Electron Micrographic Observations of Centromeres from Unsectioned Mammalian Chromosomes Isolated by Micrurgy

BIBLIOGRAPHY

• Anderson T. F., 1951. — Techniques for the preservation of threedimensional structure in preparing specimens for the electron microscope. Transactions of the New York Acad, of Sciences, 13: 130–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajer A., 1965. — Behaviour of chromosomal spindle fibres in living cells. Chromosoma, 16: 381–390
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belar K., 1929. — Beitrage zur kausalanalyse der mitose. II. Untersuchungen an der spermatocyten von Chorthippus (Stenobothrus) lineatus Panz. Arch. f. Entwickmech., 118: 359–384.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkley B. R. and Stubblefield E., 1966. — The fine structure of the kinetochore of a mammalian cell in vitro. Chromosoma, 19: 28–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon W. A., 1902. — A cytological basis for the Mendelian laws. Bull Torry Botanical Club, 29: 657–661.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers E. E., 1913. — The Mendelian ratio in relation to certain orthopteran chromosomes. J. Morp., 24: 487–509.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers E. E., 1917. — The segregation and recombination homologous chromosomes as found in two general of Acridida (Orthoptera). J. Morp., 28: 455–521.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman L. C., 1940. — The cytology of Veltheimina viridifolia. Jacq. Am. J. Bot., 27: 887–895.
   Google Scholar
• Comings D. E., 1968. — The rational for an ordered arrangement of chromatin in the interphase nucleus. The Amer. J. Human Genetics, 20: 440–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darlington C. D., 1939. — Misdivision and the genetics of the centromere. J. Genetics, 37: 341–364.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich M. J., 1968. — Organisation du fuseau de caryocinese en prometaphase dans les cellules-meres de microspores du Lis. C. R. Acad. Sci, 266: 579–581.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson-Smith M. A. and Handmaker S. D., 1961. — Observations on the satellited human chromosomes. Lancet, 1: 638–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnden D. S., 1961. — The chromosomes, pp. 32–38. In: L. S. Penrose, ed. Recent Advances in Human Genetics. Boston, Little Brown; London, Churchill.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins G. C., 1965. — Electron microscopic observations of human chromosomes isolated by micrurgy. Nature, 207: 1215–1216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoskins G. C., 1966. — Electron micrographic observations of centromeres from chromosomes of mouse, Chinese hamster, and Man Abst., 3rd International Cong. of Human Genetics, Chicago, Sept., 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins G. C., 1967. — A micrurgical method for preparation of chromosomes for electron microscopy. Proc. Twenty-fifth Anniversary Meeting Electron Microscopy Society of America, Chicago, 128.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins G. C., 1968. — Some observations and considerations of spindle to centromere connections. Abst., The American Society of Human Genetics, Austin, Texas, Oct., 10–13; The American Journal of Human Genetics, 20: 491.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins G. C., Williams V., Smith C. L. and Thornton W. K., 1967. — A method providing precise reproducibility of magnification of electron micrographs. J. Ultrastr. Res., 20: 1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iwata J., 1940. — Studies on chromosome structure. II. Jap. J. Bot., 10: 375–382.
   Google Scholar
• Janssens F. A., 1924. — La chiasmatype dans les insects. La Cellule, 34: 135–359.
   Google Scholar
• Jokelainen P. T., 1967. — The ultrastructure and spacial organization of the metaphase kinetochore in mitotic rat cells. J. Ultrastr. Res., 19: 19–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krishan A. and Buck R. C., 1965. — Structure of the mitotic spindle in L strain fibroblasts. J. Cell. Biol., 24: 433–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lark K. G., Consigli R. A. and Minocha H. C., 1966. — Segregation of sister chromatids in mammalian cells. Science, 154: 1202–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettré H. et LETTRÉ R., 1958. — Un Probleme cytologique: la persistance des structures du fuseau dans l'intervalle des mitoses. Rev. hematol., 13: 337–362.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lima De Faria A., 1950. — The feulgen test applied to centromeric chromeres. Hereditas, 36: 60–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lima De Faria A., 1958. — Recent advances in the study of the kinetochore. Int. Rev. Cytol., 7: 123–157.
   Google Scholar
• Mcclintock B., 1933. — The association of non-homologous parts of chromosomes in the mid-propase of Zea mays. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat., 19: 191–237.
   Google Scholar
• Metzner R., 1894. — Beitrage zur Granulalehre. I. Arch. Anat. Physiol., 309–348.
   Google Scholar
• Mole-Bajer J., 1958. — Cine-micrographic analysis of C-mitosis in endosperm. Chromosoma, 9: 332–358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mota M., 1962. — The ultrastructure of the centromere. Fifth International Congress for Electron Microscopy. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Aug. 29 — sept. 5, Vol. 2, NN-11 New York, Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nebel B. R., 1935. — Chromosomenstructur VI Ein Ausschnitt. Zuchter, 7: 132–136, 155.
   Google Scholar
• Nebel B. R., 1959. — Observations of mammalian chromosome fine structure and replication with special reference to mouse testis after ionizing radiation. Radiation Research Suppl., 1: 431–452.
   Google Scholar
• Nebel B. R. and Coulon E. M., 1962. — The fine structure of chromosomes in pigeon spermatocytes. Chromosoma, 13: 272–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno S., Trujillo J. M. Kaplan W. D. and Kinosita R., 19. — Nucleolus-organisers in the causation of chromosomal anomalies in man. Lancet, 11: 123–125.
   Google Scholar
• Ostergren G., 1947. — Proximal heterochromatin, structure of the centromere and the mechanism of its misdivision. Botaniska Notiser, 2: 176–177.
   Google Scholar
• Ostergren G. et Bajer A., 1960. — L'action Antimitotique et Caryoclasique de Substances Chimiques. J. Turchini & P. Sentein, eds., p. 199, Colloque no 88, C.N.R.S., Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Propach H., 1940. — Die centromeren in der pollenkornmitose von Tradescantia gigantea rose. Chromosoma, 1: 521–525.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins E. and Gonatas N. K., 1964. — The ultrastructure of a mammalian cell during the mitotic cycle. J. Cell Biol., 21: 429–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrader F., 1936. — The kinetochore or spindle fiber locus in Amphiuma tridactylum. Biol. Bull., 70: 484–498.
   Google Scholar
• Schrader F., 1939. — The structure of the kinetochore at meiosis. Chromosoma, 1: 230–237.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp L. W., 1934. — Introduction to Cytology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton W. S., 1903. — The chromosomes in heredity. Biol. Bull., 4: 231–248.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson H. J., 1968. — The fine structure of the kinetochore in meiotic cells of Tradescantia. Planta, 78: 379–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff S., 1964. — The Symposium on Genes and Chromosomes — Structure and Function. Buenos Aires, Argentina, Nov. 30 — Dec. 4, 1964. National Cancer Monograph, Dec. 18, 1965, USPHS Nat. Cancer Inst., Bethesda, Maryland, published U. S. Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe S. L. and Martin P. G., 1967. — Strandedness of chromosomes from two species of Vicia. Twenty-Fifth Annual E.M.S.A. Meeting, Chicago, Aug. 29 — Sept. 1, p. 84.
   Google Scholar
• Woollam D. H. M., Ford E. H. R. and. Millen J. W., 1966. — The attachment of pachytene chromosomes to the nuclear membrane in mammalian spermatocytes. Exp. Cell. Res. 42: 657–661.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zang K. D. and Back E., 1968. — Quantitative studies on the arrangements of human metaphase chromosomes. I. Individual features in the association apttern of the acrocentric chromosomes of normal males and females. Cytogenetics, 7: 455–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar