References
- Baechtel FS. Forensic science handbook. Vol II. Saferstein R, editor, Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall Inc.; 1988. Chapter 7, The identification and individuality of semen stains; p. 347–369.
- Gaensslen RE. Sourcebook in forensic serology, immunology, and biochemistry. Washington (DC): National Institute of Justice, Department of Justice; 1983.
- Kind S. Methods of forensic science. Vol III. Curry AF, editor, London, UK: Interscience Publishers, John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1964.
- Schiff AF. Reliability of the acid phosphatase test for the identification of seminal fluid. J Forensic Sci. 1978;23(4):833–844.
- Raju PS, Iyengar NK. Acid phosphatase reaction as a specific test for the identification of seminal stains. J Crim L. Criminol Police Sci. 1964;55(4):522–525.
- Kind SS. The use of the acid phosphatase test in searching for seminal stains. J Crim L. Criminol Police Sci. 1957;47(5):597–600.
- Lewis J, Baird A, McAlister C, et al. Improved detection of semen by use of direct acid phosphatase testing. Sci Justice. 2013;53(4):385–394.
- Walker JT. A new test for seminal stains. N Engl J Med. 1950;242(3):110–111.
- Hooft PJ, van de Voorde HP. Interference of body products, food and products from daily life with the modified zinc test and the acid phosphatase test. Forensic Sci Int. 1994;66(3):187–196.
- Romero-Montoya L, Martínez-Rodríguez H, Pérez MA, et al. Relationship of spermatoscopy, prostatic acid phosphatase activity and prostate-specific antigen (p30) assays with further DNA typing in forensic samples from rape cases. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;206(1–3):111–118.
- Gonçalves ABR, de Oliveira CF, Carvalho EF, et al. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of colorimetric and immunochromatographic presumptive methods for forensic semen detection. Forensic Sci Int: Genetics Suppl Ser. 2017;6:e481–e483.
- Rodriguez JJRB, Calacal GC, Laude RP, et al. Integrating presumptive and confirmatory semen tests into DNA profiling of sexual assault evidence: a Philippine example. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2019;9:45.
- Vennemann M, Scott G, Curran L, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of presumptive tests for blood, saliva and semen. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014;10(1):69–75.
- Foti AG, Herschman HR, Cooper JF. Comparison of human prostatic acid phosphatase by measurement of enzymatic activity and by radioimmunoassay. Clin Chem. 1977;23(1):95–99.
- Lundquist F. Studies on the biochemistry of human semen. II. Some properties of prostatic phosphatase. Acta Phys Scand. 1947;14(3):263–275.
- Reiner JM, Tsuboi KK, Hudson PB. Acid phosphatase. IV fluoride inhibition of prostatic acid phosphatase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1955;56(1):165–183.
- Tsuboi KK, Hudson PB. Acid phosphatase. III. Specific kinetic properties of highly purified human prostatic phosphomonoesterase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1955;55(1):191–205.
- Gorzkiewicz M, Wozniak M, Grzybowski T, et al. Identification of semen in bloodstains with the use of alternative light source and biochemical screening tests. Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2008;58(4):182–187.
- Bradford LW. Handling and preserving blood alcohol test samples. J Crim L Criminol. 1950;41(1):107–109.
- Chan AY, Swaminathan R, Cockram CS. Effectiveness of sodium fluoride as a preservative of glucose in blood. Clin Chem. 1989;35(2):315–317.