Prediction of morphology development from nucleation and plating overpotentials in nickel electrodeposition

References

• Winand R. Electrodeposition of metals and alloys – new results and perspectives. Electrochim Acta. 1994;39:1091–1105. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(94)E0023-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budevski E, Staikov G, Lorenz WJ. Electrocrystallization nucleation and growth phenomena. Electrochim Acta. 2000;45:2559–2574. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00353-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm M, O’Keefe TJ. Evaluation of nickel deposition by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J Appl Electrochem. 2000;30:1125–1132. doi: 10.1023/A:1004002303181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crundwell F, Moats M, Ramachandran V, et al. Extractive metallurgy of nickel, cobalt and platinum-group metals. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2011; Chapter 26, Electrowinning of nickel from purified nickel solutions; p. 327–346.
   Google Scholar
• Di Bari GA. Modern electroplating. 5th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2010; Chapter 3, Electrodeposition of nickel; p. 79–114.
   Google Scholar
• Abyaneh MY, Hashemi-Pour M. The effect of the concentration of boric acid on the kinetics of electrocrystallization of nickel. Trans Inst Met Finish. 1994;72:23–26. doi: 10.1080/00202967.1994.11871017
   Google Scholar
• Ji J, Cooper WC. Surface pH measurements during nickel electrodeposition. J Appl Electrochem. 1995;28:907–913.
   Google Scholar
• Wu R, Oliazadeh M, Alfantazi AM. Electrical conductivity and density of NiSO4/H2SO4 solutions in the range of modern nickel electrorefining and electrowinning electrolytes. J Appl Electrochem. 2003;33:1043–1047. doi: 10.1023/A:1026261526134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantelme F, Seghiouer A, Derja A. Model of nickel electrodeposition from acidic medium. J Appl Electrochem. 1998;28:907–913. doi: 10.1023/A:1003404118601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupi CM, Pasquali M, Dell’Era A. Studies concerning nickel electrowinning from acidic and alkaline electrolytes. Miner Eng. 2006;19:1246–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amblard J, Froment M, Maurin G, et al. Nickel electrocrystallization – from nucleation to textures. Electrochim Acta. 1983;28:909–915. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(83)85166-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armyanov S, Sotirova-Chakarove G. Hydrogen desorption and internal stress in nickel coatings obtained by periodic electrodeposition. J Electrochem Soc. 1992;139:3454–3457. doi: 10.1149/1.2069098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadad S, Harris TM. Oxygen incorporation during the electrodeposition of Ni, Fe and Ni-Fe alloys. J Electrochem Soc. 1998;145:3699–3703. doi: 10.1149/1.1838861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathy BC, Das SC, Singh P, et al. Effect of Mg2+, Li+, Na+ and K+ in the electrocrystallization of nickel from sulfate solutions containing boric acid. J Appl Electrochem. 2001;31:573–577. doi: 10.1023/A:1017585726321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerby R, Jackson H, O’Keefe T, et al. Evaluation of organic additives for use in zinc electrowinning. Metall Trans B. 1977;8:661–668. doi: 10.1007/BF02669345
   Google Scholar
• Mackinnon DJ, Brannen JM. Zinc deposit structures obtained from high purity synthetic and industrial acid sulfate electrolytes with and without antimony and glue additions. J Appl Electrochem. 1977;7:451–459. doi: 10.1007/BF00615950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren IH. The application of polarization measurements in the control of zinc tankhouse operation. Proceedings of Zinc’85; Osaka, Japan: Mining and Metallurgical Institute of Japan; 1985. p. 251–264.
   Google Scholar
• Winand R. Electrocrystallization: theory and application. Hydrometallurgy. 1992;29:567–598. doi: 10.1016/0304-386X(92)90033-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen T, Kerby R, O’Keefe T. Control techniques for industrial electrodeposition from aqueous solutions. J Met. 1985;37(1):36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Adcock PA, Quillinan A, Clark B, et al. Measurement of polarization parameters impacting on electrodeposit morphology II: conventional zinc electrowinning solutions. J Appl Electrochem. 2004;34:771–780. doi: 10.1023/B:JACH.0000035604.53451.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adcock PA, Quillinan A, Clark B, et al. Measurement of polarization parameters impacting on electrodeposit morphology I: theory and development of technique. J Appl Electrochem. 2002;32:1101–1107. doi: 10.1023/A:1021251603240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiyangwa E. The evaluation of polarization parameters as quality predictors for zinc electroplated from acidic sulphate solutions [Master of applied sciences, metallurgy]. South Africa: University of Pretoria; July 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chiyangwa E, Sandenbergh RF, Schoeman L. Development and evaluation of polarization parameters as quality predictors for zinc electroplated from acidic sulphate electrolytes. Proceedings of Met Soc Hydrometallurgy Conference; Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: Hydrometallurgy; 2014, II. p. 141–152.
   Google Scholar
• Moats MS, Derrick A. Investigation of nucleation and plating overpotentials during copper electrowinning using the galvanostatic staircase method. Electrometallurgy. 2012. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI:10.1002/9781118371350.ch14.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeman L, Sole KC. Accurate measurement of polarization potentials during electrodeposition of nickel metal from sulphate electrolytes. J SAIMM. 2017;117:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashidi AM, Amadeh A. The effect of saccharin addition and bath temperature on the grain size of nanocrystalline nickel coatings. Surf Coat Technol. 2009;204:353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.07.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty US, Tripathy BC, Das SC, et al. Effect of sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) on nickel electrowinning from acidic sulphate solutions. Hydrometallurgy. 2009;100:60–64. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar