Intraspecific variation of nuclear DNA content in plant species

REFERENCES

• Ainsworth C.C., Parker J.S. and Horton D.M., 1983.—Chromosome variation ani evolution in Scilla autumnalis. In: «Kew chromosome conference II», ed. by P.E. Brandham and M.D. Bennett, pp. 261–268, George Allen and Unwin, London.
   Google Scholar
• Baetcke K.P., Sparrow A.H., Nauman C.H. and Schwemmer S.S., 1967.—The relationship of DNA content to nuclear and chromosomes volumes and to radiosensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 58: 553–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett M.D., 1972.—Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc. Royal Soc. London, Ser B, 181: 109–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett M.D., 1985.—Intraspecific variation in DNA amount and the nucleotypic dimension in plant genetics. In: «Plant Genetics», ed. by M. Freeling, pp. 283–302, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett M.D., 1987.—Variation in genomic form in plants and its ecological implications. New Phytol., 106: 177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett M.D. and Smith J.B., 1976.—Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. London, Ser. B, 274: 227–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett M.D., Gustafson J.P. and Smith J.B., 1977.—Variation in nuclear DNA in the genus Secale. Chromosoma, 61: 149–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black C.L. and Beckmann R.L., 1983.—The variability of nuclear DNA and its implications for polyploidy in white ash (Fraxinus americana L.: Oleaceae). Amer. J. Bot., 70: 1420–1423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britten R.J., 1982.—Genome alterations in evolution. In: «Evolution and development», ed. by J.T. Bonner, pp. 163–185, Springer Verlag, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Britten R.J. and Kohne D.E., 1968.—Repeated sequences in DNA. Science, 161: 529–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrozza M.L., Giorgi L. and Cremonini R., 1980.—Nuclear DNA content and number of ribosomal RNA genes in cultivan and selected lines of Durum wheat. Z. Pflanzenzucht., 84: 284–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalier-Smith T., 1978.—Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox. J. Cell Sci., 34: 247–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallini A. and Cionini P.G., 1986.—Nuclear DNA content in differentiated tissues of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Protoplasma, 130: 91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallini A. and Cremonini R., 1985.—Aneusomaty in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Z. Pflanzenzucht., 95: 118–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallini A. and Natali L.—Nuclear DNA variability within Pisum sativum L.: cytophotometric analyses. Plant Syst. Evol., in press.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallini A., Natali L., Sassoli O., Cionini P.G. and Durante M., 1989b.—Analisi biochimiche delle variazioni intraspecifiche del DNA nucleare in Helianthus annuus L. Giorn. Bot. Ital., 123, Suppl. 1: 208.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallini A., Zolfino C., Cionini G., Cremonini R., Natali L., Sassoli O. and Cionini P.G., 1986.—Nuclear DNA changes within Helianthus annuus L.: cytophotometric, karyological and biochemical analyses. Theor. Appl. Genet., 73: 20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallini A., Zolfino C., Natali L., Cionini G. and Cionini P.G., 1989«.—Nuclear DNA changes within Helianthus annuus L.: origin and control mechanism. Theor. Appl. Genet., 77: 12–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cionini P.G.—Nuclear DNA changes during plant development. Giorn. Bot. Ital., in press.
   Google Scholar
• Cremonini R. and Cavallini A., 1986.—Origin and fate of aneusomaty in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Z. Pflanzenzucht, 97: 89–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullis C. A., 1979.—Quantitative variation of ribosomal RNA genes in flax genotrophs. Heredity, 42: 237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullis C. A., 1983.—Enrivonmentally induced changes in plants. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 1: 117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullis C.A. and Cleary W., 1986.—Rapidly varying DNA sequences in flax. Can. J. Genet. Cytol., 28: 252–259.
   Google Scholar
• Cullis C.A. and Davies D.R., 1975.—Ribosomal DNA amounts in Pisum sativum. Genetics, 81: 485–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'amato F., 1985.—Cytogenetics of plant cell and tissues cultures and their regenerates. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 3: 73–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'amato F., 1989.—Polyploidy in cell differentiation. Caryologia, 42: 183–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deumling B. and Clermont L., 1989.—Changes in DNA content and chromosomal size during cell culture and plant regeneration of Scilla siberica: selective chromatin diminution in response to environmental conditions. Chromosoma, 97: 439–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhir N.K. and Miksche J.P., 1974.—Intraspecific variation of nuclear DNA content in Pinus resinosa Ait. Can. J. Genet. Cytol., 16: 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Doerschug E.B., Miksche J.P. and Palmer R.G., 1978.—DNA content, ribosomal-RNA gene number, and protein content in soybeans. Can. J. Genet. Cytol., 20: 531–538.
   Google Scholar
• Doolittle W.F., 1985.—The evolutionary significance of middle repetitive DNAs. In: «The evolution of genome size», ed. by T. Cavalier-Smith, pp. 170–192, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Doolittle W.F. and Sapienza C., 1980.—Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature, 284: 601–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant A., 1962.—The environmental induction of heritable change in Linum. Heredity, 17: 27–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans G.M., 1968.—Nuclear changes in flax. Heredity, 23: 25–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans G.M., Durrant A. and Rees H., 1966.—Associated nuclear changes in the induction of flax genotrophs. Nature, 212: 697–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell R.B., 1982.—Sequence amplification, deletion and reanangement: major sources of variation during species divergence. In: «Genome evolution», ed. by A.G. Dover and R.B. Flavell, pp. 301–323, Academic Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell R.B., 1986.—Repetitive DNA and chromosome evolution in plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 312: 227–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell R.B., O'dell M. and Hutchinson J., 1981.—Nucleotide sequence organization in plant chromosomes and evidence for sequence translocation during evolution. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 45: 501–508.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frolich E. and Nagl W., 1979.—Transitory increase in chromosomal DNA (Feulgen) during floral differentiation in Rhoeo discolor. Cell. Diff., 8: 11–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furuta Y., 1970.—DNA content per nucleus in Aegilops species. Wheat Inf. Serv., 30: 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Furuta Y. and Nishikawa T., 1977.—Quantitative comparison of the nuclear DNA in section Sitopsis of the genus Aegilops. Jap. J. Genet., 52: 107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Greenlee J.K., Rai K.S. and Floyd A.D., 1984.—Intraspecific variation in nuclear DNA content in Collinsia verna Nutt. (Scrophulariaceae). Heredity 52: 235–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J., 1986.—Severely distorted Feulgen-DNA amounts in Pinus (Coniferophytina) after nonadditive fixations as a result of meristematic self-tanning with vacuole contents. Can. J. Genet. Cytol., 28: 409–415.
   Google Scholar
• Greilhuber J., 1988.—«Self-tanning»—a new and important source of stoichiometric error in cytophotometric determination of nuclear DNA content in plants. Plant Syst. Evol., 158: 87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grime J.P., 1983.—Prediction of weed and crop response to climate based upon measurements of nuclear DNA content. Aspects Appl. Biol., 4: 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson J. Rees H. and Seal A.G., 1979.—An assay of the activity of supplementary DNA in Lolium. Heredity, 43: 411–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones K. and Kenton A., 1984.—Mechanisms of chromosome change in the evolution of the tribe Tradescantiae (Commelinaceae). In: «Chromosomes in evolution of eukaryotic groups», ed. by A. Sharma and A.K. Sharma, pp. 143–168, CRC Press, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Kenton A., 1984.—Chromosome evolution in the Gibasis linearis group (Commelinaceae). III. DNA variation, chromosome evolution, and speciation in G. venestula and G. heterophylla. Chromosoma, 90: 303–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurie D.A. and Bennett M.D., 1985.—Nuclear DNA content in the genera Zea and Sorghum. Intergeneric, interspecific and intraspecific variation. Heredity, 55: 307–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi M., Tarquini F., Sgorbati S. and Sparvoli E., 1986.—Determination of DNA content by static cytofluorimetry in nuclei released from fixed plant tissue. Protoplasma, 132: 64–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis W.H., 1980.—Polyploid in species populations. In: «Polyploidy, biological relevance», ed. by W.H. Lewis, pp. 103–144, New York-London, Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mcleish J. and Sunderland N., 1961.—Measurement of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in higher plants by Feulgen photometry and chemical methods. Exp. Cell Res., 24: 527–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello M.L.S. and Vidal B.C., 1980.—Acid lability of deoxyribonucleic acids of some polytene chromosome regions of Rhynchosciara americana. Chromosoma, 81: 419–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miksche J.P., 1968.—Quantitative study of intraspecific variation of DNA per cell in Picea glauca and Pinus banksiana. Can. J. Genet. Cytol., 10: 590–600.
   Google Scholar
• Miksche J.P., 1971.—Intraspecific variation of DNA per ceil between Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Can provenances. Chromosoma, 32: 343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagato Y., Yamamoto K. and Yamashita H., 1981.—Variation in DNA content in Asian rice. Jap. J. Genet., 56: 483–494.
   Google Scholar
• Nagl W., 1979.—Differential DNA replication in plants: a critical review. Z. Pflanzenphysiol., 95: 283–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagl W. and Capesius I., 1976.—Molecular and cytological characteristics of nuclear DNA and chromatin for angiosperm systematics: basic data for Helianthus annuus (Asteraceae). Plant Syst. Evol., 126: 221–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszewska M.J. and Osiecka R., 1983.—The relationship between 2C DNA content, life cycle type, systematic position, and the dynamics of DNA endoreduplication in parenchyma nuclei during growth and differentiation of roots in some dicotyledonous herbaceous species. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanz., 178: 581–599.
   Google Scholar
• Orgel L.E. and Crick F.H.C., 1980.—Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature, 284: 604–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price H.J., 1976.—Evolution of DNA content in higher plants. Bot. Rev., 42: 27–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price H.J.. 1988a.—Nuclear DNA content variation within angiosperm species. Evol. Trends in Plants, 2: 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price H.J., 1988b.—DNA content variation among higher plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 75: 1248–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price H.J., Bachmann K., Chambers K.L. and Riggs J., 1980.—Detection of intraspecific variation in nuclear DNA content in Microseris douglasii. Bot. Gaz., 141: 195–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price H.J., Chambers K.L. and Bachmann K., 1981a.—Genome size variation in diploid Microseris bigelovii (Asteraceae). Bot. Gaz., 142: 156–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price H.J., Chambers K.L. and Bachmann K., 1981b.—Geographic and ecological distribution of genomic DNA content variation in Microseris douglasii (Asteraceae). Bot. Gaz., 142: 415–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price H.J., Chambers K.L., Bachmann K. and Riggs J., 1983.—Inheritance of nuclear 2C DNA content variation in intraspecific and interspecific hybrids of Microseris (Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot., 70: 1133–1138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raina S.N. and Rees H., 1983.—DNA variation between and within chromosome complements of Vicia species. Heredity, 51: 335–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayburn A.L., Price H.J., Smith J.D. and Gold J.R., 1985.—C-band heterochromatin and DNA content in Zea mays. Amer. J. Bot., 72: 1610–1617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka R., 1969.—Speciation and karyotypes in Spiranthes sinensis. J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ., Ser. B, 12: 165–197.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas C.A., 1971.—The genetic organization of chromosomes. Ann. Rev. Genet., 5: 237–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van't Hof J. and Sparrow A.H., 1963.—A relationship between DNA content, nuclear volume, and minimum mitotic cycle time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 49: 897–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walbot V. and Cullis C.A., 1985.—Rapid genome changes in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 36: 367–396.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto K. and Nagato Y., 1984.—Variation in DNA content in the genus Glycine. Jap. J. Breed., 34: 163–174.
   Google Scholar
• Zamir D. and Tadmor Y., 1986.—Unequal segregation of nuclear genes in plants. Bot. Gaz., 147: 355–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar