References
- Basow, S. A., & Martin, L. J. (2012). Bias in student evaluations. In M. E. Kite, Effective evaluation of teaching: A guide for faculty and administrators (pp. 40–49). Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Retrieved from http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/evals2012/index.php
- Bernstein, D. (2008). Peer Review and Evaluation of the Intellectual Work of Teaching. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(2), 48–51. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.2.48-51
- Bernstein, D., & Huber, M. T. (2006). What is good teaching? Raising the bar through Scholarship Assessed. In International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC.
- Esarey, J., & Valdes, N. (2020). Unbiased, reliable and valid evaluations can still be unfair. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1724875
- Follmer Greenhoot, A., Ward, D., & Bernstein, D. (2017). Benchmarks for teaching effectiveness. Retrieved from https://cte.ku.edu/rubric-department-evaluation-faculty-teaching
- Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. Special report. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Hutchings, P. (Ed.). (1995). From idea to prototype: The peer review of teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
- Hutchings, P. (Ed.). (1996). Making teaching community property: A menu for peer collaboration and peer review. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
- Lyde, A. R., Grieshaber, D. C., & Byrns, G. (2016). Faculty teaching performance: Perceptions of a multi-source method for evaluation (MME). Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.18145
- MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Recognizing and evaluating science teaching in higher education: Proceedings of a Workshop—In Brief. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25685
- National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13362
- Reinholz, D. L., Corbo, J. C., Dancy, M. H., Deetz, S., and Finkelstein, N. (2015). Towards a Model of Systemic Change in University STEM Education. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, and L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming Institutions: 21st Century Undergraduate STEM Education. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
- Reinholz, D. L., Corbo, J. C., Dancy, M., & Finkelstein, N. (2017). Departmental Action Teams: Supporting faculty learning through departmental change. Learning Communities Journal, 9, 5–32.
- Reinsch, R. W., Goltz, S. M., & Hietapelto, A. B. (2020). Student evaluations and the problem of implicit bias. Journal of College and University Law, 45(1), 114–140.
- Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598–642. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313496870