Literacy across the Disciplines: Development and Validation of an Instrument to Assess Literacy Instruction in Middle and High School Classrooms

References

• Alvarez, R. M., and C. VanBeselaere. 2005. Web-based surveys. In Encyclopedia of social measurement, ed. K. Kempf-Leonard, 955–62. London: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1995. Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. 2nd ed. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., K. Jackson, E. Henrick, and T. Smith. 2018. Systems for instructional improvement: Creating coherence from the classroom to the district office. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D. 2003. Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation 12 (3):229–38. doi: 10.1023/a:1023254226592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, H., and S. Zemelman. 2014. Subjects matter: Exceeding standards through powerful content-area reading. 2nd ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbs, C. L., J. Ippolito, and M. Charner-Laird. 2016. Layering inter- mediate and disciplinary literacy work: Lessons learned from a sec- ondary social studies teacher team. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 60 (2):131–9. doi: 10.1002/jaal.547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs, C., J. Ippolito, and M. Charner-Laird. 2017. Investigating disciplinary literacy: A framework for collaborative professional learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyches, J. 2018. Investigating curricular injustices to uncover the injustices of curricula. The High School Journal 101 (4):236–50. doi: 10.1353/hsj.2018.0013.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., and M. J. Schleppegrell. 2010. Disciplinary literacies across content-areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 53 (7):587–97. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.53.7.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J. 2014. Survey research methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and M. Hebert. 2010. Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. New York: The Carnegie Corporation of New York and the Alliance for Excellence in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. A. 2012. Rewriting identities: Creating spaces for students and teachers to challenge the norms of what it means to be a reader in school. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 55 (5):368–73. doi: 10.1002/JAAL.00045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, S. N., D. Richard, and E. S. Kubany. 1995. Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment 7 (3):238–47. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, W. D., and L. Valli.. 1999. The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice127:150.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchman, K. A., and D. G. O’Brien. 2019. Disciplinary Literacy: From Infusion to Hybridity. Journal of Literacy Research 51 (4):525–36. doi: 10.1177/1086296X19876986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association and National Council of Teachers of English. 2017. Literacy teacher preparation [research advisory]. Newark, DE: International Literacy Association and National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• LaDuke, A., M. Lindner, and E. Yanoff. 2016. Content, disciplinary, and critical literacies in the C3 and Common Core. Social Studies Research & Practice 11 (3):96–111.
   Google Scholar
• Lent, R. C. 2016. This is disciplinary literacy: Reading, writing, thinking, and doing…content-area by content-area. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• Lent, R. C., and M. M. Voigt. 2019. Disciplinary literacy in action: How to create and sustain a school-wide culture of deep reading, writing, and thinking. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, J., B. Hussar, J. Zhang, X. Wang, K. Wang, S. Hein, M. Diliberti, E. F. Cataldi, F. B. Mann, and A. Barmer. 2019. The Condition of Education 2019 (NCES 2019-144). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019144.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mertler, C. A. 2009. Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. 2008. Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 52 (2):96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. 2015. Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Educational Review 85 (2):254–78. doi: 10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullens, J., and D. Kasprzyk. 1999. Validating item responses on self report teacher surveys: NCES working paper. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. 2008. Defining pedagogy. In Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities, eds. K. Hall, P. Murphy, and J. Soler, 28–39. London: SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies. 2013. C3 framework for social studies standards. Silver Spring.
   Google Scholar
• Ness, M. K. 2009. Reading comprehension strategies in secondary content-area classrooms: Teachers use of and attitudes towards reading comprehension instruction. Reading Horizons 49 (2):143–66.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, R., and W. S. Korr. 1996. A model for school social work facilitation of teacher self-efficacy and empowerment. Children & Schools 18 (1):45–51.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., and E. H. Hiebert. 2013. Understanding the common core state standards. In Teaching with the common core standards for English language arts PreK–2, 1–21. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Read to Succeed Act. 2014. South Carolina General Assembly: 120th Session, 2013-14. https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess120_2013-2014/prever/516_20140605a.htm
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, L. 2018. The missing mandate in read to succeed: Interpreting the reflection tool to explicitly support the implementation of culturally relevant pedagogy and the reading workshop model. In South Carolina Association for Middle Level Education Journal, 46. https://www.scamle.org/resources/Documents/2018%20Journal.pdf#page=47.
   Google Scholar
• Savitz, R. 2017. Secondary teachers' perspectives on response to intervention: A national study. University of Tennessee at Knoxville.
   Google Scholar
• Savitz, R. S., R. L. Allington, and J. Wilkins. 2019. Response to intervention: A summary of the guidance state departments of education provide to schools and school districts. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 91 (6): 243–249.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., and C. Shanahan. 2008. Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review 78 (1):40–59. doi: 10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spires, H. A., S. N. Kerkhoff, A. C. K. Graham, I. Thompson, and J. K. Lee. 2018. Operationalizing and validating disciplinary literacy in secondary education. Reading and Writing 31 (6):1401–34. doi: 10.1007/s11145-018-9839-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program. 2017. U. S. Department of Education. SCRL comprehensive literacy plans prepared by states, BIE and outlying areas. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/strivingreaders-literacy/literacyprofiles.html
   Google Scholar
• Warnecke, R. B., T. P. Johnson, N. Chavez, S. Sudman, D. P. O'rourke, L. Lacey, and J. Horm. 1997. Improving question wording in surveys of culturally diverse populations. Annals of Epidemiology 7 (5):334–42. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(97)00030-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsey, T. D. V., D. Lapp, M. C. Grant, and I. M. Karkouti. 2019. Intersections of literacy and teaching in the disciplines. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 63 (3):251–6. doi: 10.1002/jaal.985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar