Metacognition and Middle Grade Mathematics Teachers: Supporting Productive Struggle

References

• Atwll, N. 2015. In the middle: A lifetime of learning about writing, reading and adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., and C. Dweck. 2016. Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. 2004. Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher 33 (8):3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033008003.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI). 2010. Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EngageNY. 2018. Learning material. https://www.engageny.org/subject/math.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., and H. A. Simon. 1993. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. 1976. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In The nature of intelligence, ed. L. B. Resnick, 231–35. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34 (10):906–11. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, E. R. 2011. Metacognition: A literature review. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., and J. Bartlo. 2009. The role of tasks in promoting discourse supporting mathematical learning. In The role of mathematics discourse in producing leaders of discourse, ed. L. Knott, 77–98. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, C. 2006. The national writing project. Because writing matters. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2000. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2009. Focus in high school mathematics: Reasoning and sensemaking. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2014. Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematics success for all. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• National Middle School Association (NMSA). 2010. This we believe—essential attributes and characteristics of successful schools. http://www.amle.org/aboutamle/thiswebelieve/tabid/121/default.aspx#122516-the-16-characteristics.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, M. 2015. Productive struggle in mathematics. Interactive STEM. http://interactivestem.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/EDC-RPC-Brief-Productive-Struggle.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, A. M. 2007. The manifestation of critical thinking and metacognition in secondary American history students through implementation of lesson plans and activities consistent with historical thinking skills. PhD. diss., Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, B. E., and K. R. Leatham. 2009. Learning to use students' mathematical thinking to orchestrate a class discussion. In The role of mathematics discourse in producing leaders of discourse, ed. L. Knott, 99–128. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pólya, G. 1945. How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., and P. Afflerbach. 1995. Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocates.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalee, D. K. 2001. Writing, mathematics, and metacognition: Looking for connections through students’ work in mathematical problem solving. School Science and Mathematics 101 (5):236–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18026.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalee, D. K. 2005. Writing to develop mathematical understanding. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., and C. Artelt. 2010. Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Zdm 42 (2):149–61. doi: 10.1007/s11858-010-0240-2.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. 1992. Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, ed. D. A. Grouws, 334–370. New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. 1987. What's all the fuss about metacognition? In Cognitive science and mathematics education, ed. A. Schoenfeld, 189–215. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. S., and M. K. Stein. 2011. 5 Practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Sowder, J. 2007. The mathematical education and development of teachers. In Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, ed. F. Lester, 157–224. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., M. S. Smith, M. Henningsen, and E. Silver. 2000. Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, D. H., and L. M. Morrow. 2006. Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P., and J. McTighe. 2011. The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., and M. Conyers. 2016. Teaching students to drive their brains: Metacognitive strategies, activities, and lesson ideas. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar