Mixing Methods and Triangulating Results to Study the Influence of Panning on Map Users’ Attentive Behaviour

References

• Atterer, R., Wnuk, M. and Schmidt, A. (2006). ‘Knowing the User’s Every Move: User Activity Tracking for Website Usability Evaluation and Implicit Interaction’, in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, Edinburgh, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, T., Kietzmann, T. C., Wilming, N. and König, P. (2010). ‘Investigating task-dependent top-down effects on overt visual attention’, Journal of Vision, 10(3), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1167/10.3.15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindemann, M. (2010). ‘Scene and screen center bias early eye movements in scene viewing’, Vision Research, 50(23), pp. 2577–2587. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleisch, S. (2011). Evaluating the Appropriateness of Visually Combining Abstract Quantitative Data Representations with 3D Desktop Virtual Environments Using Mixed Methods, City University London, London.
   Google Scholar
• Borji, A. and Itti, L. (2014). ‘Defending Yarbus: Eye movements reveal observers’ task’, Journal of Vision, 14(3), pp. 29. doi: 10.1167/14.3.29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulos, M. N. (2005). ‘Web GIS in practice III: creating a simple interactive map of England’s strategic Health Authorities using Google Maps API, Google Earth KML, and MSN Virtual Earth Map Control’, International Journal of Health Geographics, 4(1), pp. 22. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-4-22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brewster, S. (2002). ‘Overcoming the lack of screen space on mobile computers’, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6(3), pp. 188–205. doi: 10.1007/s007790200019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodersen, L., Andersen, J. H. K. and Weber, S. (2001). ‘Applying the eye-movement tracking for the study of map perception and map design’, Kort and Matrikelstyrelsen, ed. by Kerren, A., Stasko, J. T., Fekete, J. and North, C., pp. 98, National Survey and Cadastre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Carpendale, S. (2008). ‘Evaluating information visualizations’, in Information Visualization, pp. 19–45, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, W. (2012). ‘Neocartography: opportunities, issues and prospects’, South African Journal of Geomatics, 1(1), pp. 14–31.
   Google Scholar
• Çöltekin, A. (2015). ‘Mix Well Before Use: Understanding the Key Ingredients of User Studies’, in Proceedings of Workshop “Envisioning the Future of Cartographic User Research”, Curitiba, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Cöltekin, A., Demsar, U., Brychtova, A. and Vandrol, J. (2014). ‘Eye-hand Coordination During Visual Search on Geographic Displays’, in Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Eye Tracking for Spatial Research, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• corporate-eye (2013). Google and Facebook Rule Digital in 2013. [online] Available at: <http://www.corporate-eye.com/main/google-and-facebook-rule-digital-in-2013/> (Accessed 09-01-2015).
   Google Scholar
• Delikostidis, I. (2011). ‘Improving the usability of pedestrian navigation systems’, Enschede, University of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC).
   Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye Tracking Methodology – Theory and Practice, Springer, London.
   Google Scholar
• eweek (2012). Google Maps Are More Popular Than Ever: 10 Reasons Why. [online] Available at: <http://www.eweek.com/mobile/google-maps-are-more-popular-than-ever-10-reasons-why> (Accessed 09-01-2015).
   Google Scholar
• Fabrikant, S. I. and Lobben, A. (2009). ‘Introduction: cognitive issues in geographic information visualization’, Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 44(3), pp. 139–143. doi: 10.3138/carto.44.3.139
   Google Scholar
• Fabrikant, S. I., Rebich-Hespanha, S., Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G. and Montello, D. R. (2008). ‘Novel method to measure inference affordance in static small-multiple map displays representing dynamic processes’, The Cartographic Journal, 45(3), pp. 201–215. doi: 10.1179/000870408X311396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibin, M., Singleton, A., Milton, R., Mateos, P. and Longley, P. (2008). ‘An exploratory cartographic visualisation of London through the Google Maps API’, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 1(2), pp. 85–97. doi: 10.1007/s12061-008-9005-5
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. and Erle, S. (2006). Google Maps Hacks, O’Reilly Media Inc, Sebastopol, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. H. and Kotval, X. P. (1999). ‘Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs’, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(6), pp. 631–645. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00068-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. H., Stimson, M. J., Lewenstein, M., Scott, N. and Wichansky, A. M. (2002). ‘Eye Tracking in Web Search Tasks: Design Implications’, in Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., Singleton, A. and Parker, C. (2008). ‘Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the geoweb’, Geography Compass, 2(6), pp. 2011–2039. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00167.x
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H. and Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (1994). ISO9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) Part 11: Guidance on usability.
   Google Scholar
• istockanalyst (2013). Google Inc (GOOG): Sizing Google’s Revenue Opportunity From Local Ads, Maps. [online] Available at: <http://www.istockanalyst.com/finance/story/6481985/google-inc-goog-sizing-google-s-revenue-opportunity-from-local-ads-maps> (Accessed 09-01-2015).
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, R. and Karn, K. (2003). ‘Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises’, in The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, ed. by Radach, R., Hyona, J. and Deubel, H., pp. 573–605, Elsevier, Amsterdan.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, R. M. and Hornbæk, K. (2011). ‘Sizing up Visualizations: Effects of Display Size in Focus+ Context, Overview+ Detail, and Zooming Interfaces’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Kraak, M. J. and Brown, A. (2001). Web Cartography: Developments and Prospects, Taylor & Francis, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Luebbering, C. R., Carstensen, L. W., Campbell, J. B. and Grossman, L. S. (2008). ‘Expanding display size and resolution for viewing geospatial data: A user study with multiple-monitor high-resolution displays’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 35(3), pp. 203–219. doi: 10.1559/152304008784864686
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. and Kraak, M. J. (2001). ‘Research challenges in geovisualization’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28(1), pp. 3–12. doi: 10.1559/152304001782173970
   Google Scholar
• Maggi, S. and Fabrikant, S. I. (2014). ‘Triangulating Eye Movement Data of Animated Displays’, in Proceedings of ET4S@ GIScience, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Mashable (2013). Google Maps: 100+ Best Tools and Mashups. [online] Available at: <http://mashable.com/2009/01/08/google-maps-mashups-tools/> (Accessed 09-01-2015).
   Google Scholar
• Matlin, M. W. (2009). Cognition, 7th ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. C. (2006). ‘A Beast in the Field: The Google Maps Mashup as GIS/2’, Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 41(3), pp. 187–199. doi: 10.3138/J0L0-5301-2262-N779
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. (2009). ‘Cognitive research in GIScience: Recent achievements and future prospects’, Geography Compass, 3(5), pp. 1824–1840. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00273.x
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Nivala, A.-M. (2007). Usability Perspectives for the Design of Interactive Maps, University of Technology, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. (2007). ‘What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software’, Communications and Strategies, 65(1), pp. 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ooms, K., Coltekin, A., De Maeyer, P., Dupont, L., Fabrikant, S. I., Incoul, A., Kuhn, M., Slabbinck, H., Vansteenkiste, P. and Van der Haegen, L. (2015). ‘Combining user logging with eye tracking for interactive and dynamic applications’, Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), pp. 977–993. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0542-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooms, K., De Maeyer, P. and Fack, V. (2013). ‘Study of the attentive behavior of novice and expert map users using eye tracking’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41(1), pp. 37–54. doi: 10.1080/15230406.2013.860255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paganelli, L., Patern, F. and #242. (2002). ‘Intelligent Analysis of User Interactions with Web Applications’, in Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, San Francisco, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. J. and Itti, L. (2007). ‘Beyond Bottom-up: Incorporating Task-dependent Influences into a Computational Model of Spatial Attention’, in Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007. IEEE Conference on CVPR’07.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. P., ed. (2003). Maps and the Internet, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, A. and Ball, L. J. (2006). ‘Eye tracking in human computer interaction and usability research: Current status and future prospects’, in Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, ed. by Ghaoui, C., 211–219, Idea Group, Hershey, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (2011). Interacting with Maps: The Science and Practice of Cartographic Interaction, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E., Ross, K. S. and MacEachren, A. M. (2015). ‘User-centered design for interactive maps: A case study in crime analysis’, Isprs International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(1), pp. 262–301. doi: 10.3390/ijgi4010262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. and Chisnell, D. (2008). Handbook of Usability Testing. How to Plan, Design and Conduct Effective Tests, 2nd ed., Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (1992). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-computer Interaction, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Tatler, B. W. (2007). ‘The central fixation bias in scene viewing: Selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions’, Journal of Vision, 7(14), pp. 4. doi: 10.1167/7.14.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, P.-H., Carmi, R., Cameron, I. G., Munoz, D. P. and Itti, L. (2009). ‘Quantifying center bias of observers in free viewing of dynamic natural scenes’, Journal of Vision, 9(7), pp. 4. doi:10.1167/9.7.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A. J. (2006). Introduction to Neogeography, O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA.
   Google Scholar
• van Elzakker, C. P. J. M. (2004). The Use of Maps in the Exploration of Geographic Data, Labor Grafimedia b.v, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• van Elzakker, C. P. J. M. and Griffin, A. L. (2013). ‘Focus on geoinformation users: Cognitive and use/user issues in contemporary cartography’, GIM International, 27(8), pp. 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• van Elzakker, C. P. J. M. and Wealands, K. (2007). ‘Use and users of multimedia cartography’, in Multimedia Cartography, ed. by Cartwright, W., Peterson, M., Gartner, G., pp. 487–504, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F. and Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The Think Aloud Method. A Practical Guide to Modeling Cognitive Processes, Academic Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Viaene, P., Vansteenkiste, P., Lenoir, M., De Wulf, A. and De Maeyer, P. (2016). ‘Examining the validity of the total dwell time of eye fixations to identify landmarks in a building’, Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9(3), pp. 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virrantaus, K., Fairbairn, D. and Kraak, M. J. (2009). ‘ICA research agenda on Cartography and GIScience’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 36(2), pp. 209–222. doi: 10.1559/152304009788188772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitu, F., Kapoula, Z., Lancelin, D. and Lavigne, F. (2004). ‘Eye movements in reading isolated words: Evidence for strong biases towards the center of the screen’, Vision Research, 44(3), pp. 321–338. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar