A Controversy Over the Existence of Fictional Objects: Husserl and Ingarden on Imagination and Fiction

References

• Aldea, A.S. “Husserl’s Struggle with Mental Images: Imaging and Imagining Reconsidered.” Continental Philosophy Review 46.3 (2013): 371–94. doi:10.1007/s11007-013-9268-7. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostar, L. “Reading Ingarden Read Husserl: Metaphysics, Ontology, and Phenomenological Method.” Husserl Studies 10.3 (1993): 211–36. doi:10.1007/BF01386690. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, E.S. Imagining. A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington–Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Chrudzimski, A. Die Erkenntnistheorie von Roman Ingarden. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4576-3. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Cobos, J.E.C. “The Many Senses of Imagination and the Manifestation of Fiction: A View from Husserl’s Phenomenology of Phantasy.” Husserl Studies 29.2 (2013): 143–62. doi:10.1007/s10743-012-9117-2. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, T. The Objects of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, G. The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D. “Fiction.” The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. Eds. B. Gaut and D.M. Lopes. London, New York: Routledge, 2001. 263–73. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Drost, M. “The Primacy of Perception in Husserl’s Theory of Imagining.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50.3 (1990): 569–82. Print. doi: 10.2307/2108165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, J.J. Husserlian Intentionality and Non-Foundational Realism. Noema and Object. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1974-7. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ferencz-Flatz, C. “Gibt es perzeptive Phantasie? Als-ob-Bewusstsein, Widerstreit und Neutralität in Husserls Aufzeichnungen zur Bildbetrachtung.” Husserl Studies 25 (2009): 235–53. doi:10.1007/s10743-009-9062-x. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Føllesdal, D. “The thetic role of consciousness.” Husserl’s Logical Investigations Reconsidered. Ed. D. Fisette. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003. 11–20. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0207-2_2. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Geniusas, S. The Origins of the Horizon in Husserl’s Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4644-2. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, G. “The paradox of objectless presentations in early phenomenology: A brief history of the intentional object from Bolzano to Husserl, with concise analyses of the positions of Brentano, Frege, Twardowski, and Meinong.” Studia Phaenomenologica 15 (2015): 67–91. Print. doi: 10.5840/studphaen2015155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Experience and Judgment. Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Aufsätze und Vorträge (1890-1910). The Hague: Kluwer, 1979. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1980. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book. General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1983. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Aufsätze und Vorträge (1922-1937). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Briefwechsel. Band I. Die Brentanoschule. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Briefwechsel. Band III. Die Göttinger Schule. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book. Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. 5th edition. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Logical Investigations. Vol. 2. 5th edition. London: Routledge, 2001. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Natur und Geist. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1927. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Erster Teil. Entwürfe zur Umarbeitung der VI. Untersuchung und zur Vorrede für die Neuauflage der Logischen Untersuchungen (Sommer 1913). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Natur und Geist. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1919. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1893-1912). Dordrecht: Springer, 2004. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898–1925). Dordrecht: Springer, 2005. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. “Essentiale Fragen. Ein Beitrag zu dem Wesensproblem.” Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 7 (1925): 125–304. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. “Bemerkungen zum Problem ‘Idealismus-Realismus’.” Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, Ergänzungsband 10 (1929): 159–90. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt. II/1. Formalontologie 1. Teil. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1965. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt. II/2. Formalontologie 2. Teil. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1965. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. U podstaw teorii poznania. Część pierwsza. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1971. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. The Literary Work of Art. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. On the Motives which led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism. Den Haag: Nijhoff, 1975. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. Controversy over the Existence of the World. Vol. I. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Edition, 2013. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. “On the development of Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology of imagination and its use for interdisciplinary research.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4.2 (2005): 121–32. doi:10.1007/s11097-005-0135-9. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. “Husserl.” The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination. Ed. A. Kind. New York: Routledge, 2016. 69–81. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kortooms, T. Phenomenology of Time. Edmund Husserl’s Analysis of Time-Consciousness. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002. Print. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9918-4. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kosowski, Ł. Noema and Thinkability: An Essay on Husserl’s Theory of Intentionality. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2010. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kriegel, U. The Varieties of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kuspit, D.B. “Fiction and Phenomenology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29.1 (1968): 16–33. doi:10.2307/2105815. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D.M. “Induction and Husserl’s Theory of Eidetic Variation.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29.1 (1968): 1–15. doi:10.2307/2105814. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmar, D. “On the Function of Weak Phantasmata in Perception: Phenomenological, Psychological and Neurological Clues for the Transcendental Function of Imagination in Perception.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4.2 (2005): 155–67. doi:10.1007/s11097-005-0137-7. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmar, D. “On the Constitution of the Time of the World: The Emergence of Objective Time on the Ground of Subjective Time.” On Time – New Contributions to the Husserlian Phenomenology of Time. Eds. D. Lohmar and I. Yamaguchi. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010. 115–36. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8766-9_6. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmar, D. “Synthesis in Husserls Phänomenologie. Das grundlegende Modell von Auffassung und aufgefaßtem Inhalt in Wahrnehmung, Erkennen und Zeitkonstitution.” Metaphysik als Wissenschaft. Festschrift für Klaus Düsing zum 65. Geburtstag. Ed. D. Fonfara. Freiburg, München: Verlag Karl Alber, 2016. 387–408. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Marbach, E. Towards a Phenomenological Analysis of Fictional Intentionality and Reference. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.3 (2013): 428–47. doi:10.1080/09672559.2013.801631. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitscherling, J. Roman Ingarden’s Ontology and Aesthetics. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1997. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, J.N. Between Essentialism and Transcendental Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1997. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Schmicking, D. “Is There Imaginary Loudness? Reconsidering Phenomenological Method.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4.2 (2005): 169–82. doi:10.1007/s11097-005-7597-7. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert, J. and Smith, B. “The Truth about Fiction.” Kunst und Ontologie. Für Roman Ingarden zum 100. Geburtstag. Eds. W. Galewicz, E. Ströker and W. Stróżewski. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1994. 97–118. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, P. “Ingarden and the Ontology of Dependence.” Existence, Culture, and Persons. The Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Ed. A. Chrudzimski. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2005. 39–53. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. “Review of The Literary Work of Art.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 6.2 (1975): 141–44. Print. doi: 10.1080/00071773.1975.11006419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. “Ingarden vs. Meinong on the Logic of Fiction.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41.1–2 (1980): 93–105. doi:10.2307/2107393. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D.W. and McIntyre, R. Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1982. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolowski, R. “The logic of parts and wholes in Husserl’s Investigations.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 28.4 (1968): 537–53. doi:10.2307/2105690. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, K. “Imagination and Fiction.” The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination. Ed. A. Kind. New York: Routledge, 2016. 204–16. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Szanto, T. Bewusstsein, Intentionalität und mentale Repräsentation. Husserl und die analytische Philosophie des Geistes. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A.L. “Fiction and Intentionality.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56.2 (1996): 277–98. doi:10.2307/2108520. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A.L. Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A.L. “Ingarden and the Ontology of Cultural Objects.” Existence, Culture, Persons: The Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Ed. A. Chrudzimski. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2005. 115–36. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. “Look Again: Phenomenology and Mental Imagery.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6.1–2 (2007): 137–70. doi:10.1007/s11097-006-9031-1. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. “Representationalism and the Phenomenology of Mental Imagery.” Synthese 160.3 (2008): 397–415. doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9086-0. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallner, I.M. “In defense of Husserl’s transcendental idealism: Roman Ingarden’s critique re-examined.” Husserl Studies 4.1 (1987): 3–43. doi:10.1007/BF00375881. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, K.L. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press, 1990. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Willard, D. “Wholes, Parts, and the Objectivity of Knowledge.” Parts and Moments. Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology. Ed. B. Smith. München: Philosophia Verlag, 1982. 379–400. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Willard, D. “The Theory of Wholes and Parts and Husserl’s Explication of the Possibility of Knowledge in the Logical Investigations.” Husserl’s Logical Investigations Reconsidered. Ed. D. Fisette. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003. 163–82. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0207-2_11. Print.
   Google Scholar