Les paramètres clés de l'interprétation des fibres textiles en sciences criminelles. Partie I: Occurrence et bruit de fond

Références

• Robertson B, Vignaux GA. Probability - The logic of the law. Oxf J Leg Stud. 1993;13(4):457–478.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken CGG, Taroni F. Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensics scientists. 2nd ed. Chichester (England): John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lindley DV. The use of statistics in forensic science. Chichester (England): Ellis Horwood Limited; 1991. Chapter, Probability.
   Google Scholar
• Savage LJ. The foundations of statistics. 2nd ed. New York (USA): Dover Publications Inc.; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• De Finetti B. Probabilità E Induzione (Induction and probability). Bologne (Italy): Editrice Clueb; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Sivia DS, Skilling J. Data analysis - a bayesian tutorial. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson B, Vignaux GA. Interpreting evidence: evaluating forensic science in the courtroom. Chichester, West Sussex: J. Wiley; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ, Lambert JA. A model for case assessment and interpretation. Sci Justice. 1998;38(3):151–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evett IW, Jackson G, Lambert JA. More on the hierarchy of propositions: Exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions. Sci Justice. 2000;40(1):3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taroni F, Bozza S, Aitken C. Decision analysis in forensic science. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50(4):894–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champod C, Taroni F. Forensic examination of fibres. London: Taylor & Francis; 1999. Chapter 13.3, The Bayesian Approach.
   Google Scholar
• Taroni F, Bozza S, Biedermann A, Garbolino P, Aitken C. Data analysis in forensic science: A bayesian decision perspective. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson B, Vignaux GA. Human identification: The use of DNA markers. Netherlands: Springer; 1995. Chapter 16, DNA evidence: wrong answers or wrong questions?
   Google Scholar
• Robertson J, Grieve MC (Eds.). Forensic examination of fibres. 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Roux C, Margot P. The population of textile fibres on car seats. Sci Justice. 1997;37(1):25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massonnet G, Schiesser M, Champod C. Population of textile fibres on white T-shirts. Paper presented at: 6th European Fibres Group Meeting; 1998; Dundee, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Oliver S. The population of coloured fibres in human head hair. Sci Justice: J Forensic Sci Soc. 2004;44(2):83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Burch HJ. The population, transfer and persistence of fibres on the skin of living subjects. Sci Justice. 2009;49(4):259–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignan SJ, Murphy K. Fibre evidence from fingernail clippings. Canadian Soc Forensic Sci J. 2002;35(1):17–21.
   Google Scholar
• McBride A, Brown R. Fibres under fingernails. Paper presented at: 13th EFG Meeting; 2005; Bled, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Grieve MC, Biermann TW. The population of coloured textile fibres on outdoor surfaces. Sci Justice. 1997;37(4):231–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepot L, Vanden Driessche T, Lunstroot K, Barret A, Gason F, De Wael K. Extraneous fibre traces brought by river water — A case study. Sci Justice. 2017;57(1):53–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazic J, Caron N, Dufros Y. Population of textile fibres in public places. Paper presented at: 20th EFG Meeting; 2012; Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Fong W, Inami SH. Results of a study to determine the probability of chance match occurrences between fibers known to be from different sources. J Forensic Sci. 1986;31(1):65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieve MC, Dunlop JT. A practical aspect of the Bayesian interpretation of fibre evidence. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1992;32(2):169–175.
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell S, Roux C, Maynard P, Robertson J. A textile fibre survey as an aid to the interpretation of fibre evidence in the Sydney region. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;123(1):48–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Was-Gubala J. Comparative population studies of fibres secured in Poland, Czech Republic and Germany. Probl Forensic Sci. 2004;60(LX):58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Watt R, Roux C, Robertson J. The population of coloured textile fibres in domestic washing machines. Sci Justice. 2005;45(2):75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieve MC, Biermann TW, Schaub K. The individuality of fibres used to provide forensic evidence – not all blue polyesters are the same. Sci Justice. 2005;45(1):13–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassista A, Peters A. Survey of red, green and blue cotton fibres. Canadian Soc Forensic Sci J. 1997;30(4):225–231.
   Google Scholar
• Grieve MC, Dunlop J, Haddock P. An assessment of the value of blue, red, and black cotton fibers as target fibers in forensic science investigations. J Forensic Sci. 1988;33(6):1332–1344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzini P, Massonnet G. The analysis of colored acrylic, cotton, and wool textile fibers using micro-Raman spectroscopy. Part 2: Comparison with the traditional methods of fiber examination. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60(3):712–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones J, Coyle T. Automotive flock and its significance in forensic fibre examinations. Sci Justice. 2010;50(2):77–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petraco N, Kubic T. Colour atlas and manual of microscopy for criminalists, chemists, and conservators. Appendix C. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC; 2004. Chapter, Synthetic Fibers.
   Google Scholar
• Grieve MC, Biermann TW, Davignon M. The evidential value of black cotton fibres. Sci Justice. 2001;41(4):245–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieve MC, Biermann TW, Davignon M. The occurrence and individuality of orange and green cotton fibres. Sci Justice. 2003;43(1):5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann TW. Blocks of colour IV: the evidential value of blue and red cotton fibres. Sci Justice. 2007;47(2):68–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Hutchinson W, Fryer V. The discrimination of (non-denim) blue cotton. Sci Justice. 2009;49(1):12–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones G, Massonnet G. The analysis of light blue cottonfFibers using Raman spectroscopy and microspectrophotometry. Paper presented at: 17th EFG Meeting; 2009; Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Buzzini P, Massonnet G. The discrimination of colored acrylic, cotton, and wool textile fibers using micro-Raman spectroscopy. Part 1: In situ detection and characterization of dyes. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58(6):1593–1600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R. The evaluation of fibre evidence in the investigation of serious crime [PhD Thesis]. [Lausanne (Switzerland)]: University of Lausanne; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann TW, Grieve MC. A computerized data base of mail order garments: A contribution toward estimating the frequency of fibre types found in clothing. Part 2: The content of the data bank and its statistical evaluation. Forensic Sci Int. 1996;77(1–2):75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann TW, Grieve MC. A computerized data base of mail order garments: A contribution toward estimating the frequency of fibre types found in clothing. Part 1: The system and its operation. Forensic Sci Int. 1996;77(1–2):65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux C. La valeur indiciale des fibres textiles découvertes sur un siège de voiture: problèmes et solutions [Thèse de doctorat]. [Lausanne (Suisse)]: Université de Lausanne; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Langdon S. The evidential value of textile fibres in criminal investigations [PhD Thesis]. [Sydney (Australia)]: University of Technology Sydney; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Home JM, Dudley RJ. A summary of data obtained from a collection of fibres from casework materials. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1980;20(4):253–261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laing D, Hartshorne A, Cook R, Robinson G. A fiber data collection for forensic scientists—collection and examination methods. J Forensic Sci. 1987;32:364–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornerup A, Wanscher JH. Methuen handbook of colour. London (England): Methuen & Co. Ltd; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson J, Roux C. Forensic examination of fibres. London: Taylor & Francis; 1999. Chapter 5.1, Transfer, Persistence and Recovery of Fibres.
   Google Scholar
• Margot P. La trace, vecteur fondamental de la police scientifique. Revue Int de Criminologie et de Police Technique et Scientifique. 2014;67:72–97.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson J. Forensic examination of fibres. London: Taylor & Francis; 1999. Chapter 5.3, Protocols for Fibres Examination and Initial Preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Evett IW. A quantitative theory for interpreting transfer evidence in criminal cases. Appl Stat. 1984;33(1):25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulkava R. Evidential value of a Cigarette butt and Blue denim fibres in a Homicide case. Paper presented at: 18th EFG Meeting; 2010; London, England.
   Google Scholar
• Roux C, Margot P. An attempt to assess the relevance of textile fibres recovered from car seats. Sci Justice. 1997;37(4):225–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champod C, Taroni F. Bayesian framework for the evaluation of fibre transfer evidence. Sci Justice. 1997;37(2):75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook R, Wilson C. The significance of finding extraneous fibres in contact cases. Forensic Sci Int. 1986;32(4):267–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Chinherende V. A target fiber study using cinema and car seats as recipient items. J Forensic Sci. 1996;41(5):802–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson G, Cook R. The significance of fibres found on car seats. Forensic Sci Int. 1986;32(4):275–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook R, Salter MT, O'Connor AM. The significance of finding extraneous fibres on clothing. Paper presented at: International Association of Forensic Science Meeting; 1993; Düsseldorf, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Burd DQ, Kirk PL. Clothing fibers as evidence - A study of the frequency of occurrence of blue wool fibers. J Crim Law Criminol. 1941;32:353–357.
   Google Scholar
• Brüschweiler W, Grieve MC. A study on the random distribution of a red acrylic target fibre. Sci Justice. 1997;37(2):85–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothe M. Examination of foreign fibre populations. Paper presented at: 5th European Fibres Group Meeting; 1997; Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Cook R, Webb-Salter MT, Marshall L. The significance of fibres found in head hair. Forensic Sci Int. 1997;87(2):155–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly E, Griffin RME. A target fibre study on seats in public houses. Sci Justice. 1998;38(1):39–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins K, Drummond P, Hicks Champod T. A study in relation to the random distribution of four fibre types on clothing (incorporating a review of previous target fibre studies). Sci Justice. 2004;44(3):141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones J, Coyle T. Synthetic flock fibres: A population and target fibre study. Sci Justice. 2011;51(2):68–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle T, Shaw C, Stevens L. The evidential value of fibres used in ‘Hi-Vis’ work wear. J American Soc Trace Evid Exam. 2013;4(2):2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Burnett E, Luff N, Wagner C, Stinga G, Carney C, Sheridan K. The prevalence of two ‘commonly’ encountered synthetic target fibres within a large urban environment. Sci Justice. 2015;55(2):103–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar