The British Ixworth: individual growth and egg production of a purebred dual-purpose chicken

References

• Adler, C., I. Tiemann, S. Hillemacher, A. J. Schmithausen, U. Müller, S. Heitmann, B. Spindler, N. Kemper, and W. Büscher. 2020. “Effects of a Partially Perforated Flooring System on Animal Based Welfare Indicators in Broiler Housing.” Poultry Science 99 (7): 3343–3354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albentosa, M. J., J. B. Kjaer, and C. J. Nicol. 2003. “Strain and Age Differences in Behaviour, Fear Response and Pecking Tendency in Laying Hens.” British Poultry Science 44 (3): 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660310001598085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allonby, J. I. H., and P. B. Wilson, Eds. 2018. British Poultry Standards. Complete Specifications and Judging Points of All Standardized Breeds and Varieties of Poultry as Compiled by the Specialist Affiliated Breed Clubs and Recognized by the Poultry Club of Great Britain. Chichester, UK; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Almasi, A., Z. Suto, Z. Budai, T. Donko, G. Milisits, and P. Horn. 2012. “Effect of Age, Sex and Strain on Growth, Body Composition and Carcass Characteristics of Dual Purpose Type Chicken.” World Poultry Congress. Book of Abstracts. 285–288. Salvador, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Aviagen. 2022. “Broiler Performance Objectives – Ross 308, Ross 308 FF”. Accessed November 15, 2022 https://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/RossxRoss308-BroilerPerformanceObjectives2022-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Baldinger, L., and R. Bussemas. 2021. “Dual-Purpose Production of Eggs and Meat — Part 1: Cockerels of Crosses Between Layer and Meat Breeds Achieve Moderate Growth Rates While Showing Unimpaired Animal Welfare.” Organic Agriculture 11 (3): 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-021-00357-z.
   Google Scholar
• Barbato, G. F. 1999. “Genetic Relationships Between Selection for Growth and Reproductive Effectiveness.” Poultry Science 78 (3): 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.3.444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, J. 2018. The Chicken. “Breeds”. S. 162. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Corion, M., J. Keresztes, B. D. Ketelaere, and W. Saeys. 2022. “In Ovo Sexing of Eggs from Brown Breeds with a Gender-Specific Color Using Visible-Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: Effect of Incubation Day and Measurement Configuration.” Poultry Science 101 (5): 101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damme, K., S. Urselmans, and E. Schmidt. 2015. “Economics of Dual-Purpose Breeds–A Comparison of Meat and Egg Production Using Dual Purpose Breeds versus Conventional Broiler and Layer Strains.” Lohmann Information 50:4–9. Available online: https://lohmann-breeders.com/media/2020/06/2015-LOHMANN-dual.pdf (accessed on 31 August 2023).
   Google Scholar
• EC 589/2008. 2008. “Commission Regulation (EC) No 589/2008 of 23 June 2008 Laying Down Detailed Rules for Implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as Regards Marketing Standards for Eggs.” Official Journal of the European Communities L163:6–23. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008R0589 (accessed on 31 August 2023)
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, T. P., S. Szász, A. Orbán, D. Mezőszentgyörgyi, L. Pető, and Z. Sütő. 2022. “Examination of Nesting Behavior of Laying Hens of Different Genotypes Housed in Indoor Alternative Pens Using a Video System.” Applied Sciences 12 (18): 9093. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189093.
   Google Scholar
• Freick, M., M. Herzog, S. Rump, I. Vogt, J. Weber, W. John, and R. Schreiter. 2022. “Incubation Characteristics, Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality of Saxonian Chicken and German Langshan Bantam Breeds in a Free-Range Rearing System.” Veterinary Medicine and Science 8 (4): 1578–1593. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangnat, I. D. M., S. Mueller, M. Kreuzer, R. E. Messikommer, M. Siegrist, and V. H. M. Visschers. 2018. “Swiss consumers’ Willingness to Pay and Attitudes Regarding Dual-Purpose Poultry and Eggs.” Poultry Science 97 (3): 1089–1098. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garces, A., N. Casey, and P. Horst. 2001. “Productive Performance of Naked Neck, Frizzle and Dwarf Laying Hens Under Various Natural Climates and Two Nutritional Treatments.” South African Journal of Animal Science 31 (3). https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v31i3.3800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giersberg, M. F., B. Spindler, and N. Kemper. 2017. “Assessment of Plumage and Integument Condition in Dual-Purpose Breeds and Conventional Layers.” Animals 7 (12): 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7120097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giersberg, M. F., B. Spindler, and N. Kemper. 2020. “Are Dual-Purpose Hens Less Fearful Than Conventional Layer Hybrids?” Veterinary Record 187 (5): e35–e35. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, S. 2002. “Effect of Breed Suitability, System Design and Management on Welfare & Performance in Traditional & Organic Poultrymeat (OF0153)”. ADAS Consulting Ltd, Gleadthorpe. Available online: https://orgprints.org/id/eprint/8104/ (accessed on 31 August 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, P. M., M. Bain, C. E. Channing, R. Fleming, and S. Wilson. 2003. “Genetic Variation for Egg Production, Egg Quality and Bone Strength in Selected and Traditional Breeds of Laying Fowl.” British Poultry Science 44 (3): 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000085535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaer, J. B., P. Sørensen, and G. Su. 2001. “Divergent Selection on Feather Pecking Behaviour in Laying Hens (Gallus Gallus Domesticus).” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71 (3): 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00184-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krautwald-junghanns, M.-E., K. Cramer, B. Fischer, A. Förster, R. Galli, F. Kremer, E. U. Mapesa, et al. 2018. “Current Approaches to Avoid the Culling of Day-Old Male Chicks in the Layer Industry, with Special Reference to Spectroscopic Methods.” Poultry Science 97 (3): 749–757. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertz, C., K. Wuthijaree, and M. Gauly. 2018. “Performance, Behavior, and Health of Male Broilers and Laying Hens of 2 Dual-Purpose Chicken Genotypes.” Poultry Science 97 (10): 3564–3576. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenstra, F. R., P. van Horne, and M. M. van Krimpen. 2010. “Dual Purpose Chickens, Exploration of Technical, Environmental and Economical Feasibility”. XIIIth European Poultry Conference. Tours, France.
   Google Scholar
• Li, N., Z. Ren, D. Li, and L. Zeng. 2020. “Review: Automated Techniques for Monitoring the Behaviour and Welfare of Broilers and Laying Hens: Towards the Goal of Precision Livestock Farming.” Animal: An International Journal of Animal Bioscience 14 (3): 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119002155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann Tierzucht GmbH. 2022. “Lohmann Brown Classics”. Layers. Accessed March 12, 2022 https://lohmann-breeders.com/de/strains/lohmann-brown-classic-alternative/.
   Google Scholar
• Meuser, V., L. Weinhold, S. Hillemacher, and I. Tiemann. 2021. “Welfare-Related Behaviors in Chickens: Characterization of Fear and Exploration in Local and Commercial Chicken Strains.” Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI 11 (3): 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030679.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, S., M. Kreuzer, M. Siegrist, K. Mannale, R. E. Messikommer, and I. D. M. Gangnat. 2018. “Carcass and Meat Quality of Dual-Purpose Chickens (Lohmann Dual, Belgian Malines, Schweizerhuhn) in Comparison to Broiler and Layer Chicken Types.” Poultry Science 97 (9): 3325–3336. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muth, P. C., S. Ghaziani, I. Klaiber, and A. Valle Zárate. 2018. “Are Carcass and Meat Quality of Male Dual-Purpose Chickens Competitive Compared to Slow-Growing Broilers Reared Under a Welfare-Enhanced Organic System?” Organic Agriculture 8 (1): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-016-0173-3.
   Google Scholar
• Nolte, T., S. Jansen, I. Halle, A. M. Scholz, H. Simianer, A. R. Sharifi, and S. Weigend. 2020. “Egg Production and Bone Stability of Local Chicken Breeds and Their Crosses Fed with Faba Beans.” Animals 10 (9): 1480. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte, T., S. Jansen, S. Weigend, D. Moerlein, I. Halle, W. Link, J. Hummel, H. Simianer, and A. R. Sharifi. 2020. “Growth Performance of Local Chicken Breeds, a High-Performance Genotype and Their Crosses Fed with Regional Faba Beans to Replace Soy.” Animals 10 (4): 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oke, U. K., U. Herbert, and E. N. Nwachukwu. 2004. “Association Between Body Weight and Some Egg Production Traits in the Guinea Fowl (Numida Meleagris Galeata. Pallas).” Livestock Research for Rural Development 16 (72). Available online: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/9/oke16072.htm (accessed on 31 August 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Reithmayer, C., and O. Mußhoff. 2019. “Consumer Preferences for Alternatives to Chick Culling in Germany.” Poultry Science 98 (10): 4539–4548. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzi, C. 2020. “Laying Hen Biodiversity: A Study on the Effect of Age on the Yield Performance and Quality of Eggs Produced by Two Italian Purebred Hens.” Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica 23 (Monothematic Issue): 296–304. https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2020.23.mi-fpap.296-304.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, D. A., G. R. Nute, and P. M. Hocking. 2009. “Quantifying the Effects of Genetic Selection and Genetic Variation for Body Size, Carcass Composition, and Meat Quality in the Domestic Fowl (Gallus Domesticus).” Poultry Science 88 (5): 923–931. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siekmann, L., L. Meier-dinkel, S. Janisch, B. Altmann, C. Kaltwasser, C. Sürie, and C. Krischek. 2018. “Carcass Quality, Meat Quality and Sensory Properties of the Dual-Purpose Chicken Lohmann Dual.” Foods (Basel, Switzerland) 7 (10): 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7100156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, P., T. Okeno, and A. J. Buitenhuis. 2017. “The Motivation of Hens to Lay Eggs on the Floor in Non-Cage Systems Has a Heritable Background.” European Poultry Science (EPS) 81. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2017.192.
   Google Scholar
• Tiemann, I., S. Hillemacher, and M. Wittmann. 2020. “Are Dual-Purpose Chickens Twice as Good? Measuring Performance and Animal Welfare Throughout the Fattening Period.” Animals 10 (11): 1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10111980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierschutz-Nutztierhaltungsverordnung. Verordnung zum Schutz Landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere und Anderer zur Erzeugung Tierischer Produkte Gehaltener Tiere bei Ihrer Haltung. BGBl 2006 (last revision 2021), IS 2043. Available online: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tierschnutztv/BJNR275800001.html (accessed on 31 August 2023). (In German).
   Google Scholar
• Tixier-boichard, M., F. Leenstra, D. Flock, P. M. Hocking, and S. Weigend. 2012. “A Century of Poultry Genetics.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 68:307–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933912000360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, A., P. C. Muth, J. Capote, C. Rodríguez, M. Fresno, and A. Valle Zárate. 2019. “Suitability of Dual-Purpose Cockerels of 3 Different Genetic Origins for Fattening Under Free-Range Conditions.” Poultry Science 98 (12): 6564–6571. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigend, S., U. Janssen-tapken, M. Erbe, U. Ober, A. Weigend, R. Preisinger, and H. Simianer. 2014. “Potentials of Biodiversity in Chickens.” Züchtungskunde 86 (1):25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., P. Wiener, D. Teverson, C. S. Haley, and P. M. Hocking. 2012. “Characterization of the Genetic Diversity, Structure and Admixture of British Chicken Breeds.” Animal Genetics 43 (5): 552–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02296.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar