Dry Mass and Protein Increase during Interphase as A Possible Factor Regulating the Cell Cycle Duration

REFERENCES

• Armstrong S.W. and Francis D., 1985.—Differences in cell cycle duration of sister cells in secondary root meristems of Cocos nucífera L. Ann. Bot., 56: 803–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong S.W. and Francis D., 1987.—Cell and nuclear area, RNA and protein content, and chromosomes counts in meristematic cells of secondary roots and callus of Cocos nucífera. Can. J. Bot., 65: 547–552.
   Google Scholar
• Avanzi S. and Deri P.L., 1969.—Duration of mitotic cycle time in two cultivars of Triticum durum, as measured by 3H thymidine labelling. Caryologia, 22: 187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow P.W. and Macdonald P.D.M., 1973.—An analysis of the mitotic cell cycle in the root meristem of Zea mays. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, B, 183: 385–398.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett M.D., 1972.—Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceaous plants. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, B, 181: 109–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant T.R., 1969.—DNA synthesis and cell division in germinating onion. II. Mitotic cycle and DNA content. Caryologia, 22: 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clowes F.A.L. and Macdonald M.M., 1987.—Cell cycling and the fate of potato buds. Ann. Bot., 59: 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Craigie R.A. and Cavalier-Smith T., 1982.—Cell volume and the control of the Chlamydomonas cell cycle. J. Cell Sci., 54; 173–191.
   Google Scholar
• Dell'aquila A. and Margiotta B., 1986.—DNA synthesis and mitotic activity in germinating wheat seeds aged under various conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot., 26: 175–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essad S., 1974.—Variations du cycle mitotique et des teneurs en ADN chez Vicia sativa L. Mise en évidence de liasons entre les durées des phases du cycle mitotique dans différents groupes botaniques. Caryologia, 26: 357–374.
   Google Scholar
• Gaub J., 1981.—Quantification of nuclear non-histone proteins by Feulgen-Naphthol Yellow S cytopho-tometry. Histochem. J., 13: 717–722.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaub J., Auer G. and Zetterberg A., 1975.—Quantitative cytochemical aspects of combined Feulgen- Naphthol Yellow S staining procedure for the simultaneous determination of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins and DNA in mammalian cell. Exp. Cell Res., 92: 323–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonthier R., Jacqmard A. and Bernier G., 1985.—Occurence of two cell subpopulations with different cell-cycle durations in the central and peripheral zones of the vegetative shoot apex of Sinapis alba L. Planta, 165: 288–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• González-fernández A., Giménez-martín G. and De LA Torre C., 1971.—The duration of the interphase periods at different temperatures in mot tip cells. Cytobiologie, 3: 367–371.
   Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J. 1988.—«Self-tanning»—a new and important source of stoichiometric error in cytophoto- metric determination of nuclea DNA content in plants. PI. Syst. Evol., 158: 87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervás J.P., López-saéz J.F. and Giménez-martin G. 1985.—Proliferation of multinucleated cells with unbalanced nuclei. Cell Biol. Intern. Rep., 9: 91–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Innocenti A.M. and Bitonti M.B., 1983.—Different duration of the mitotic cycle in seedlings browm and black caryopses of Haynaldia villosa Schur. Caryologia, 36: 27–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd A.D., Francis D. and Bennett M.D., 1987.—Replicon size, mean rate of DNA replication and the duration of the cell cycle and its components phases in eight monocotyledonous species of contrasting DNA C values. Ann. Bot., 59: 603–609.
   Google Scholar
• Kuran H., 1979.—Dry mass content in nuclei and cytoplasm during differentiation of the root cortex cells in Helianthus annuus. Folia Histochem. Cytochem., 17: 287–296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marc J. and Palmer J.H., 1984.—Variation in cell-cycle time and nuclear DNA content in the apical meristem of Helianthus annuus L. during the transition to flowering. Amer. J. Bot., 71: 588–595.
   Google Scholar
• Margulis B.A., Barlovskaja V.V. and Semenova E.G., 1987.—The synthesis of actin and tubulin in monolayer and suspension cultures of mouse L-cells. Cytology (URSS), 29: 923–928. (In Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchison J.M., 1971.—The biology of the cell cycle, pp. 21–22, The University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Murata M., Roos E.E. and Tsuchiya T., 1980.—Mitotic delay in root tips of peas induced by artificial seed aging. Bot. Gaz., 141: 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Nougarède A. and Rembour J., 1985.—Le point vegetatif en tant que modèle pour l'étude du cycle cellulaire et de ses points de controle. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. Actual. Bot., 132: 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• NougarÉde A., Rembour J. and Saint-Côme R., 1987.—Rates of cell division in the young prefloral shoot apex of Chrysanthemum segetum L. Protoplasma, 138: 156–160.
   Google Scholar
• Olszewska M.J. and Osiecka R., 1982.—The relationship between 2C DNA content, life cycle type, systematic position, and the level of DNA endoreplication in nuclei of parenchyma cells during growth and differentiation of roots in some monocotyledonous species. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen, 177: 319–336.
   Google Scholar
• Olszewska M.J. and Osiecka R., 1983.—The relationship between 2C DNA content, life cycle type, systematic position and the dynamics of DNA endoreplication in parenchyma nuclei during growth and differentiation of roots in some dicotyledonous herbaceous species. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen, 178: 581–599.
   Google Scholar
• Olszewska M.J., Marciniak K., Kuran H., Damsz B., Osiecka R. and Przezdziecka A., 1983.—Changes in the content of RNA, protein, and dry mass in nuclei, nucleoli, and cytoplasm, and the rate of cell growth during cell cycle in root meristem of Vicia faba L. subsp. minor and subsp. major. Microsc. Acta, 87: 139–158.
   Google Scholar
• Olszewska M.J., Marciniak K., Kuran H., Damsz B., and Bilecka A., 1984.—Cytochemical study of cell cycle parameters in two cultivars of Helianthus annuus L. Dry mass increase as a possible factor regulating cell cycle duration. Caryologia, 37: 177–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrova S.A. and Hudkov I.N., 1983.—Duration of mitotic cycle in the cells of the root meristem in three pea species differing in duration of the vegetative season. Cytol. and Genet. (USSR), 1: 69–71 (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Price H.J. and Bachmann K. 1976.—Mitotic cycle time and DNA content in annual and perennial Microseridinae (Compositae, Cichoriaceae). PI. Syst. Evol., 126: 323–330.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas J.E. and Davidson D., 1982.—Cell cycle kinetics in the primary root of Vicia faba: influence of different ambient water levels. Caryologia 35: 191–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson A. and Macleod R.D., 1979.—Cell doubling time in the apical mm of elongating lateral roots of Vicia faba L. New Phytol., 82: 747–755.
   Google Scholar
• Van't Hof J., 1965.—Relationship between mitotic cycle duration, S period duration and the average rate of DNA synthesis in the root meristem cells of several plants. Exp. Cell Res., 39: 48–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van't Hof J. and Sparrow A.U., 1963.—A relationship between DNA content, nuclear volume, and minimum mitotic cell time. Proc. Natl. Ac. Sci. USA, 49: 897–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma R.S. and Lin M.S., 1979.—The duration of DNA syntetic (S) period in Zea mays: a genetic control. Theor. Appl. Genet., 54: 277–282.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar