Cartographic Design and Usability of Visual Variables for Linear Features

References

• Allen, G. L., Cowan, C. R. M. and Power, H. (2006). ‘Acquiring information from simple weather maps: influences of domain-specific knowledge and general visual–spatial abilities’, Learning and Individual Differences, 16(4), pp. 337–349. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Jankowski, P., Keim, D., Kraak, M. J., MacEachren, A., Wrobel, S. (2007). ‘Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: setting the research agenda’, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(8), pp. 839–857. doi: 10.1080/13658810701349011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M. and Motes, M. A. (2006). ‘Object-spatial imagery: a new selfreport imagery questionnaire’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), pp. 239–263. doi: 10.1002/acp.1182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazhenkova, O. and Kozhevnikov, M. (2009). ‘The new object-spatial-verbal cognitive style model: theory and measurement’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), pp. 638–663. doi: 10.1002/acp.1473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, J. and Johnson, A. P. (2014). ‘Attention to local and global levels of hierarchical Navon figures affects rapid scene categorization’, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1274. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251296/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunswik, E. (1955). ‘Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology’, Psychological Review, 62, pp. 193–217. doi: 10.1037/h0047470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciołkosz-Styk, A. (2012). ‘The visual search method in map perception research’, Geoinformation Issues, 4(1/4), pp. 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, M. and Carpenter, P. A. (1980). ‘Individual differences in working memory and reading’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), pp. 450–466. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
   Google Scholar
• Dong, W., Ran, J. and Wang, J. (2012). ‘Effectiveness and efficiency of map symbols for dynamic geographic information visualization’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 39(2), pp. 98–106. doi: 10.1559/1523040639298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchaine, B., Yovel, G. and Nakayama, K. (2007). ‘No global processing deficit in the Navon task in 14 developmental prosopagnosics’, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(2), pp. 104–113. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, D., Bestgen, A. K., Kuchinke, L. and Dickmann, F. (2014). ‘Grids in topographic maps reduce distortions in the recall of learned object locations’, PLoS ONE, 9(5), 1–10: e98148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrikant, S. I. and Goldsberry, K. (2005). ‘Thematic Relevance and Perceptual Salience of Dynamic Geovisualization Display’ in ICA International Cartographic Conference, A Coruna, Spain, July 9–16. http://www.geo.uzh.ch/~sara/pubs/fabrikant_goldsberry_ica05.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. W., Holzman, P. S., Klein, G. S., Linton, H. B. and Spence, D. P. (1959) Cognitive Control. A Study of Individual Consistencies in Cognitive Behavior: Part 4. Psychological Issues, International Universities Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Garlandini, S. and Fabrikant, S. I. (2009). ‘Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of visual variables for geographic information visualization’, in Spatial Information Theory: 9th International Conference, COSIT 2009 Aber Wrac’h, France, September 21–25, 2009 Proceedings, eds. by Hornsby, K. S., Claramunt, Ch., Denis, M. and Ligozat, G., pp. 195–211, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsberry, K. (2008). ‘GeoVisualization of Automobile Congestion’, in GeoVisualization of Dynamics, Movement and Change, Proceedings of the AGILE 2008 Conference. Girona, Spain, May 5, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Graff, M. (2003). ‘Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style’, British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), pp. 407–418. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A. L. (2008). ‘Visual Variables’, in Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Science, ed. by Kemp, K., pp. 506–509, SAGE Publication, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, U., Chater, N. and Richardson, L. B. (2003). ‘Similarity as transformation’, Cognition, 87, pp. 1–32. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00184-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Canham, M. S. and Fabrikant, S. I. (2010). ‘Thinking about the weather: how display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), pp. 37–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M. and Hollingworth, A. (1999). ‘High-level scene perception’, Annual Review of Psychology, 50, pp. 243–271. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horz, H. and Schnotz, W. (2010). ‘Cognitive load in learning with multiple representations’, in Cognitive Load Theory, ed. by Plass, J. L., Moreno, R. and Brünken, R., pp. 229–252, Cambridge University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G. and Puccio, G. J. (2008). ‘Adaption-innovation and the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: The level-style issue revisited’, in The Creative Problem Solving Group, Inc., http://cpsb.com/research/articles/problem-solving-style/KAI-TTCT.html
   Google Scholar
• Koláčný, A. (1969). ‘Utilitární kartografie cesta k optimální účinnosti kartografické informace’, Geodetický a kartografický obzor, 15(10), pp. 239–244.
   Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). ‘Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: toward an integrated framework of cognitive style’, Psychological Bulletin, 133, pp. 464–481. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lautenschütz, A. K. (2012). ‘Map readers’ assessment of path elements and context to identify movement behaviour in visualisations’, The Cartographic Journal, 49(4), pp. 337–349. doi: 10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. (1995). How Maps Work: Representation, Visualization, and Design, the Guilford Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. and Kraak, M. J. (2001). ‘Research challenges in geovisualization’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28(1), pp. 3–12. doi: 10.1559/152304001782173970
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M., Roth, R. E., O’Brien, J., Li, B., Swingley, D. and Gahegan, M. (2012). ‘Visual semiotics and uncertainty visualization: an empirical study’, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18, pp. 2496–2505. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medyckyj-Scott, D. and Board, C. (1991). ‘Cognitive cartography: a new heart for a lost soul’, in Advances in cartography, ed. by Muller, J. C., pp. 201–230, Elsevier, London.
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. (2009). ‘Cognitive research in GIScience: recent achievements and future prospects’, Geography Compass, 3(5), pp. 1824–1840. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00273.x
   Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). ‘Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception’, Cognitive Psychology, 9, pp. 353–383. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. (1967) Cognitive psychology, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. S. (1999). ‘Using selective attention theory to design bivariate point symbols’, Cartographic Perspectives, 32, pp. 6–28. doi: 10.14714/CP32.625
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. S. (2000). ‘Designing effective bivariate symbols: the influence of perceptual grouping processes’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 27(4), pp. 261–278. doi: 10.1559/152304000783547786
   Google Scholar
• Ogao, P. J. (2002) Exploratory Visualization of Temporal Geospatial Data Using Animation, Ph.D. Thesis, Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Ooms, K., De Maeyer, P., Fack, V., Van Assche, E. and Witlox, F. (2012). ‘Investigating the effectiveness of an efficient label placement method using eye movement data’, The Cartographic Journal, 49(3), pp. 234–246. doi: 10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1984). ‘Visual cognition: an introduction’, Cognition, 18(13), pp. 1–63. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90021-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popelka, S., Dvorský, J., Brychtová, A. and Hanzelka, J. (2013). ‘User typology based on eye-movement paths’, in International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM: Surveying Geology & mining Ecology Management, Vol I., pp. 1041–1048, Sofia.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei, A. R. and Katz, L. (2004). ‘Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the cognitive styles analysis inventory and recommendations for improvement’, Personality and Individual Differences, 36(6), pp. 1317–1327. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00219-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riding, R. and Cheema, I. (1991). ‘Cognitive Styles—an overview and integration’, Educational Psychology, 11(3/4), pp. 193–215. doi: 10.1080/0144341910110301
   Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E. (2001). ‘The relationship between learning style and cognitive style’, Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), pp. 609–616. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00059-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šašinka, Č. (2013) Interindividuální rozdíly v percepci prostoru a map (Interindividual differences in perception of space and maps), Ph.D. thesis, Masaryk University, Brno.
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, T., McMaster, R. B., Kesseler, F., and Howard, H., (2009). Thematic Cartography and Geographic Visualization – 3rd edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Stachoň, Z. Šašinka, Č., Štěrba, Z., Zbořil, J., Březinová, Š. and Švancara, J. (2013). ‘Influence of graphic design of cartographic symbols on perception structure’, Kartographische Nachtrichten, 4, pp. 216–220.
   Google Scholar
• Štěrba, Z., Šašinka, Č., Stachoň, Z., Kubíček, P., and Tamm, S. (2014). Mixed Research Design in Cartography: A Combination of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Kartographische Nachrichten, 64(5), 262–269.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndyke, P. W. and Stasz, C. (1979). ‘Individual differences in procedures for knowledge acquisition from maps’, Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), pp. 137–75. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90006-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidláková, I. (2010). ‘Object – Spatial Imagery Questionnaire (OSIQ)’, Annales Psychologici, 14, pp. 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Voženílek, V., Kaňok, J. et al. (2011). Metody tematické kartografie – Vizualizace prostorových jevů, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.
   Google Scholar
• White, D. A., Myerson, J. and Hale, S. (1997). ‘How cognitive is psychomotor slowing in depression? Evidence from a meta-analysis’, Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 4(3), pp. 166–174. doi: 10.1080/13825589708256645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). ‘Guided search 2.0 A revised model of visual search’, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), pp. 202–238. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1998). ‘What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search?’, Psychological Science, 9(1), pp. 33–39. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. and Horowitz, T. S. (2004). ‘Opinion: what attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), pp. 495–501. doi: 10.1038/nrn1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yovel, I., Revelle, W. and Mineka, S. (2005). ‘Who sees trees before forest? The obsessive-compulsive style of visual attention’, Psychological Science, 16(2), pp. 123–129. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00792.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar