Doing Mathematics with Purpose: Mathematical Text Types

References

• Alfeld, P. 1996. Why are there infinitely many primes? http://www.math.utah.edu/∼pa/math/q2.html
   Google Scholar
• Alibert, D., and M. Thomas. 2002. Research on mathematical proof. In Advanced Mathematical Thinking, edited by D. Tall, 215–230. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arcavi, A. 2003. The role of visual representation in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 52 (3): 215–241.
   Google Scholar
• Bondy, J. A., and U. Murty. 1976. Graph theory and its implications. London: The Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. 2010. Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G., and P. Pearson. 2012. Reading, writing, and thinking like a scientist. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 55 (7): 580–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, M. 1991. Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, E., and D. Tall. 2002. Advanced mathematical thinking and the computer. In Advanced mathematical thinking, edited by D. Tall, 231–248. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. 2012. Language correlates of disciplinary literacy. Topics in Language Disorders 32 (1): 19–34. http://alliedhealth.ceconnection.com/files/TLD0112B-1337958964160.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., and S. Coatoam. 2013. Disciplinary literacy: What you want to know about it. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy: A Journal from the International Reading Association 56 (8): 627–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., and M. Schleppegrell. 2010. Disciplinary literacies Across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy: A Journal from the International Reading Association 53 (7): 587–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S., A. Britt, W. Brown, G. Cribb, W. George, C. Greenleaf, C. Shanahan, and Project READI. 2016. Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist 51 (2): 219–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., and R. P. Hall. 1997. Practicing representation. Phi Delta Kappan 78 (5): 361–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, G. 2002. Mathematical proof. In Advanced Mathematical Thinking, edited by D. Tall, 54–61. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H., and M. Sailors, editors. 2008. Finding the right texts for beginning and struggling readers: Research-based solutions. NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kaput, J. 1987. Representation systems and mathematics. In Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics, edited by C. Janvier, 19–26. Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kaput, J., M. Blanton, and L. Boreno-Armella. 2008. Algebra from a symbolization point of view. In Algebra in the early grades, edited by J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, and M. Blanton, 19–56. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C. 1993. Functions, graphing, and technology: Integrating research on learning and instruction. In Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions, edited by T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, and T. P. Carpenter, 189–237. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lesh, R., T. Post, and M. Behr. 1987. Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In Problems of Representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics, edited by C. Janvier, 33–40. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. 1980. When is a symbol symbolic? For the Learning of Mathematics 1 (2): 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J., L. Burton, and K. Stacey. 2010. Thinking mathematically (2nd ed.). England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Mesmer, H. A., J. W. Cunningham, E. H. Heibert. 2012. Toward a theoretical model of primary-grade text complexity: Learning from the past, anticipating the future. Reading Research Quarterly 47 (3): 235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. 2008. Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy: A Journal from the International Reading Association 52 (2): 96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. 2015. Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Education Review 85 (2): 254–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimm, D. 1987. Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Polya, G. 1945. How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rider, R. 2007. Shifting from traditional to nontraditional teaching practices using multiple representations. Mathematics Teacher 100 (7): 495–500.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, J. E., and M. S. Waters. 2000. Why representations? The Mathematics Teacher (6): 448–453.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., and T. Shanahan. 2014. Does disciplinary literacy have a place in elementary school? The Reading Teacher 67 (8): 636–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., T. Shanahan, and C. Misischia. 2011. Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines history, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research 43 (4): 393–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., and C. Shanahan. 2008. Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Education Review 78 (1): 40–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianou, D. A., and E. A. Silver. 2004. The role of visual representations in advanced mathematical problem solving: An examination of expert-novice similarities and differences. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal 6 (4): 353–387.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi, P. N. 2008. Developing mathematical understanding through multiple representations. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 13 (8): 438–445.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. A. 2011. A social semiotics framework for conceptualizing content area literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 54 (6): 435–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar