Clio in the business school: Historical approaches in strategy, international business and entrepreneurship

References

• Abrams, Philip. Historical Sociology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Aldcroft, Derek H. “The Entrepreneur and the British Economy, 1870–1914.” The Economic History Review 17, no. 1 (1964): 113–134.10.2307/2592694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldcroft, Derek H. “Technical Progress and British Enterprise 1875–1914.” Business History 8, no. 2 (1966): 122–139.10.1080/00076796600000020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, Howard E. “The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: a personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship.” Research Policy 41 (2012): 1240–1248.10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Thomas, and Flannery Burke. “What Does It Mean to Think Historically?” Perspectives in History (2007): http://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/january-2007/what-does-it-mean-to-think-historically
   Google Scholar
• Austin, Gareth. History, Archives and Development Policy in Africa. Using History to Inform Development Policy: The Role of Archives. Washington DC: World Bank, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Berridge, Virginia, and John Stewart. “History: a social science neglected by other social sciences (and why it should not be).” Contemporary Social Science 7, no. 1 (2012): 39–54. doi:10.1080/215820412011652362.
   Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, Julian. “Publishing Qualitative Research in International Business.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business edited by R.Marschan-Piekkari, and C.Welch. 570–584. Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, Matthew, and Michael Green. Philanthrocapitalism: How Giving Can Save The World. London: Bloomsbury Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Charles. “Does history matter in strategy? The possibilities and problems of counterfactual analysis.” Management Decision 41, no. 1 (2003): 96–104. doi:10.1108/00251740310445545.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Charles and Michael Rowlinson. “Management and Organizational History: Prospects”. Management and Organizational History 1, no. 1(2006): 5–30. doi: 10.1177/1744935906060627.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Callum G. Postmodernism for Historians. London: Pearson, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bucheli, Marcelo. “Multinational corporations, totalitarian regimes and economic nationalism: United Fruit Company in Central America, 1899–1975.” Business History 50, no. 4 (2008): 433–454. doi:10.1080/00076790802106315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, Peter J. “Business history and international business.”Business History 51, no. 3 (2009): 307–333. doi: 10.1080/00076790902871560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgelman, Robert A. “Bridging history and reductionism: A key role for longitudinal qualitative research.” Journal of International Business Studies 42, no. 5 (2011): 591–601. doi:10.1057/jibs.2011.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, George, David J. Mackay, and Andrew Perchard. “Managerial hyperopia: A potential unintended consequence of foresight in a top management team?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 101 (2015): 134–146.10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, Chris, Stewart R Clegg, and Martin Kornberger. (2008). “So!apbox: editorial essays: Strategy as practice?” Strategic Organization 6, no. 1 (2008): 83–99. doi: 10.1177/1476127007087154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassis, Youssef. Big Business: The European Experience in the Twentieth Century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1999.10.1093/0198296061.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, Alfred Dupont. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, Harvey, Mairi Maclean, Jillian Gordon, and Eleanor Shaw. “Andrew Carnegie and the foundations of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy.” Business History 53, no. 3 (2011): 425–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, Robert, and Robin Holt. Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.10.1017/CBO9780511642234
   Google Scholar
• Chia, Robert, and Brad MacKay. “Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice.” Human Relations 60, no. 1 (2007): 217–242. doi:10.1177/0018726707075291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chikudate, Nobuyuki. “Collective hyperopia and dualistic natures of corporate social responsibility in Japanese companies.” Asian Business & Management 8, no. 2 (2009): 169–184. doi:10.1057/abm20094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Peter, and Michael Rowlinson. “The Treatment of History in Organisation Studies: Towards an ‘Historic Turn’?” Business History 46, no. 3 (2004): 331–352. doi:10.1080/0007679042000219175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, Stewart, Chris Carter, Martin Kornberger, and Jochen Schweitzer. Strategy: Theory and Practice. London: Sage, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Coraiola, Diego M., William M. Foster, and Roy Suddaby. “Varieties of History in Organizational Studies.” In Routledge Companion to Management and Organizational History, edited by Patricia Genoe MacLaren Terrence Weatherbee and Albert J Mills, 1–28. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Danneels, Erwin. “Trying to become a different type of company: Dynamic Capability at Smith Corona.” Strategic Management Journal 32 (2010): 1–31. doi:10.1002/smj.863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, Stephanie. “The silence of the archives: business history, post-colonialism and archival ethnography.” Management & Organizational History 8, no. 2 (2013): 155–173. doi:10.1080/17449359.2012.761491.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, Stephanie. “Mothership Reconnection: Microhistory and Institutional Work Compared.” In Routledge Companion to Management and Organizational History, edited by MacLaren et al., 222–237. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, Stephanie, Matthias Kipping, and R Daniel Wadhwani. “New Business Histories! Plurality in Business History Research Methods”. Business History 57, no. 1 (2015): 30–40. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2014.977870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, Laura Lee. Writing Gender History. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Duara, Prasenjit. “Why is History anti-theoretical?” Modern China 24, no. 2 (1998): 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Dennis. Class Struggles. London: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” The Academy of Management Review 14, no. 4 (1989): 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericson, Mona, and Leif Melin. “Strategizing and history.” In Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice, edited by D Golsorkhi, L Rouleau, D Seidl and E Vaara, 326–343. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fear, Jeffrey R. Organizing Control: August Thyssen and the Construction of German Corporate Management. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.10.4159/9780674036741
   Google Scholar
• Fear, Jeffrey R. “Mining the Past: Historicizing Organizational Learning and Change.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods edited by M.Bucheli and R.D.Wadhwani, 169–191. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fellman, Susanna, and Andrew Popp. “Lost in the archive: the business historian in distress.” In Coping with excess. How organizations, communities and individuals manage overflows edited by B.Czarniawska and O.Löfgren, 216–243. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, Daniel P., and David A. Kirsch. “The study of emerging industries: Recognizing and responding to some central problems.” Journal of Business Venturing 26, no. 5(2011): 589–602. doi: 10.1177/0266242613519807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, William M., Diego M. Coraiola, Roy Suddaby, Jochem Kroezen, and David Chandler. “The strategic use of historical narratives: a theoretical framework.” Business History (2016): 1–25.10.1080/00076791.2016.1224234
   Google Scholar
• Fruin, W. “Mark. “Bringing the world (back) into international business”.” Journal of International Business Studies 38, no. 2 (2007): 353–356. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddis, John Lewis. The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Gourvish, Terry R. “British Business and the Transition to a Corporate Economy: Entrepreneurship and Management Structures”. In Enterprise, Management and Innovation in British Business 1914 – 1980 edited by R.P.T. Davenport-Hines and Geoffrey Jones, 18–45. London: Frank Cass, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Anna, and Kathleen Troup. The Houses of History: A Critical Reader in Twentieth-Century History. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, Anna, and Andrea Bernardi. “Understanding the rift, the (still) uneasy bedfellows of History and Organization Studies.” Organization (2013): 1–26. doi:10.1177/1350508413514286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, Andrew B., and Yellowlees Douglas. “When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of Electric Light.” Administrative Science Quarterly 46, no. 3 (2001): 476–501.10.2307/3094872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, Charles E. “Business History and the Problem of Entrepreneurship: The Case of the Rio Tinto Company, 1873 – 1939.” Business History 21, no. 1 (1979): 3–22. doi:10.1080/00076797900000001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, Paula, and Andreas P. Spee. “Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field.” International Journal of Management 11, no. 1 (2009): 69–95. doi:10.1111/j1468-2370200800250x.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Geoffrey, and Tarun Khanna. “Bringing history (back) into international business.” Journal of International Business Studies 37, no. 4 (2006): 453–468. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Geoffrey, Marco HD van Leeuwen, and Stephen Broadberry. “The future of economic, business, and social history.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 60, no.3 (2012): 225–253. doi: 10.1080/03585522.2012.727766.
   Google Scholar
• Jordanova, Ludmilla. History in Practice. London: Routledge, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kieser, Alfred. “Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses-And How This Should Be Performed.” Organization Science 5, no. 4 (1994): 608–620. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.4.608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipping, Matthias. “Business-government relations: beyond performance issues.” In Business history around the world, 372–393.
   Google Scholar
• Kipping, Matthias, and Behlül Üsdiken. “History in Organization and Management Theory: More Than Meets the Eye”. The Academy of Management Annals 8, no. 1 (2014): 535–588.
   Google Scholar
• Kipping, Matthias, and Ludovic Cailluet. “Mintzberg’s Emergent and Deliberate Strategies: Tracking Alcan’s Activities in Europe, 1928–2007.” Business History Review 84, no. 1 (2010): 79–104. doi:10.1017/S0007680500001252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberger, Martin. “Disciplining the future: On studying the politics of strategy.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 29 (2013): 104–107. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2012.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberger, Martin. “Clausewitz: On strategy.” Business History 55 (2013): 1058–1073. doi:10.1080/00076791.2013.838035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, David A., and James G. March. “The myopia of learning.” Strategic Management Journal 14, S.2 (1993): 95–112. doi:10.1002/smj.4250141009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipartito, Kenneth. “Historical Sources and Data.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, edited by M Bucheli and RD Wadhwani, 284–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lummis, Trevor. “Structure and validity in oral evidence.” International Journal of Oral History 2, no. 2 (1983): 109–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean, Mairi, Charles Harvey, Stewart Clegg. “Conceptualizing Historical Organization Studies.” Academy of Management Review (2015) [ advance access].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean, Mairi, Charles Harvey, Jillian Gordon, and Eleanor Shaw. “Identity, storytelling and the philanthropic journey”. Human Relations. October 2015 vol. 68 no. 10 (2015): 1623–1652. doi:10.1177/0018726714564199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairi, Maclean, Charles Harvey, and Jillian Gordon. “Social Innovation, Social Entrepreneurship and the Practice of Contemporary Entrepreneurial Philanthropy.” International Small Business Journal 31, no. 7 (2012): 747–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschan-Piekkari, Rebecca, and Catherine Welch (eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, Noel. The Empire Trap: The Rise and Fall of U.S. Intervention to Protect American Property Overseas, 1893–1976. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.10.1515/9781400846603
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, Donald N., and Lars G. Sandberg. “From damnation to redemption: judgments on the late Victorian entrepreneur.” Explorations in Economic History 9 (1972): 89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, Albert J., and Jean Helms Mills. “Digging Archaeology: Postpositivist Theory and Archival Research in Case Study Development.” In Rethinking the Case Study in International Business and Management Research edited by R.Piekkari, and C.Welch. 342–360. London: Edward Elgar, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, Henry, and James A. Waters. “Of Strategies: Deliberate and Emergent.” Strategic Management Journal 6, no. 3 (1985): 257–272. doi:10.1002/smj.4250060306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morck, Randall, and Bernard Yeung. “History in perspective: comment on Jones and Khanna. `Bringing history (back) into international business’.” Journal of International Business Studies 38, no. 2 (2007): 357–360. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morck, Randall, and Bernard Yeung. “Economics, History, and Causation.” Business History Review 85, no. 1 (2011): 39–63. doi:10.1017/S000768051100002X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murillo, Bianca. “‘The Devil We Know: Gold Coast Consumers, Local Employees, and the United Africa Company, 1940–1960.” Enterprise & Society 12, no. 2 (2011): 317–355. doi:10.1093/es/khq106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, Mary, and Margaret B. W. Graham. “Guest Editors’ introduction: Moving Forward by Looking Backward: Business History and Management Studies. Journal of Management Studies 47, no. 5 (2010): 775–790. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00923.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Mike W., Sunny Li Sun, Brian Pinkham, and Hao Chen. “The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod.” Academy of Management Perspectives (2009): 63–81. doi:10.1121/68460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piekkari, Rebekka, and Welch, Chaterine. (Eds.) Rethinking the Case Study in International Business and Management Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, Della (ed). Remembering: Oral History Performance, Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2005.10.1057/9781403979582
   Google Scholar
• Popp, Andrew. Entrepreneurial Families: Business, Marriage and Life in the Early Nineteenth Century. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Popp, Andrew, and Robin, Holt. “Entrepreneurship and the organization of being: the case of the Shaws.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 25, nos. 1–2 (2013): 52–68. doi:10.1080/08985626.2012.746887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, Andrew. “The Broken Cotton Speculator.” History Workshop Journal 78, no. 1 (2014): 133–156. doi:10.1093/hwj/dbt035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, Andrew, and Robin Holt. “The presence of entrepreneurial opportunity.” Business History 55, no. 1 (2013): 9–28. doi:10.1080/00076791.2012.687539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, Richard. “Business History and Management Theory: An Introduction.” Industrial and Corporate Change. 6, no. 2 (1997): 339–340.10.1093/icc/6.2.339
   Google Scholar
• Rowlinson, Michael, and John S Hassard. “Historical neo-institutionalism or neo-institutionalist history? Historical research in management and organization studies.” Management & Organizational History 8, Issue 2 (2013): 111–126. doi:10.1080/17449359.2013.780518.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlinson, Michael, John Hassard, and Stephanie Decker. “Research Strategies for Organizational History: A Dialogue between Historical Theory and Organization Theory.” Academy of Management Review 39, no. 3(2014): 250–274. doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelt, Richard P., Dan Schendel, and David J. Teece. Fundamental issues in strategy: A research agenda. Boston MA: Harvard Business Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, Eleanor, Jillian Gordon, Charles Harvey, and Mairi Maclean. 2013. “Exploring contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy.” International Small Business Journal 31, no. 5 (2013): 580–599. doi:10.1177/0266242611429164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman-Jones, Gareth. “From Historical Sociology to Theoretic History.” British Journal of Sociology 27, no. 3 (1976): 295–305.10.2307/589617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield, Penny. “Dis/composing the subject: Intersubjectivities in oral history.” In Feminism and Autobiography: Texts, edited by T Cosslet, C Lury and P Summerfield, 93–108. London: Theories and Methods, Routledge, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, David J. “Alfred Chandler and “capabilities” theories of strategy and management.” Industrial and Corporate Change 19, no. 2 (2010): 297–316. Management Journal 18, No.7 (1997): 509–533. doi:10.1139/0.9899.10.1093/icc/dtq008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Alistair. Anzac Memories: Living with the Legend. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, Jim. The Politics of Decline: Understanding Postwar Britain. London: Longman Pub Group, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Tripsas, Mary. “Unravelling the process of creative destruction: complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry.” Strategic Management Journal 18 (1997): 119–142.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<119::AID-SMJ921>3.3.CO;2-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üsdiken, Behlül, and Albert Kieser. “Introduction: History in Organisation Studies.” Business History 46, no. 3 (2004): 321–330. doi:10.1080/0007679042000219166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaara, Eero and Juha-Antti Lamberg. “Taking Historical Embeddedness Seriously: Three Historical Approaches to Advance Strategy Process and Practice Research.” Academy of Management Review (2015) [ Advance access].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadhwani, R. Daniel, and Marcelo Bucheli. “The Future of the Past in Management and Organization Studies.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods edited by Marcelo Bucheli and R. Daniel Wadhwani, 3–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wadhwani, R. Daniel., and Geoffrey Jones. “Schumpeter’s Plea: Historical Reasoning in Entrepreneurship Theory and Research.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods edited by Marcelo Bucheli, and R. Daniel Wadhwani. 192–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wadhwani, R. Daniel. “Entrepreneurship in Historical Context: Using History to Develop Theory and Understand Process” . In Routledge Companion to Management and Organizational History. Edited by MacLaren et al. London, Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, Catherine, Rebecca Piekkari, Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, and Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki. “Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research.” Journal of International Business Studies 42, no. 5 (2011): 740–762. doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Nicholas J. British business in post-colonial Malaysia, 1957–70: Neo-colonialism or disengagement?. London: Routledge Curzon, 2004.10.4324/9780203333020
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, Michael, Simon Szreter, and Vijayendra Rao. “How and why history matters for development policy.” In History, historians and development policy: A necessary dialogue, edited by Christopher A Bayly, Vijayendra Rao, Simon Szreter and Michael Woodcock, 3–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Yacob, Shakila, and Nicholas J. White. “The ‘Unfinished Business’ of Malaysia’s Decolonisation: The Origins of the Guthrie ‘Dawn Raid’.” Modern Asian Studies 44, no. 5 (2010): 919–960. doi:10.1017/S0026749X09990308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, Jo Ann. “Understanding Historical Methods in Organization Studies.” In Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, edited by M Bucheli and R Daniel Wadhwani, 265–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2003. London: Sage, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, Jonathan. “Productive Alternatives: Flexibility, Governance, and Strategic Choice in Industrial History.” In Business History around the World, edited by Franco Amatori and Geoffrey Jones, 62–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.10.1017/CBO9780511512100
   Google Scholar