The Effects of Participatory Budgeting on Local Government Service Delivery: Evidence From Sumedang

REFERENCES

• Abadie, Alberto, Alexis Diamond and Jens Hainmueller. 2010. ‘Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program’. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105 (490): 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadie, Alberto, Alexis Diamond and Jens Hainmueller. 2011. ‘Synth: An R Package for Synthetic Control Methods in Comparative Case Studies’. Journal of Statistical Software 42 (13): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadie, Alberto, Alexis Diamond and Jens Hainmueller. 2015. ‘Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method’. American Journal of Political Science 59 (2): 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadie, Alberto and Javier Gardeazabal. 2003. ‘The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country’. American Economic Review 93 (1): 113–32. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abers, Rebecca Neaera. 2000. Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, John. 2004. ‘Co-governance for Accountability: Beyond “Exit” and “Voice”‘. World Development 32 (3): 447–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alatas, Vivi, Abhijit Banerjee, Rema Hanna, Benjamin A. Olken and Julia Tobias. 2012. ‘Targeting the Poor: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia’. American Economic Review 102 (4): 1206–40. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.4.1206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, Patrick Heller, Shubham Chaudhuri and Marcelo Kunrath Silva. 2006. ‘Evaluating Empowerment: Participatory Budgeting in Brazilian Municipalities’. In Empowerment in Practice: From Analysis to Implementation, edited by Ruth Alsop, Mette Bertelsen and Jeremy Holland, 95–124. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6450-5
   Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, Patrick Heller and Marcelo Kunrath Silva. 2011. Bootstrapping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, Timothy, Rohini Pande and Vijayendra Rao. 2005. ‘Participatory Democracy in Action: Survey Evidence from South India’. Journal of the European Economic Association 3 (2–3): 648–57. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuermann, Diether W. and Maria Amelina. 2014. ‘Does Participatory Budgeting Improve Decentralized Public Service Delivery?’ IDB Working Paper Series 547. Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/6699
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, Carew and Brian Wampler. 2010. ‘Voice, Votes, and Resources: Evaluating the Effect of Participatory Democracy on Well-being’. World Development 38 (1): 125–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, Derick W. and Omar Azfar. 2006. ‘Decentralization and Community Empowerment: Does Community Empowerment Deepen Democracy and Improve Service Delivery?’ Paper prepared for US Agency for International Development Office of Democracy and Governance. Washington, DC: RTI International. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnadh325.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cabannes, Yves. 2004. ‘Participatory Budgeting: A Significant Contribution to Participatory Democracy’. Environment and Urbanization 16 (1): 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780401600104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabannes, Yves. 2015. ‘The Impact of Participatory Budgeting on Basic Services: Municipal Practices and Evidence from the Field’. Environment and Urbanization 27 (1): 257–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815572297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, Aniruddha and Victoria A. Beard. 2007. ‘Community Driven Development, Collective Action and Elite Capture in Indonesia’. Development and Change 38 (2): 229–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaghy, Maureen M. 2011. ‘Do Participatory Governance Institutions Matter? Municipal Councils and Social Housing Programs in Brazil’. Comparative Politics 44 (1): 83–102. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041510X13815229366606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faguet, Jean-Paul. 2014. ‘Decentralization and Governance’. World Development 53 (2): 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Ferman, Bruno, Cristine Pinto and Vitor Possebom. 2018. ‘Cherry Picking with Synthetic Controls’. MPRA Paper No. 85138. Sao Paulo School of Economics (FGV EESP). https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85138/
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Jonathan A. 2015. ‘Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?’ World Development 72: 346–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011
   Google Scholar
• Fritzen, Scott A. 2007. ‘Can the Design of Community-Driven Development Reduce the Risk of Elite Capture? Evidence from Indonesia’. World Development 35 (8): 1359–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, Archon and Erik Olin Wright. 2003. ‘Thinking about Empowered Participatory Governance’. In Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, edited by Archon Fung and Erik Olin Wright, 3–42. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2007. ‘Lessons from Latin America’s Experience with Participatory Budgeting’. In Participatory Budgeting, edited by Anwar Shah, 91–126. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6640
   Google Scholar
• Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2011. Deepening Local Democracy in Latin America: Participation, Decentralization and the Left. Pennsylvania, PA: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, Sónia. 2014. ‘The Effects of Participatory Budgeting on Municipal Expenditures and Infant Mortality in Brazil’. World Development 53: 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillos, Tara. 2017. ‘Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-staged Process in Solo, Indonesia’. World Development 96: 343–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harun, Harun, Peter Graham, Haryono P. Kamase and Monir Mir. 2021. ‘A Critical Analysis of the Impacts of Financial Literacy and NPM on Village Funds Initiative in Indonesia’. International Journal of Public Administration 44 (4): 336–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1722165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, Bert and Kai Kaiser. 2004. ‘The Making of the “Big Bang” and Its Aftermath: A Political Economy Perspective’. In Reforming Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and the Rebuilding of Indonesia: The ‘Big Bang’ Program and Its Economic Consequences, edited by James Alm, Jorge Martinez-Vazquez and Sri Mulyani Indrawati, 15–46. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845421656.00007
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, A. N. M. Zakir, Anwara Begum, Muhammad Shafiul Alam and Md. Shahidul Islam. 2014. ‘Participatory Budgeting in Bangladesh Local Government Context’. Public Administration Research 3 (2): 28–43. https://doi.org/10.5539/par.v3n2p28
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo, Miguel and Lorena Alcázar. 2013. ‘Does Participatory Budgeting Have an Effect on the Quality of Public Services? The Case of Peru’s Water and Sanitation Sector’. IDB Working Paper Series 386. Washington, DC: Water and Sanitation Division, InterAmerican Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/4235
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo, Miguel and Glenn Daniel Wright. 2015. ‘Participatory Democracy and Effective Policy: Is There a Link? Evidence from Rural Peru’. World Development 66: 280–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul, Ashok, Stefan Klößner, Gregor Pfeifer and Manuel Schieler. 2018. ‘Synthetic Control Methods: Never Use All Pre-intervention Outcomes together with Covariates’. Working paper. Saarland University and University of Hohenheim. http://www.oekonometrie.uni-saarland.de/papers/SCM_Predictors.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kis-Katos, Krisztina and Bambang Suharnoko Sjahrir. 2017. ‘The Impact of Fiscal and Political Decentralization on Local Public Investment in Indonesia’. Journal of Comparative Economics 45 (2): 344–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2017.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Blane D. 2014. ‘Indonesian Intergovernmental Performance Grants: An Empirical Assessment of Impact’. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 50 (3): 415–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2014.980378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Blane D. 2017. ‘Local Government Spending and Service Delivery in Indonesia: The Perverse Effects of Substantial Fiscal Resources’. Regional Studies 51 (11): 1695–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1216957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Blane D. 2018. ‘Local Government Form in Indonesia: Tax, Expenditure, and Efficiency Effects’. Studies in Comparative International Development 53 (1): 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-017-9236-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Blane D., Neil McCulloch and Audrey Sacks. 2016. ‘Measuring Local Government Service Delivery Performance: Challenges and (Partial) Solutions in Indonesia’. Journal of International Development 28 (5): 808–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumley, Thomas. 2010. Complex Surveys: A Guide to Analysis Using R. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lumley, Thomas. 2019. ‘Survey: Analysis of Complex Survey Samples’. Last modified: 27 April 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survey
   Google Scholar
• Muluk, Saeful and Ria R. Djohani. 2007. ‘Praktik Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan di Kabupaten Sumedang: Inovasi yang Memberikan Harapan’ [The Practice of Participatory Planning in Sumedang District: An Innovation that Brings Hope]. Inisiatif, Forum Pengembangan Partisipasi Masyarakat and Asia Foundation. http://inisiatif.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/07-Musrenbang-Kabupaten-Sumedang-Inovasi-yg-Memberikan-Harapan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muluk, Saeful and Nandang Suherman. 2011. ‘Institutionalization of Participation and Transparency in Local Budget: Experience of Local Regulation Advocacy on Local Planning and Budgeting in Sumedang District, West Java Province’. In Show Me the Money: Budget Advocacy in Indonesia, edited by Wahyu W. Basjir and Debbie Budlender, 89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Yogyakarta: IDEA/Inisiatif/Lakpesdam NU/PATTIRO/Seknas FITRA/International Budget Partnership. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2333816
   Google Scholar
• Ormerod, John T. and Matt P. Wand. 2018. ‘LowRankQP: Low Rank Quadratic Programming’. Last modified: 7 February 2018. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=LowRankQP
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, Carole. 2012. ‘Participatory Democracy Revisited’. Perspectives on Politics 10 (1): 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592711004877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patunru, Arianto A. 2015. ‘Access to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation in Indonesia’. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 2 (2): 234–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, Vijayendra and Ana María Ibáñez. 2005. ‘The Social Impact of Social Funds in Jamaica: A “Participatory Econometric” Analysis of Targeting, Collective Action, and Participation in Community-Driven Development’. Journal of Development Studies 41 (5): 788–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380500145297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, Michael. 2006. ‘Is Democracy Good for the Poor?’ American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 860–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00220.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seknas FITRA. 2011. ‘Analisis Anggaran Daerah: Studi terhadap Anggaran Tahun 2007–2010 di 42 Kabupaten/Kota dan 5 Provinsi di Indonesia’ [Local Budget Analysis: A Study of Local Budgets in 42 Districts/Municipalities and 5 Provinces in Indonesia]. Jakarta: Seknas FITRA. http://seknasfitra.org/publication/kinerja-pengelolaan-anggaran-daerah-2010/
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Anwar, ed. 2007. Local Budgeting. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6669
   Google Scholar
• Sheely, Ryan. 2015. ‘Mobilization, Participatory Planning Institutions, and Elite Capture: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural Kenya’. World Development 67: 251–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, Christopher and Tubagus Furqon Sofhani. 2008. ‘University–Community Partnership: Institutionalizing Empowered and Participatory Planning in Indonesia’. In Planning and Decentralization: Contested Spaces for Public Action in the Global South, edited by Victoria A. Beard, Faranak Miraftab and Christopher Silver, 158–74. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203928264
   Google Scholar
• Skoufias, Emmanuel, Ambar Narayan, Basab Dasgupta and Kai Kaiser. 2014. ‘Electoral Accountability and Local Government Spending in Indonesia’. Policy Research Working Paper No. 6782. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6782
   Google Scholar
• Speer, Johanna. 2012. ‘Participatory Governance Reform: A Good Strategy for Increasing Government Responsiveness and Improving Public Services?’ World Development 40 (12): 2379–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumarto, Hetifah Sj. 2008. ‘Promoting Citizen Participation in Local Governance in Indonesia: Practices, Policies, and Agenda’. Jakarta: Local Government Support Program. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan049827.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Touchton, Michael and Brian Wampler. 2014. ‘Improving Social Well-being through New Democratic Institutions’. Comparative Political Studies 47 (10): 1442–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usui, Nario and Armida S. Alisjahbana. 2005. ‘Local Development Planning and Budgeting in De-centralised Indonesia: Missing Links in the Bottom-Up Approach’. Kansai University Review of Economics 7: 71–97. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110004708314
   Google Scholar
• Valsecchi, Michele. 2013. ‘Local Elections and Corruption during Democratization: Evidence from Indonesia’. Working paper. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg. http://www.economics.handels.gu.se/digitalAssets/1457/1457696_130130_mv_corruption.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wampler, Brian. 2007. Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wampler, Brian and Michael Touchton. 2017. ‘Participatory Budgeting: Adoption and Transformation’. Making All Voices Count Research Briefing. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/13366
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2008. Brazil: Toward a More Inclusive and Effective Participatory Budget in Porto Alegre. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8042
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2019. Indonesia Database for Policy and Economic Research (INDO-DAPOER). Last modified: 7 May 2019. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=1266
   Google Scholar