References
- Berliner, D. 2002. Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher 31 (8):18–20.
- Bryk, A. S., L. M. Gomez, A. Grunow, and P. G. LeMahieu. 2015. Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Clandinin, D. J. 1992. Narrative and story in teacher education. In Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection, ed. T. Russell and H. Munby, 124–37. London: The Falmer Press.
- Clandinin, D. J., and F. M. Connelly. 1995. Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Cornetto, K. M., and J. A. Hughes. 2015. June. Building a Teaching Effectiveness Network (BTEN): Coordinating support and feedback for beginning teachers in AISD schools. Department of Research and Evaluation, Austin Independent School District. https://www.austinisd.org/sites/default/files/dre-reports/14.77_Building_a_Teaching_Effectiveness_Network_Coordinating_Support_And_Feedback_for_Beginning_Teachers_in_AISD_Schools.pdf.
- Council of Chief State School Officers’ Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. 2011, April. In TASC model core teaching standards: A resource for state dialogue. http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2011/InTASC_Model_Core_Teaching_Standards_2011.pdf.
- Craig, C. J. 2002. A meta-level analysis of the conduit in lives lived and stories told. Teachers and Teaching 8 (2):197–221.
- Craig, C. J. 2004. The dragon in school backyards: The influence of mandated testing on school contexts and educators’ narrative knowing. Teachers College Record 106 (6):1229–57.
- Darling-Hammond, L., M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner. 2017. Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf.
- Deming, W. E. 1986. Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95.
- Franklin, C., G. Kader, D. Mewborn, J. Moreno, R. Peck, M. Perry, and R. Scheaffer. 2007. Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) Report: A preK-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. http://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/GAISE/GAISEPreK-12_Full.pdf.
- Garet, M. S., J. Heppen, K. Walters, T. Smith, and R. Yang. 2016, November. Does content-focused teacher professional development work: Findings from three institute of education sciences studies (NCEE ED-IES-12-C-0080). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, National Center on Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20174010/pdf/20174010.pdf.
- Garet, M. S., A. C. Porter, L. Desimone, B. F. Birman, and K. S. Yoon. 2001. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal 38 (4):915–45.
- Garet, M., A. Wayne, F. Stancavage, J. Taylor, K. Walters, and M. Song. 2010. Middle school mathematics professional development impact study: Findings after the first year of implementation. NCEE 2010-4009. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20104009/pdf/20104010.pdf.
- Gawande, A. 2007. Better: A surgeon’s notes on performance. New York: Picador.
- Hattie, J. 2008. Visible learning. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
- Heller, J. I. 2012. Effects of making sense of SCIENCETM professional development on the achievement of middle school students, including English language learners. (NCEE 2012-4002). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/west/pdf/REL_20124002.pdf.
- Hill, H. C., M. Beisiegel, and R. Jacob. 2013. Professional development research: Consensus, crossroads, and challenges. Educational Researcher 42 (9):476–87.
- Knight, D. 2012. Assessing the cost of instructional coaching. Journal of Education Finance 38 (1):52–80.
- Loucks-Horsley, S., K. E. Stiles, S. Mundry, N. Love, and P. W. Hewson. 2010. Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
- National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2007. Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2010. Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. 2016. What teachers should know and be able to do. 2nd ed. Arlington, VA: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. http://accomplishedteacher.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/NBPTS-What-Teachers-Should-Know-and-Be-Able-to-Do-.pdf.
- National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. Washington, DC: The National Commission on Excellence in Education.
- National Governors Association, the Council of Chief State School Officers, and Achieve, Inc. 2008. Benchmarking for success: Ensuring U.S. students receive a world-class education. Retrieved November 28, 2014 from http://www.edweek.org/media/benchmakring%20for%20success%20dec%202008%20final.pdf.
- NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Nieto, S. 2003. What keeps teachers going? New York: Teachers College Press.
- No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2002. 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 115, Stat. 1425.
- Peterson, A. 2016. Getting ‘What works’ working: Building blocks for the integration of experimental and improvement science. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 33 (3):299–313.
- Rivkin, S. G., E. A. Hanushek, and J. F. Kain. 2005. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica 73 (2):417–58.
- Rohanna, K. 2017. Breaking the “Adopt, Attack, Abandon” cycle: A case for improvement science in K-12 education. In Improvement science in evaluation: Methods and uses. New directions for evaluation, ed. C. A. Christie, M. Inkelas, and S. Lemire, vol. 153, 65–77. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Silva, E., and T. White. 2013. Pathways to improvement: Using psychological strategies to help college students master developmental math. http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/resources/publications/pathways-improvement-using-psychological-strategies-help-college-students-master-developmental-math/.
- Tooley, M., and K. Connally. 2016. No panacea: Diagnosing what ails teacher professional development before reaching for remedies. Washington, DC: New America. https://na-production.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/NA_NoPanaceaPaper7.7.pdf.
- Tyack, D., and L. Cuban. 1995. Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Wilson, S. 2011, May. Effective STEM teacher induction, preparation, and professional development. Paper presented at the Workshop on Successful STEM Education in K-12 Schools, Board on Science Education, Washington, DC.