Complexity, anachronism and time-parochialism: historicising strategy while strategising history

References

• Abrahamson, E., and G. Fairchild. “Management Fashion: Lifecycles, Triggers, and Collective Learning Processes.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44, no. 4 (1999): 708–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, G. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little Brown, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Amitabh, M., and R. K. Gupta. “Research in Strategy-structure-performance Construct: Review of Trends, Paradigms and Methodologies.” Journal of Management & Organization 16, no. 5 (2010): 744–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansoff, H. Implanting Strategic Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Ashplant, T. G., and A. Wilson. “Present-Centred History and the Problem of Historical Knowledge.” The Historical Journal 31, no. 2 (1988): 253–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augier, M., J. March, and B. Sullivan. “Notes on the Evolution of a Research Community: Organization Studies in Anglophone North America, 1945–2000.” Organization Science 16, no. 1 (2005): 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• BBC-Horizon. “Ice Mummies Part 2. A Life in Ice, 1997.” Available at: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=IP9NVLO3 accessed 6 October 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Berthod, O. “Using Historical Methods in Processual Research on Organizations: Empirical Issues at Stake.” Paper presented at the 27th EGOS Colloquium: Gothenburg (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Besta, F., ed. Bilanci Generali della Repubblica di Venezia, Vol. I Venice: Regia Commissione per la pubblicazione dei documenti finanziari della repubblica di Venezia, 1912.
   Google Scholar
• Besta, F., ed. Bilanci Generali della Repubblica di Venezia, Volume III, Bilanci dal 1736 al 1755. Venice: Prem. Stb. Tipo-Lit. Visentini cav. Federico, 1903.
   Google Scholar
• Biondi, Y., and S. Zambon, eds. Accounting and Business Economics. New York: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bisoux, T. A Return to Reality, 16–22. Bized: May/June, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, C., and M. Rowlinson. “M. “Management and Organizational History: Prospects”.” Management & Organizational History 1, no. 1 (2006): 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Boschken, H. L. “Strategy and Structure: Reconceiving the Relationship.” Journal of Management March 16, no. 1 (1990): 135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Bottom, W. “Before the Ford Foundation: Development of the Research-based Model of Business Education.” Best Papers 30th Annual Proceedings of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. D., and E. R. Thompson. “A Narrative Approach to Strategy-as-practice.” Business History 55, no. 7 (2013): 1143–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullard, M. M., S. R. Epstein, B. G. Kohl, and S. M. Stuard. “Where History and Theory Interact: Frederic C. Lane on the Emergence of Capitalism.” Speculum 79, no. 1 (2004): 88–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, S., and I. Gutierrez. “Vogues in Management Accounting Research.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 19, no. 2 (2003): 213–231.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie, G. D., and C. J. Napier. “Exploring Comparative International Accounting History.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15, no. 5 (1999): 689–718.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, C. “The Age of Strategy: Strategy, Organizations and Society.” Business History 55, no. 7 (2013): 1047–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswill, C., and R. Wensley. “Doors and Boundaries: A Recent History of the Relationship Between Research and Practice in UK Organisational and Management Research.” Business History 49, no. 3 (2007): 293–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. D. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P., and M. Rowlinson. “The Treatment of History in Organization Studies: Toward an ‘Historic Turn’?” Business History 46, no. 3 (2004): 331–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R., W. P. Jarvis, and T. S. Pitsis. “Making Strategy Matter: Social Theory, Knowledge Interests and Business Education.” Business History 55, no. 7 (2013): 1247–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., J. March, and J. Olsen “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17, no. 1 (1972): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concina, E. L’Arsenal della Repubblica di Venezia. Milano: Electa, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C.E., ed. “The Strategic Use of the Past and Future in Organizational Change.” Journal of Organizational Change Management, Special Issue, 15, no. 16 (2002): 556–562.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., and E. Friedberg. L’Acteur et le Systeme. Les Constraintes de l’Action Collective. Paris: Edition du Seuil, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R. Shipbuilders of the Venetian Arsenal: Workers and Workplace in the Pre-industrial City. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• de Roover, R. “New Perspectives on the History of Accounting.” The Accounting Review 20, no. 3 (1955): 405–420.
   Google Scholar
• de Roover, R. Business, Banking and Economic Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, K. G. “A Critical Survey of Recent Research in Chinese Economic History.” The Economic History Review 53, no. 1 (2000): 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durepos, G., A. J. Mills, and T. G. Weatherbee. “Theorizing the Past: Realism, Relativism, Relationalism and the Reassembly of Weber.” Management & Organizational History 7, no. 3 (2012): 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Engwall, L. “Research Note: Asterix in Disneyland. Management Scholars from France on the World Stage.” Organization Studies 19, no. 5 (1998): 863–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engwall, L., and V. Zamagni (eds.). Management Education in Historical Perspective. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Forsellini, M. “L’Organizzazione Economica Dell’Arsenal di Venezia nella Prima Meta del Seicento.” Archivio Veneto 5, no. 7 (1930): 54–117.
   Google Scholar
• Garlichs, M. The Concept of Strategic Fit. Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. “La struttura del campo decisionale: modelli, contenuti e relazioni.” Studi Organizzativi no. 2 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia, PA: The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. “The Field of Management’s Devotion to Theory: Too Much of a Good Thing?” Academy of Management Journal 50, no. 6 (2007): 1346–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. The Counter-revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskin, K., and R. Macve. “The Genesis of Accountability: The West Point Connections.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 13, no. 1 (1988): 37–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, G.P., and A.H. Van de Ven, eds. “Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change.” Organization Science, special issue, 1, no. 3 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G., and T. Khanna. “Bringing History (Back) into International Business.” Journal of International Business Studies 37, no. 4 (2006): 453–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G., and J. Zeitlin. “Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Business History, edited by G Jones and J Zeitlin, 1–6. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kieser, A. “Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses – And How This Should Be Performed.” Organization Science 5, no. 4 (1994): 608–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipping, M., and B. Üsdiken. “Business History and Management Studies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Business History, edited by G Jones and J Zeitlin, 96–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, S. “Memory, Anachronism, and Articulation.” Trames 12, no. 3 (2008): 264–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroeze, R., and S. Keulen. “The Relevance of History for Organizations. Accepting the Advantages and Responsibility of Being a Management Historian.” Paper presented at the 27th EGOS Colloquium Gothenburg 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, F. Venetian Ships and Shipbuilders of the Renaissance. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins press, 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Leblebici, H., and N. Shah. “The Birth, Transformation and Regeneration of Business Incubators as New Organisational Forms: Understanding the Interplay between Organisational History and Organisational Theory.” Business History 46, no. 3 (2004): 353–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loasby, B. J. Choice, Complexity and Ignorance. Cambridge: University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Lusiani, M., and L. Zan. “Change and Continuity in Managerialism: 100 Years of Administrative History at the International Museum of Ceramics in Faenza.” Management and Organization History 6, no. 1 (2011): 59–80.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. “Epilogue.” In A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. 2nd ed, edited by RM Cyert and JG March. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. Decisions and Organisations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. “Garbage Can Models of Decision Making in Organizations.” In Ambiguity and Command: Organizational Perspective on Military Decision Making, edited by JG March and R Weissinger-Baylon. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1986: 11–36.
   Google Scholar
• Masi, V. La Ragioneria è morta! Viva la Ragioneria!. Marzo Aprile: Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. The Rhetoric of Economics. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action.” American Sociological Review 1, no. 6 (1936): 894–904.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E., and C. C. Snow. “Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame.” California Management Review 26, no. 3 (1984): 10–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E., C. C. Snow, A. D. Meyer, and H. J. Coleman. “Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process.” The Academy of Management Review 3, no. 3 (1978): 546–562.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, P., and C. Napier. “Genealogies of Calculation.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 18, no. 7 and 8 (1993): 631–647
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. “Configurations of Strategy and Structure: Towards a Synthesis.” Strategic Management Journal 7, no. 3 (1986): 233–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. “Patterns in Strategy Formation.” Management Science 9, no. 3 (1978): 934–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. “The Design School: Reconsidering the Basic Premises of Strategic Management. Strategic.” Management Journal 11, no. 3 (1990): 171–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York, NY: The Free Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., and J. S. Waters. “Of Strategy, Deliberate and Emergent.” Strategic Management Journal 6, no. 3 (1985): 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., and J.A. Waters. “Does Decision Get in the Way?” Organization Studies 11, no. 1 (1990): l–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, F., A. Whittle, A. Gilchrist, and P. Lenney. “Politics and Strategy Practice: An Ethnomethodologically-informed Discourse Analysis Perspective.” Business History 5, no. 7 (2013): 1168–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan, K. “The Great Divide.” The Times Literary Supplement, Title Page June 26 (1998): 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, T. “From Freemasons to the Employee: Organization, History and Subjectivity.” Organization Studies 25, no. 8 (2004): 1363–1387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann, R. Management for Growth. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, M., and M. B. W. Graham. “Moving Forward by Looking Backward: Business History and Management Studies. Guest Editors’ Introduction.” Journal of Management Studies 47, no. 5 (2010): 775–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, M., M.B.W. Graham, and C. McKenna, eds., “Business History.” Journal of Management studies, special issue, no. 5 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. The Politics of Organizational Decision-making. London: Tavistock Publications, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. (ed.). The Management of Strategic Change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. “Studying Strategic Choice and Strategic Change.” Organization Studies 11, no. 1 (1990): 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. “Renaissance and Renewal in Management Studies: Relevance Regained.” European Management Review 6, no. 3 (2009): 141–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. “Prediction and Prophecy in the Social Sciences.” In Theories of History, edited by PK Gardiner, 276–285. New York, NY: The Free Press, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Rehn, A. and L. Strannegard, eds. “Processual Approaches in Management and Organization Studies.” Scandinavian Journal of Management special issue 23, no. 3 (2007): 229–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ropo, A., P. Eriksson and J. Hunt, eds. “Reflections on Conducting Processual Research on Management and Organizations, Special Issue.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 13, no. 4 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Rowlinson, M., and J. Hassard. “Historical Methods in Management and Organization Studies.” Paper presented at the 27th EGOS Conference: Goteborg 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ruef, M., and A. Harness. “Agrarian Origins of Management Ideology: The Roman and Antebellum Cases.” Organization Studies 30, no. 6 (2009): 589–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelt, R. P. “Toward a Strategic Theory of the Firm.” In Competitive Strategic Management, edited by RB Lamb, 556–570. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. “Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2, no. 1 (1991): 125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. “Rational Decision-making in Business Organizations.” The American Economic Review 69, no. 4 (1979): 493–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. Administrative Behavior. New York, NY: McMillan, 1947.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. E. “Management History and Historical Context: Potential Benefits of its Inclusion in the Management Curriculum.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 6, no. 4 (2007): 522–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, P., J. Wilson, and O. Leeds. “Constructing ‘The History of Strategic Management’: A Critical Analysis of the Academic Discourse.” Business History 55, no. 7 (2013): 1119–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. “The Case for Management History.” Accounting, Business & Financial History 11, no. 2 (2001): 99–115.
   Google Scholar
• Tienari, J., and J. Laurilla. “Editorial Special topic Forum on Management Education: Research and Practice.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 23, no. 1 (2007): 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toninelli, P.A. “The Atlantic Divide: Methodological and Epistemological Differences in Economic History.” Working paper (2007) Available at: http://dipeco.economia.unimib.it/repec/pdf/mibwpaper112.pdf (accessed 22 February 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Üsdiken, B., A. Kieser, and P. Kjaer. “Academy, Economy and Polity: Betriebswirtschaftslehre in Germany, Denmark and Turkey Before 1945.” Business History 46, no. 3 (2004): 381–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Fleet, D. D. “Doing Management History: One Editor’s Views.” Journal of Management History no. 14, 3 (2008): 237–247.
   Google Scholar
• van Fleet, D. D. Wren Daniel A., “Teaching History in Business Schools: 1982–2003.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 4, no. 1 (2005): 44–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N., and J. C. Camillus. “Exploring the Concept of Fit in Strategic Management.” Academy of Management Review 9, no. 3 (1984): 513–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Krogh, G., C. Rossi-Lamastra, and S. Haefliger. “Phenomenon-based Research in Management and Organisation Science: When is it Rigorous and Does it Matter?” Long Range Planning 45, no. 4 (2012): 277–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vries, P. “The California School and Beyond: How to Study the Great Divergence?” History Compass 8, no. 7 (2010): 730–751.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, B. G., and J. O’Toole. “How Business Schools Lost Their Way.” Harvard Business Review (2005): 96–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. “Enactment Processes in Organizations.” In New Directions in Organizational Behaviour, edited by BM Staw and GB Salancik. Chicago, IL: St. Clair Frets, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Wensley, R. “Getting Too Close to the Fire: The Challenge of Engaging Stories and Saving Lives.” British Journal of Management 22, no. 3 (2011): 370–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. “The Fragmented State of Management Studies: Reasons and Consequences.” Journal of Management Studies 21, no. 3 (1984): 331–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wren, D. A. The History of Management Thought. 5th ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zambon, S. “Accounting and Business Economics Traditions: A Missing European Connection?” European Accounting Review 5, no. 3 (1995): 401–412.
   Google Scholar
• Zambon, S., and L. Zan. “Controlling Expenditure, or the Slow Emergence of Costing at the Venice Arsenal (1586–1633).” Accounting, Business & Financial History 17, no. 1 (2007): 105–128.
   Google Scholar
• Zan, L. “What’s Left for Formal Planning.” Economia Aziendale 6, no. 2 (1987): 187–204.
   Google Scholar
• Zan, L. “Looking for Theories in Strategy Studies.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 6, no. 2 (1990): 89–108.
   Google Scholar
• Zan, L. “Toward a History of Accounting Histories.” European Accounting Review 3, no. 2 (1994): 255–307.
   Google Scholar
• Zan, L. “Interactionism and Systemic View in the Strategic Approach.” In Advances in Strategic Managemen. vol. 11, edited by P Shrivastava and C Stubbart, 261–283. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Zan, L. “Writing Management and Accounting History. Insights From Unorthodox Music Historiography.” Accounting Historians Journal 31, no. 2 (2004a): 171–192.
   Google Scholar
• Zan, L. “Accounting and Management Discourse in Protoindustrial Settings: The Venice Arsenal in the Turn of the XVI Century.” Accounting and Business Research 32, no. 2 (2004b): 145–75.
   Google Scholar
• Zan, L. “Future Directions From the Past: Management and Accounting Discourse in Historical Perspective.” In Advances in Strategic Management. Expanding Perspectives on the Strategy Process, Vol. 22, edited by G. Szulanski, J. Porac and Y. Doz, 457–489. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zan, L. Managerial Rhetoric and Arts Organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Zan, L., and K. Deng. “Searching for Managerial Micro Foundations in West/East Divergence.” In Paper presented at the Third European Congress on World and Global History. (London, April 14–17, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Zan, L., and Q. Xue. “Budgeting China: Macro Policies and Micro Practices in Public Sector Changes.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 24, no. 1 (2011): 38–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar