Exploring the use of residual variance for uniformity of body weight in meat quail lines using Bayesian inference

References

• Barbieri, A., R. K. Ono, L. L. Cursino, M. M. Farah, M. P. Pires, T. S. Bertipaglia, A. V. Pires, L. Cavani, L. O. D. Carreno, and R. Fonseca. 2015. “Genetic Parameters for Body Weight in Meat Quail.” Poultry Science 94 (2): 169–171. doi:10.3382/ps/peu062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felleki, M., and N. Lundeheim. 2015. “Genetic Heteroscedasticity of Teat Count in Pigs.” Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 132 (5): 392–398. doi:10.1111/jbg.12134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foomani, N. N., S. Zerehdaran, M. Ahani Azari, and E. Lotfi. 2014. “Genetic Parameters for Feed Efficiency and Body Weight Traits in Japanese Quail.” British Poultry Science 55 (3): 298–304. doi:10.1080/00071668.2014.925088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geweke, J. 1991. “Evaluating the Accuracy of Sampling-Based Approaches to the Calculation of Posterior Moments.” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Department Staff Report 148.
   Google Scholar
• Gorssen, W., N. Buys, and S. Janssens. 2018. “Genetic Parameters For Uniformity Of Fattening Pigs ’ Growth Traits.” Proceedings of the World Congreess on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, W. G., and X. Zhang. 2004. “Effects on Phenotypic Variability of Directional Selection Arising through Genetic Differences in Residual Variability.” Genetical Research 83 (2): 121–132. doi:10.1017/S0016672304006640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, IBGE. 2018. “Produção Da Pecuária Municipal.” 16, 2018. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/84/ppm_2018_v46_br_informativo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Iung, L. H. S., R. Carvalheiro, H. H. R. Neves, and H. A. Mulder. 2019. “Genetics and Genomics of Uniformity and Resilience in Livestock and Aquaculture Species : A Review.” Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 136 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1111/jbg.12454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karami, K., S. Zerehdaran, M. Tahmoorespour, B. Barzanooni, and E. Lotfi. 2017. “Genetic Evaluation of Weekly Body Weight in Japanese Quail Using Random Regression Models.” British Poultry Science 1–6. doi:10.1080/00071668.2016.1236362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukanov, H. 2019. “Domestic Quail (Coturnix Japonica Domestica), Is There Such Farm Animal ?” World’s Poultry Science Journal 75 (4 December): 1–11. doi:10.1017/S0043933919000631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misztal, I., S. Tsuruta, T. Strabel, B. Auvray, T. Druet, and D. Lee. 2002. “BLUPF90 and Related Programs (BGF90).” Proceedings, 7h World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, H. A., P. Bijma, and W. G. Hill. 2008. “Selection for Uniformity in Livestock by Exploiting Genetic Heterogeneity of Residual Variance.” Genetics, Selection, Evolution: GSE 40 (1): 37–59. doi:10.1051/gse:2007034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, H. A., P. Gienapp, and M. E. Visser. 2016. “Genetic Variation in Variability : Phenotypic Variability of Fledging Weight and Its Evolution in a Songbird Population.” Evolution 70 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1111/evo.13008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulder, H. A., W. G. Hill, A. Vereijken, and R. F. Veerkamp. 2009. “Estimation of Genetic Variation in Residual Variance in Female and Male Broiler Chickens.” Animal 3 (12): 1673–1680. doi:10.1017/S1751731109990668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves, H. H. R., R. Carvalheiro, and S. A. Queiroz. 2012. “Genetic and Environmental Heterogeneity of Residual Variance of Weight Traits in Nellore Beef Cattle.” Genetics Selection Evolution 44 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-44-19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neves, H. H. R., R. Carvalheiro, V. M. Roso, and S. Queiroz. 2011. “Genetic Variability of Residual Variance of Production Traits in Nellore Beef Cattle.” Livestock Science 142 (1–3): 164–169. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paiva, J. T., M. D. V. Resende, R. T. Resende, H. R. Oliveira, H. T. Silva, G. C. Caetano, A. A. Calderano, P. S. Lopes, J. M. S. Viana, and F. F. Silva. 2018a. “A Note on Transgenerational Epigenetics Affecting Egg Quality Traits in Meat-Type Quail.” British Poultry Science 1. doi:10.1080/00071668.2018.1514582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paiva, J. T., M. D. V. Resende, R. T. Resende, H. R. Oliveira, H. T. Silva, G. C. Caetano, P. S. Lopes, and F. F. Silva. 2018b. “Transgenerational Epigenetic Variance for Body Weight in Meat Quail.” Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 135 (3): 178–185. doi:10.1111/jbg.12329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ros, M., D. Sorensen, R. Waagepetersen, M. Dupont-Nivet, M. Sancristobal, J.-C. Bonnet, and J. Mallard. 2004. “Evidence for Genetic Control of Adult Weight Plasticity in the Snail Helix Aspersa.” Genetics 168 (4): 2089–2097. doi:10.1534/genetics.104.032672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roso, V. M., and F. S. Schenkel. 2006. “AMC -A Computer Program to Assess the Degree of Connectedness among Contemporary Groups.” 8th World Congress o Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 2, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
   Google Scholar
• Roso, V. M., F. S. Schenkel, and S. P. Miller. 2004. “Degree of Connectedness among Groups of Centrally.” Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84 (1): 37–47. doi:10.4141/A02-094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, S. J., I. M. S. White, S. Avedaño, and W. G. Hill. 2006. “Genetic Heterogeneity of Residual Variance in Broiler Chickens.” Genetics Selection Evolution 38 (6): 617–635. doi:10.1051/gse:2006025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sae-lim, P., H. L. Khaw, H. M. Nielsen, V. Puvanendran, O. Hansen, and A. Mortensen. 2020. “Genetic Variance for Uniformity of Body Weight in Lumpfish (Cyclopterus Lumpus) Used a Double Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model.” Aquaculture 514: 734515. (September 2019). doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefton, A. E., and P. B. Siegel. 1974. “Body Weight Relationships of Newly Hatched Japanese Quail.” Poultry Science 53 (3): 1254–1256. doi:10.3382/ps.0531254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell-Kubiak, E., N. Duijvesteijn, M. S. Lopes, L. L. G. Janss, E. F. Knol, P. Bijma, and H. A. Mulder. 2015. “Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Novel Loci for Litter Size and Its Variability in a Large White Pig Population.” BMC Genomics 16 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2273-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sell-Kubiak, E., P. Bijma, E. F. Knol, and H. A. Mulder. 2015. “Comparison of Methods to Study Uniformity of Traits : Application to Birth Weight in Pigs 1.” Journal Animal Science 93 (3): 900–911. doi:10.2527/jas2014-8313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, L. P., J. C. Ribeiro, A. C. Crispim, F. G. Silva, C. M. Bonafé, F. F. Silva, and R. A. Torres. 2013. “Genetic Parameters of Body Weight and Egg Traits in Meat-Type Quail.” Livestock Production Science 153 (1–3): 27–32. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2013.01.014.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, D., and D. Gianola. 2002. Likelihood, Bayesian, and MCMC Methods in Quantitative Genetics. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zonuz, A. Y., S. Alijani, and S. A. Rafat. 2019. “Genetic Heterogeneity of Residual Variance of Hatch Weight in Mazandaran Native Chicken.” British Poultry Science 60 (4): 366–372. doi:10.1080/00071668.2019.1614527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar