A comparison of plant chromosome number variation among Corsica, Sardinia and Sicily, the three largest Mediterranean islands

References

• Apg III. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc. 141(4):105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Bedini G, Garbari F, Peruzzi L. 2010 onwards. Chrobase.it. Chromosome numbers for the Italian flora [database]; [cited 2014 Jan 1]. www.biologia.unipi.it/chrobase
   Google Scholar
• Bedini G, Garbari F, Peruzzi L. 2012a. Karyological knowledge of Italian vascular flora as inferred by the analysis of “Chrobase.it”. Plant Biosyst. 146(4):889–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedini G, Garbari F, Peruzzi L. 2012b. Does chromosome number count? Mapping karyological knowledge on Italian flora in a phylogenetic framework. Plant Syst Evol. 298(4):739–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedini G, Garbari F, Peruzzi L. 2012c. Chromosome number variation of the Italian endemic vascular flora. State-of-the-art, gaps in knowledge and evidence for an exponential relationship among even ploidy levels. Comp Cytogen. 6(2):192–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase MW, Reveal JL. 2011. APG III: bibliographical information and synonymy of Magnoliidae. Phytotaxa. 19:71–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenhusz MJM, Reveal JL, Farjon A, Gardner MF, Mill RR, Chase MW. 2011. A new classification and linear sequence of extant gymnosperms. Phytotaxa. 19:55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenhusz MJM, Zhang X-C, Schneider H. 2011. A linear sequence of extant families and genera of lycophytes and ferns. Phytotaxa. 19:7–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gacek P, Góralski G, Joachimiak AJ. 2011. Chromosome numbers and polyploidy in Polish angiosperms. Acta Biol Cracov Bot. 53(2):37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbari F, Bedini G, Peruzzi L. 2012. Chromosome numbers of the Italian flora. From the Caryologia foundation to present. Caryologia. 65(1):62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Góralski G, Bal M, Gacek P, Orzechowski TM, Kosecka-Wierzejska A. 2014. Chromosome number and polyploidy in life forms of Asteraceae, Poaceae and Rosaceae in Polish flora. Acta Biol Cracov Bot. 56(1):7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Góralski G, Judasz A, Gacek P, Grabowska-Joachimiak A, Joachimiak AJ. 2013. Polyploidy, alien species and invasiveness in Polish angiosperms. Plant Syst Evol. 300(2):225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Góralski G, Lubczyńska P, Joachimiak AJ. 2009 onwards. Chromosome Number Database [database]; [cited 2013 Aug 13]. Available from: http://www.chromosomes.binoz.uj.edu.pl/chromosomes/
   Google Scholar
• Hair JB. 1966. Biosystematics of the New Zealand flora 1945–1964. New Zealand J Bot. 4(4):559–595.
   Google Scholar
• Hanelt P. 1966. Polyploidie-Frequenz und geographische Verbretung bei höheren Pflanzen. Biol Runds. 4:183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanmonod D, Gamisans J. 2007. Flora Corsica. Aix-en-Provence: Édisud, 920 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Löve A, Löve D. 1957. Arctic polypoloidy. Proc Genet Soc Canada. 2:23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzi L. 2010. Segnalazioni floristiche per le regioni italiane 2005–2010: una prima analisi dei dati a 5 anni dalla pubblicazione della Checklist della flora vascolare italiana. In: Peccenini S, Domina G, Salmeri C, editors. La biodiversità vegetale in Italia: aggiornamenti sui gruppi critici della flora vascolare. Rome: Società Botanica Italiana; 2010 Oct 22–23; p. 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzi L, Bedini G. 2014. Online resources for chromosome number databases. Caryologia. 67(4):292–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruzzi L, Caparelli KF, Bedini G. 2014. A new index for the quantification of chromosome number variation: an application to selected animal and plant groups. J Theor Biol. 353:55–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruzzi L, Dawson M, Bedini G. 2011. Chromosome number variation in two antipodean floras. AoB Plants. 2011:plr020. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plr020
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzi L, Goralski G, Joachimiak AJ, Bedini G. 2012. Does actually mean chromosome number increase with latitude in vascular plants? An answer from the comparison of Italian. Slovak and Polish floras. Comp Cytogen. 6(4):371–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rice A, Glick L, Abadi S, Einhorn M, Kopelman NM, Salman-Minkov A, Mayzel J, Ofer C, Mayrose I. 2015. The Chromosome Counts Database (CCDB)–a community resource of plant chromosome numbers. New Phytol. 206(1):19–26. doi:10.1111/nph.13191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter DG. 2009. Technical note: curve fitting with the R Environment for Statistical Computing. Enschede (NL): 17, International Institute for Geo-information Science & Earth Observations.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbins GL. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Straume M, Johnson M. 2010. Analysis of residuals: criteria for determining goodness of fit. In: Johnson M, editor. Essential Numerical computer methods. Oxford: Academic Press. p. 37–54.
   Google Scholar