Survey of new, single-layer architectural paints

References

• Wright DM, Bradley MJ, Mehltretter AH. Analysis and discrimination of architectural paint samples via a population study. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;209(1-3):86–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM International. ASTM E1610-14. Standard Guide for Forensic Paint Analysis and Comparison. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruin, R. RDBMerge, Excel Merge Add-in for Excel for Windows [Internet]. Monster, The Netherlands:2013 [cited 2013 February 15]. Available from: http://www.rondebruin.nl/win/addins/rdbmerge.htm
   Google Scholar
• Goodpaster JV, Sturdevant AB, Andrews KL, Brun-Conti L. Identification and comparison of electrical tapes using instrumental and statistical techniques: I. Microscopic surface texture and elemental composition. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(3):610–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brereton RG. Chemometrics. Data Analysis for the Laboratory and Chemical Plant. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley; 2003; p. 213.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie NWM. Getting started with NIST DTSA-II. Micros Today. 2011;19(1): 26, 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• McIntee E, Viglino E, Kumor S, Rinke C, Ni L, Sigman ME. Non-parametric permutation test for the discrimination of float glass samples based on LIBS spectra. J Chemom. 2010;24(6):312–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntee E, Viglino E, Rinke C, Kumor S, Ni L, Sigman ME. Comparative analysis of automotive paints by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy and nonparametric permutation tests. Spectrochim Acta Part B: At Spectrosc. 2010;65(7):542–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smalldon KW, Moffat AC. The calculation of discriminating power for a series of correlated attributes. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1973;13(4):291–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tippett CF. Car distribution statistics and the hit-and-run driver. Med Sci Law. 1964;4(2):91–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryland SG, Kopec RJ, Somerville PN. The evidential value of automobile paint. Part II: frequency of occurrence of topcoat colors. J Forensic Sci. 1981;26(1):64–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckle JL, Fung T, Ohashi KN. Automotive topcoat colours: occurrence frequencies in Canada. Can Soc Forensic Sci J. 1987;20(2):45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson F, Bunford J, Maynard P, Roux C. Surveys of vehicle colour frequency and the transfer of vehicle paints to stationary objects in Sydney, Australia. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;248:124–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippett CF, Emerson VJ, Fereday MJ, Lawton F, Richardson A, Jones LT, Lampert SM. The evidential value of the comparison of paint flakes from sources other than vehicles. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1968;8(2-3):61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins B. The evidential value of paint flakes, with special reference to electron probe microanalysis. Paper presented at: Australian National Symposium on the Forensic Sciences. Proceedings of the third Australian National Symposium on the Forensic Sciences;1973 February 13-17; Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan PJ, Keeley RH. Comparison and classification of small paint fragments by x-ray microanalysis in the SEM. Scan Electron Microsc. 1979;1:449–454.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner L. The discrimination of modern household paints using the scanning electron microscope energy dispersive x-ray analyser (SEM-EDXA). Unpublished report, Aldermaston, Reading, Berkshire, UK: Home Office Central Research Establishment; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• SWGMAT. Standard guide for using scanning electron microscopy/x-ray spectrometry in forensic paint examinations. Forensic Sci Commun. 2002;4(4):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ryland SG. Discrimination of retail black spray paints. J Am Soc Trace Evid Exam. 2010;1(2):109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Kvalheim OM, Brakstad F, Laing Y-Z. Preprocessing of analytical profiles in the presence of homoscedastic or heteroscedastic noise. Anal Chem. 1994;66(1):43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beam TL, Willis WV. Analysis protocol for discrimination of automotive paints by SEM-EDXA using beam alignment by current centering. J Forensic Sci. 1990;35(5):1055–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietjens M. Reduction of error propagation due to normalization: effect of error propagation and closure on spurious correlations. Anal Chim Acta. 1995;316(2):205–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson E, Wold S, Sjödin K. Minimizing effects of closure on analytical data. Anal Chem. 1984;56(9):1685–1688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryland SG, Kopec RJ. The evidential value of automobile paint chips. J Forensic Sci. 1979;24(1):140–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbury DE. Misidentification of X-ray peaks by automatic peak identification procedures: exploring the situation for minor and trace elemental constituents. Microsc Microanal. 2006;12(S02):838–839.
   Google Scholar
• Newbury DE, Ritchie NWM. Faults and foibles of quantitative scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDS). Proc SPIE. 2012;8378:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Limandri SP, Vasconcellos MAZ, Hinrichs R, Trincavelli JC. Experimental determination of cross sections for K-shell ionization by electron impact for C, O, Al, Si, and Ti. Phys Rev A. 2012;86(4):042701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zieba-Palus J, Borusiewicz R. Examination of multilayer paint coats by the use of infrared, Raman and XRF spectroscopy for forensic purposes. J Mol Struc. 2006;792-793(1):286–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlethaler C, Massonnet G, Deviterne M, Bradley M, Herrero A, Diaz de Lezana I, Lauper S, Dubois D, Geyer-Lippmann J, Ketterer S, Milet S, Bertrand M, Langer W, Plage B, Gorzawski G, Lamothe V, Turunen R. Survey on batch-to-batch variation in spray paints: A collaborative study. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;229(1-3):80–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totty RN, Dubery JM, Evett OW, Renshaw ID. X-ray microprobe analysis of coated papers used in photocopying processes. Forensic Sci Int. 1979;13(1):31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein J, Newbury D, Joy D, Lyman C, Echlin P, Lifshin E, Sawyer L, Michael J. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Springer; 2003; p.274
   Google Scholar