Community Geography: Addressing Barriers in Public Participation GIS

References

• Barndt, M. (1998). ‘Public participation GIS – barriers to implementation’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 25(2), pp. 105–112. doi: 10.1559/152304098782594607
   Google Scholar
• Barndt, M. (2002). ‘A model for evaluating public participation GIS’, in Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, ed. by Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D., pp. 346–245, Taylor & Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J. and Duncan, J. S. (1992). ‘Introduction’, in Writing Worlds: Discourse, Text, and Metaphor in the Representation of Landscape, ed. by Barnes, T. J. and Duncan, J. S., pp. 1–17, Routledge, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Bauder, H. (2001). ‘Agency, place, scale: Representations of inner city youth identities’, Tijdschrift voor Economishe en Sociale Geographie, 92(3), pp. 279–90. doi: 10.1111/1467-9663.00157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, B., Rees, A., Frazier, A. D. and Bryant, C. L. (2015). ‘Integrating theatre and geography to develop spatial thinking in youth’, Theatre Symposium, 23, pp. 67–80. doi: 10.1353/tsy.2015.0007
   Google Scholar
• Block, D. and Bouman, M. (2007). ‘Paradoxes of praxis: Community-based learning at the community-based university’, in Pedagogies of Praxis, ed. by Hofman, N. and Rosing, H., pp. 95–110, Anker Publishing, Bolton, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. and Kyttä, M. (2014). ‘Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): a synthesis based on empirical research’, Applied Geography, 46, pp. 122–136. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunge, W. (1971). Fitzgerald: Geography of a Revolution, Schenkman, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B. (1998). ‘Involving young people in neighborhood development,’ Children and Youth Services Review, 20(9–10), pp. 765–95.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, J. and Bosman, M. M. (2005). ‘Measuring the digital divide in the United States: Race, income and personal computer ownership’, Professional Geographer, 57(3), pp. 395–410. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.2005.00486.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, W. J. and Elwood, S. A. (1998). ‘How and why community groups use maps and geographic information’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 25(2), pp. 95–104. doi: 10.1559/152304098782594616
   Google Scholar
• Craig, W. J., Harris, T. H. and Weiner, D. (1999). ‘Report of Varenius workshop.’ Retrieved from http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/varenius/ppgis/PPGIS98_rpt.html.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W. and Krygier, J. (2005). ‘An introduction to critical cartography’, ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 4(1), pp. 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G. and Turner, M. A. (1997). ‘Does neighbourhood matter? Assessing the recent evidence’, Housing Policy Debate, 8, pp. 833–66. doi: 10.1080/10511482.1997.9521280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. (2006). ‘Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions’, Transactions in GIS, 10(5), pp. 693–708. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01023.x
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. and Leitner, H. (1998). ‘GIS and community-based planning: Exploring the diversity of neighborhood perspectives and needs’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 25(2), pp. 77–88. doi: 10.1559/152304098782594553
   Google Scholar
• Gurstein, P., Lovato, P. C. and Ross, S. (2003). ‘Youth participation in planning: Strategies for social action’, Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 12(2), pp. 249–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, R. (2002). ‘Containing children: Some lessons on planning for play from New York City’, Environment and Urbanization, 14, pp. 135–48. doi: 10.1177/095624780201400211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. E. and Tobón, C. (2003). ‘Usability evaluation and PPGIS: Towards a user-centred design approach’, International Journal of GIS, 17(6), pp. 577–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1984). ‘On the history and present condition of geography: An historical materialist manifesto’, The Professional Geographer, 36(1), pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1984.00001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, T. L., Elmore, V., Strong, A., Bennett-Martin, P., Finnie, J., Parkman, J., Harris, T., Singh, J., Edwards, L. and Reed, J. (2015). ‘Mapping non-native invasive species and accessibility in an urban forest: A case study of participatory mapping and citizen science in Atlanta, Georgia’, Applied Geography, 56, pp. 187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindon, S., Pain, R. and Kesby, M. (eds). (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin, D. L. and Johnson, C. E. (2011). ‘Defining and exploring public space: Perspectives of young people from Regent Park, Toronto’, Children’s Geographies, 9(3–4), pp. 439–56.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., Elwood, S., Sheppard, E., McMaster, S. and McMaster, R. (2000). ‘Modes of GIS provision and their appropriateness for neighborhood organizations: Examples from Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota’, URISA Journal, 12(4), pp. 45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., McMaster, R. B., Elwood, S., McMaster, S. and Sheppard, E. (2002). ‘Models for making GIS available to community organizations: Dimensions of difference and appropriateness’, in Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, ed. by Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D., pp. 37–52, Taylor & Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Merrick, M. (2003). ‘Reflections on PPGIS: A view from the trenches’, URISA Journal, 15(APA II), pp. 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. S., Robinson J. A. and Cibula, D. A. (2015). ‘Healthy immigrant effect: Preterm birth among immigrants and refugees in Syracuse, NY’, Journal of Maternal and Child Health, 20, pp. 484–493. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1846-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (2016). http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1560015
   Google Scholar
• Rambaldi, G., Chambers, R., McCall, M. and Fox, J. (2006). ‘Practical ethics for PGIS practitioners, facilitators, technology intermediaries and researchers’, Participatory Learning and Action, 54(1), pp. 106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, A., Becker, B., Bryant, C. and Frazier, A. D. (2016). ‘Shaping our space: Children’s embodiment and engaging nature’, in Children, Nature, City, ed. by Murnaghan, A. M. A., Shillington, L. J., pp. 171–194, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxfordshire.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. and Hawthorne, T. (in press). ‘Making space for community engaged scholarship in geography’, Professional Geographer.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. A. (2010). ‘Syracuse community geography: Evaluating a new approach to participation in geographic information systems.’ Retrieved from https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/record/uuid:d309b9a7-0dc2-40c4-8024-d91158129655.
   Google Scholar
• Rugg, R. D. (2003). ‘A framework for the use of geographic information in participatory community planning and development’, URISA Journal, 15(APA II), pp. 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Sawicki, D. S. and Craig, W. J. (1996). ‘The Democratization of Data: Bridging the Gap for Community Groups’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), pp. 512–523. doi: 10.1080/01944369608975715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawicki, D. S. and Peterman, D. R. (2002). ‘Surveying the extent of PPGIS practice in the United States’, in Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, ed. by Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D., pp. 17–36, Taylor & Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, P. (No date). ‘Report on public participation GIS workshop’, Retrieved from http://www.commoncoordinates.com/ppgis/public.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, R. (2006). ‘Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), pp. 491–507. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement. (2012). A Crucible Moment: College Learning and Democracy’s Future, Association of American Colleges and Universities, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Travlou, P., Owens, P. E., Thompson, C. W. and Maxwell, L. (2008). ‘Environment, identity and experience: Place-mapping as a method to understand teenagers’ engagement with public places’, Children’s Geographies, 6(3), pp. 309–26. doi: 10.1080/14733280802184039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar