand Oaks, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Houston, D. J. (2007) TQM and higher education: a critical systems perspective on fitness for purpose, Quality in Higher Education, 13, 3–17. doi:10.1080/13538320701272672
   Google Scholar
• Klopper, C. and Drew, S. (Eds) (2015) Teaching for Learning and Learning for Teaching (Rotterdam, AW, Sense Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Knights, D. and McCabe, D. (2000) Ain’t misbehavin’? Opportunities for resistance under new forms of ‘quality’ management, Sociology, 34, 421–436.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, L. and Nicholls, G. (2005) Enhancing teaching quality through peer review of teaching, Quality In Higher Education 11 (2), 137–149. doi:10.1080/13538320500175118
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M. (2013) Surveillance, performativity and normalised practice: the use and impact of graded lesson observations in further education colleges, Journal of Further and Higher Education 37 (5), 694–714. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2012.684036
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Peel, D. (2005) Peer observation as a transformatory tool? Teaching in Higher Education 10 (4), 489–504. doi:10.1080/13562510500239125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, K. M. (2011) Developing the Whole Student: Leading Higher Education Initiatives (London, Leadership Foundation for Higher Education).
   Google Scholar
• Robson, J. (1998) A profession in crisis: status, culture and identity in the further education college, Culture And Identity In The Further Education College. Journal Of Vocational Education And Training 50, (4), 585–607. doi:10.1080/13636829800200073
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. and Parsell, M. (2014) The place of peer review in learning and teaching. In J. Sachs and M. Parsell (Eds) Peer Review of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, International Perspectives (Netherlands, Springer), 13–31
   Google Scholar
• Shah, M. and Jarzabkowski, L. (2013). The Australian higher education quality assurance framework, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 17 (3), 96–106.
   Google Scholar
• Shortland, S. (2004) Peer observation: a tool for staff development or compliance? Journal of Further and Higher Education 28 (2), 219–228. doi:10.1080/0309877042000206778
   Google Scholar
• Skelton, A. (2012) Colonised by quality? Teacher identities in a research-led institution, British Journal of Sociology of Education 33 (6), 793–811. doi:10.1080/01425692.2012.692047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speck, M. (1996) Best Practice in Professional Development for Sustained Educational Change (USA, ERS Spectrum), 33–41. ​
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P. R. and Knight, P. T. (2000) Coming to know in higher education: theorising faculty entry to new work contexts, Higher Education Research & Development 19 (1), 27–42. doi:10.1080/07294360050020453
   Google Scholar
• Wingrove, D., Clarke, A. and Chester, A. (2015) Distributing leadership for sustainable peer feedback on tertiary teaching, Journal of University Teaching and Learning, 12 (3), article 8, 1-14​.
   Google Scholar