Effect of decontamination agents following biological contamination on fingermarks, footwear, documents and DNA

References

• Wilkinson D. Friction ridge detection from challenging crime scenes. In: Ramotowski R, editor. Lee and Gaensslen’s advances in fingerprint technology. 3rd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson DA, Hancock J, Lecavalier P, et al. The recovery of fingerprint evidence from crime scenes contaminated with chemical warfare agents. J Forensic Ident. 2005;55(3):326–361.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald D, Pope H, Miskelly GM. The effect of chlorine and hydrogen chloride on latent fingermark evidence. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;179:70–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson DA, Larocque S, Lecavalier P, et al. The recovery of footwear evidence from crime scenes contaminated with chemical warfare agents. Identif Canada. 2005;28(4):4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson DA, Sweet D, Fairley D. Recovery of DNA from exhibits contaminated with chemical warfare agents: a preliminary study of the effect of decontamination agents and chemical warfare agents on DNA. Can Soc Forensic Sci J. 2007;40(1):15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson D, Larocque S, Astle C, et al. The effects of aerosolized bacteria on fingerprint impression evidence. J Forensic Ident. 2009;59(1):65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Zuidberg MC, van Woerkhom T, de Bruin KG, et al. Effects of CBRN decontaminants in common use by first responders on the recovery of latent fingerprints – assessment of the loss of ridge detail on glass. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59(1):61–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramotowski RS, Regen EM. The effect of electron beam irradiation on forensic evidence. 1. Latent print recovery on porous and non-porous surfaces. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50(2):298–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramotowski R, Regen EM. The effect of electron beam irradiation on forensic evidence. 2. Analysis of writing inks on porous surfaces. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(3):604–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withrow AG, Sikorsky J, Downs U, et al. Extraction and analysis of human nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from electron beam irradiated envelopes. J Forensic Sci. 2003;48(6):1302–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colella M, Parkinson A, Evans T, et al. The recovery of latent fingermarks from evidence exposed to ionizing radiation. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54(3):583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monson KL, Ali S, Brandhagen MD, et al. Potential effects of ionizing radiation on the evidentiary value of DNA, latent fingerprints, hair and fibers: a comprehensive review and new results. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;284:204–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoile R, Walsh SJ, Roux C. Bioterrorism: processing contaminated evidence, the effects of formaldehyde gas on the recovery of latent fingermarks. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(5):1097–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoile R, Banos C, Collela M, et al. Bioterrorism: the effects of biological decontamination on the recovery of electronic evidence. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;209:143–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoile R, Banos C, Collela M, et al. Gamma irradiation as a biological decontaminant and its effects on common fingermark detection techniques and DNA profiling. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(1):171–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson A, Collela M, Evans T. The development and evaluation of radiological decontamination procedures for documents, document inks and latent fingermarks on porous surfaces. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(3):728–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyaki K, Nishiwaki Y, Maekawa K, et al. Effects of sarin on the nervous system of subway workers seven years after the Tokyo subway sarin attack. J Occup Health. 2005;47:299–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone R. U.K. attack puts nerve agent in the spotlight. Science. 2018;359(6382):1314–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Fingerprint Research Group (IFRG). Guidelines for the assessment of fingermark detection techniques. J Forensic Ident. 2014;64(2):174–200.
   Google Scholar
• Frey G, Robertson C, Krishnan J. Decontamination validation of a Class II type A2 biosafety cabinet during laboratory fumigation. Appl Biosaf. 2020;25(1):48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Rastogi VK, Wallace L, Smith LS, et al. Quantitative method to determine sporicidal decontamination of building surfaces by gaseous fumigants and issues related to laboratory-scale studies. App Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(11):3688–3694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korich DG, Mead JR, Madore MS, et al. Effects of ozone, chlorine dioxide, chlorine and monochloramine on Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst viability. App Environ Microbiol. 1990;56(5):1423–1428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastogi VK, Ryan SP, Wallace L, et al. Systematic evaluation of the efficacy of chlorine dioxide in decontamination of building interior surfaces contaminated with anthrax spores. App Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(10):3343–3351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastogi VK, Smith LS, Edginton G, et al. The sporicidal potency of bioxy formulations in decontaminating bio-warfare agents. Clinical Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;2(2):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Holowachuk S. Protocol for Contaminating Evidence with Bacillus thuringiensus, Standard Operating Protocol DRDC Suffield SOP-15-01-006. Suffield: Defense Research and Development Canada; 12 January 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson D, MacKenzie E, Leech C, et al. The results from a Canadian National Field Trial comparing two formulations of 1,8-dazafluoren-9-one (DFO) with 1,2-indanedione. Identif Canada. 2003;26(2):8–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lam R, Wilkinson D, Collins K, et al. The Results from a Canadian National Field Trial comparing 1,8-dazafluoren-9-one (DFO) with 1,2-indanedione-zinc chloride (IND-Zn). Identif Canada. 2013;36(1):4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stoilovic M, Lennard C. Fingermark detection & enhancement. 6th ed. Canberra: National Centre for Forensic Studies; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kent T, editor. Manual of fingerprint development techniques. 2nd ed. Sandridge: Home Office; Revised January 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cox M. A study of the sensitivity and specificity of four presumptive tests for blood. J Forensic Sci. 1991;36(5):1503–1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam R, Wilkinson D, Tse T, et al. Recommended protocols for fingerprint detection on Canadian polymer banknotes-part 1: chemical development. J Forensic Ident. 2014;64(4):375–401.
   Google Scholar
• Bodziak WJ. Footwear impression evidence: detection, recovery and examination. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC; 2000. p. 159–160.
   Google Scholar
• Margot P, Lennard C. Fingerprint detection techniques. 6th ed. Lausanne: Institut de Police Scientifique et de Criminologie, Universite de Lausanne; 1994. p. 167.
   Google Scholar
• Bodziak WJ. Footwear impression evidence: detection, recovery and examination. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC; 2000. p. 145–147.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly S, Lindblom RS, editors. Scientific examination of questioned documents. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Foster and Freeman Ltd. ESDA 2 Electrostatic Detection Apparatus User Manual, 25 Swan Lane, Evesham, Worchestershire, WC11 1TD, UK, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Slack D. DNA Test Report I: Task Number CB-BD-3774, The Bode Technology Group Inc., 2015 March 15.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins CL, Pattison DI, Davies MJ. Hypochlorite-induced oxidation of amino acids, peptides and proteins. Amino Acids. 2003;25:259–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spickett CM, Jerlich A, Panasenko OM, et al. The reactions of hypochlorous acid, the reactive oxygen species produced by myeloperoxidase with lipids. Acta Biochim Pol. 2000;47(4):889–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amerithrax Investigative Summary, The United States Department of Justice, 2010. https://www.justice.gov/archive/amerithrax/docs/amx-investigative-summary.pdf (10 June 2020, date last accessed).
   Google Scholar
• ANSI/ASB Standard 044, Standard for Examination of Documents for Indentations, First Edition, section 5.1.3., 2019. www.asbstandardsboard.org (16 June 2020, date last accessed).
   Google Scholar