Dynamics and Ultrastructure of Monocentric Chromosome Movement

REFERENCES

• Bajer A. S., 1973.—Interaction of microtubules and the mechanism of chromosome movement (zipper hypothesis). 1 General principle. Cytobios., 8: 139–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bajer A. S. and Molè-bajer J., 1972.—Spindle dynamics and chromosome movements. Int. Rev. Cytol., 34 suppl. 3: pp. 1–271. Academic Press, New York and London.
   Google Scholar
• Camenzind R., 1966.—Die Zytologie der bisexuellen und parthenogenetischen Fortpflanzung von Heteropeza pygmaea Winnertz, einer Gallmücke mit pädogenetischer Vermehrung. Chromosoma, 18: 123–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camenzind R., 1971.—The cytology of paedogenesis in the gall midge Mycophila speyeri. Chromosoma, 35: 393–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camenzind R., 1974.—Chromosome elimination in Heteropeza pygmaea. I. in vitro observations. Chromosoma, 49: 87–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cimino M. C., 1972.—Egg production, polyploidization and evolution in a diploid all female fish of the genus Poeciliopsis. Evolution, 26: 294–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz R., 1972.—Die Assembly-Hy pot hese der Chromosomenbewegung und die Veränderung der Spindellänge während der Anaphase I in Spermatocyten von Pales ferruginea (Tipulidae, Diptera). Chromosoma, 38: 11–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fiil A. and Moens P. B., 1973.—The development, structure and function of modified synaptonemal complexes in mosquito oocytes. Chromosoma, 41: 37–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forer A. and Jackson Wm. T., 1976.—Actin filaments in the endosperm mitotic spindles in a higher plant, Haemdnthus katherinae Baker. Cytobiologie, 12: 199–214.
   Google Scholar
• Fux Th., 1974.—Chromosome elimination in Heteropeza pygmaea. II. Ultrastructure of the spindle apparatus. Chromosoma, 49: 99–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fux Th., 1976.—The kinetochores of amphitelic univalents in a functionally monocentric spindle. Ultrastructure and three-dimensional morphology. Microbios Letters, 1: 109–115.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer-Duszynska I., 1961.—Chromosome behavior in spermatogenesis of Cecidomyiidae (Diptera). Chromosoma, 11: 499–513.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goessens G. and Lepoint A., 1974.—The fine structure of the nucleolus during interphase and mitosis in Ehrlich tumour cells cultivated in vitro. Exptl. Cell. Res., 87: 63–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes-Schrader S., 1935.—The chromosome cycle of Phenococcus (Coccidae). Biol. Bull., 69: 462–468.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes-Schrader S., 1948.—Cytology of coccids (Coccoidea-Homoptera). Adv. in Genet., 2: 127–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoué S. and Sato H., 1967.—Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement. J. Gen. Physiol., 50: 259–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John B. and Lewis K. R., 1960.—Nucleolar controlled segregation of the sex chromosomes of the beetles. Heredity, 15: 431–439.
   Google Scholar
• Kraczkiewicz Z., 1938.—La spermatogenèse chez Miastor metraloas (Cecidomyidae, Diptera). C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, 127: 1143–1146.
   Google Scholar
• Kraczkiewicz Z., 1950.—Recherches cytologiques sur les chromosomes de Lasioptera rubi Heeg. (Cecidomyidae). Zool. Polon., 5: 73–117.
   Google Scholar
• Kubai D. F., 1973.—Unorthodox mitosis in Trichonympha agilis: Kinetochore differentiation and chromosome movement. J. Cell. Sci., 13: 511–552.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kunz W., Trepte H. H. and Bier K., 1970.—On the function of germ line chromosomes in the oogenesis of Wachtliella persicariae (Cecidomyiidae). Chromosoma, 30: 180–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mcintosh J. R., Hepler P. K. and Van Wie D.G., 1969.—Model for mitosis. Nature, 224:, 659–663.
   Google Scholar
• Metz C. W., 1933.—Monocentric mitosis with segregation of chromosomes in Sciara and its bearing on the mechanism of mitosis. I. The normal monocentric mitosis. II. Experimental modification of the monocentric mitosis. Biol. Bull., 64: 333–347.
   Google Scholar
• Nicklas R. B., 1960.—The chromosome cycle of a primitive cecidomyiid-Mycophila speyeri. Chromosoma, 11: 402–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panelius S., 1971.—Male germ line, spermatogenesis and karyotypes of Heteropeza pygmaea Winnertz (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Chromosoma, 32: 295–331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schrader F., 1951.—A critique of recent hypotheses of mitosis. In: Symposium on Cytology. Michigan State College Press, East Lansing, pp. 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Scott A. C., 1936.—Haploidy and aberrant spermatogenesis in a coelopteran, Micromalthus debilis LeConte. J. Morph., 59: 485–515.
   Google Scholar
• Solari A. J., 1969.—The evolution of the ultrastructure of the sex chromosomes (sex vesicle) during meiotic prophase in mouse spermatocytes. J. Ultrastruct. Res., 27: 289–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ulrich H., Petalas A. and Camenzind R., 1972.—Der Generationswechsel von Mycophila speyeri Barnes, einer Gallmücke mit paedogenetischer Fortpflanzung. Rev. Suisse Zool., 79: 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Welsch B., 1974.—An intranuclear paracrystalloid body in the gametocytes of Panorpa communis (Mecoptera). Chromosoma, 48: 107–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White M. J. D., 1946.—The cytology of the Cecidomyidae (Diptera). II. The chromosome cycle and anomalous spermatogenesis of Miastor. J. Morph., 79: 323–370.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White M. J. D., 1950.—Cytological studies on gall midges. Univ. Texas Publ., 5007: 1–80.
   Google Scholar
• White M. J. D., 1973.—Animal cytology and evolution. University Press, Cambridge, pp. 961.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt I. J., 1964.—Immature stages of Lestremiinae (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) infesting cultivated mushrooms. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 116: 15–27.
   Google Scholar