Investigation of microstructural and mechanical properties of hot forged 31Mn4 dual phase steel with computer-aided simulations

References

• Barla G, Bonini M, Semeraro M. Analysis of the behaviour of a yield-control support system in squeezing rock. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. 2011;26(1):146–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horyl P, Šňupárek R, Maršálek P. Behaviour of frictional joints in steel arch yielding supports. Arch Min Sci. 2014;59(3):781–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özlü B, Demir H, Türkmen M. The effect of mechanical properties and the cutting parameters on machinability of AISI 5140 steel cooled at high cooling rates after hot forging. J Polytechnic. 2019;22(4):879–887.
   Google Scholar
• Özlü B, Demir H, Türkmen M, et al. Investigation of machinability of cooled microalloy stell in oil after the hot forging with coated and uncoated CBN cutting tools. Sigma J Eng Nat Sci. 2018;36(4):1165–1174.
   Google Scholar
• Tian H, Chen W, Yang D, et al. Numerical analysis on the interaction of shotcrete liner with rock for yielding supports. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. 2016;54:20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Li Z, Zheng M, et al. Modelling and experimental research in hot precision forging of shaft gear. MATEC Web Conf EDP Sci. 2015;21:02005.
   Google Scholar
• Mamedov A, Ozturk H, Makas T. Investigation of mechanical and microstructural properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy depending on hot forging process parameters. Procedia Eng. 2017;207:2155–2160.
   Google Scholar
• Vazquez V, Altan T. Die design for flashless forging of complex parts. J Mater Process Technol. 2000;98:81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuertes JP, Luis CJ, Luri R, et al. Design,: simulation and manufacturing of a connecting rod from ultra-fine grained material and isothermal forging. J Manuf Process. 2016;21:56–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes ALI, Balancin O. Numerical simulation of hot closed die forging of a low carbon steel coupled with microstructure evolution. Mater Res. 2015;18(1):92–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynar A, Gündüz S, Türkmen M. Investigation on the behaviour of medium carbon and vanadium microalloyed steels by hot forging test. Mater Des. 2013;51:819–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Łukaszek-Sołek A, Krawczyk J, Sleboda T, et al. Optimization of the hot forging parameters for 4340 steel by processing maps. J Mater Res Technol. 2019;8(3):3281–3290.
   Google Scholar
• Wang WY, Li J, Liu W, et al. Integrated computational materials engineering for advanced materials: a brief review. Comput Mater Sci. 2019;158(15):42–48.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa JV, De Melo TMF, Santos DB. Dynamic and static softening behavior of a titanium added ultra-low carbon steel during hot and warm deformation. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(3):2810–2817.
   Google Scholar
• Hanamura T, Torizuka S, Tamura S, et al. Effect of austenite grain size on transformation behavior, microstructure and mechanical properties of 0.1 C–5Mn martensitic steel. ISIJ Int. 2013;53:2218–2225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge Jr. AM, Regone W, Balancin O. Effect of competing hardening and softening mechanisms on the flow stress curve modeling of ultra-low carbon steel at high temperatures. J Mater Process Technol. 2003;142(2):415–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Chandrashekhara K, Buchely MF, et al. Experiment and simulation of static softening behavior of alloyed steel during round bar hot rolling. J Manuf Process. 2020a;52:281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Chen W, Feng S, et al. Dynamic recrystallization behavior and interfacial bonding mechanism of 14Cr ferrite steel during hot deformation bonding. J Mater Sci Technol. 2020;43:92–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Kömi J, Mula S. Flow stress characteristics and design of innovative 3-steps multiphase control thermomechanical processing to produce ultrafine grained bulk steels. Mater Des. 2020;186:108297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurt G, Yaşar N. Comparison of experimental, analytical and simulation results for hot rolling of S275JR quality steel. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(3):5204–5215.
   Google Scholar
• Palma-Elvira ED, Garnica-Gonzalez P, Pacheco-Cedeño JS, et al. Microstructural development and mechanical properties during hot rolling and annealing of an automotive steel combining TRIP/TWIP effects. J Alloys Compd. 2019;798:45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Zuhang R, Xiao Z, et al. Microstructure and properties of Cu-10 wt% Fe alloy produced by double melt mixed casting and multi-stage thermomechanical treatment. J Alloys Compd. 2020b;820:153323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIN 21530-3 Standard. Deutsches Institut für Normung, Ausbau für den Bergbau, Teil 3: Anforderungen, May 2003.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E112–10. Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size.
   Google Scholar
• Belyakov A, Zherebtsov S, Tikhonova M, et al. Kinetics of grain refinement in metallic materials during large strain deformation. Mater Phys Mech. 2015;24:224–231.
   Google Scholar
• Chen F, Ren F, Chen J, et al. Microstructural modeling and numerical simulation of multi-physical fields for martensitic stainless steel during hot forging process of turbine blade. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;82:85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huron E, Srivatsa S, Raymond E. Control of grain size via forging strain rate limits for R’88DT. Superalloys. 2000: 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Neishi Y, Akiyama M, Kuroda K, et al. Determination of hot sizing conditions for bar rolling to suppress the grain coarsening phenomenon. Wire J Int. 1998;31:92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Perla S, Kulkarni S, Balachandran G, et al. Influence of section size and grain size on the microstructure evolution and mechanical properties in steel grade AISI 5160. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2017;70:2449–2458.
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi, M., Kubota, S., Ohno, T., Nonomura, T. and Fukui, T. (2001) ‘Grain size prediction of alloy 718 billet forged by radial forging machine using numerical and physical simulation’, In Fifth International Symposium on Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives, p.291–300.
   Google Scholar
• Ceschini L, Morri A, Pivetti G. Predictive equations of the tensile properties based on alloy hardness and microstructure for an A356 gravity die cast cylinder head. Mater Des. 2011;32(3):1367–1375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlina EJ, Van Tyne CJ. Correlation of yield strength and tensile strength with hardness for steels. J Mater Eng Perform. 2008;17:888–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabor D. The hardness and strength of metals. J Inst Met. 1951;79.
   Google Scholar