Examination of Genre-based Strategy Instruction in Middle School English Language Arts and Science

References

• Ball, D. L., and D. K. Cohen. 1999. Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice, ed. G. Sykes and L. Darling-Hammond, 3–32.  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G., A. S. Bryk, and E. R. Dexter. 2010. Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. Elementary School Journal 111(1):7–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. 1992. Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of Learning Sciences 2 (2):141–178. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., T. E. Raphael, L. M. Anderson, H. M. Anthony, and D. D. Stevens. 1991. Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal 28 (2):337–72. doi: 10.3102/00028312028002337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. 2009. Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher 38: 181–199. doi: 10.3102/0013189X08331140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., and P. D. Pearson. 2009. Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal of Education 189 (1-2):107–22. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/42748663. doi: 10.1177/0022057409189001-208.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. 2009. Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, R., and S. Graham. 2019. Argumentative writing: Theory, assessment, and instruction. Reading and Writing 32 (6):1345–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09950-x. doi: 10.1007/s11145-019-09950-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, R. P., and W. E. Lewis. 2019. Knowledge of persuasion and writing goals predict the quality of children’s persuasive writing. Reading and Writing 32 (6):1411–30. doi: 10.1007/s11145-018-9918-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukkink, R. G., N. Trienekens, and L. J. C. Kramer. 2011. Video feedback in education and training: Putting learning in the picture. Educational Psychology Review 23 (1):45–63. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9144-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J., and S. Graham. 2010. Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4 to 6: A national survey. The Elementary School Journal 110 (4):494–518. doi: 10.1086/651193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A., and S. Graham. 2014. A meta-analysis of writing interventions for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children 80 (4):454–73. doi: 10.1177/0014402914527238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2006. Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A metaanalysis. In Handbook of writing research, ed. C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, and J. Fitzgerald, 187–207. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., and S. Graham. 2009. Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Premises, evolution, and the future. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II 6 (1): 113–135.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., and D. Rose. 2012. Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D. 1986. Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing ability. Journal of Memory and Language 25 (4):431–44. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90036-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgette, E., and P. Haria. 2016. The effects of comprehensive text structure strategy instruction on eighth graders’ ability to revise persuasive essays. Reading Psychology 37 (7):1043–75. doi: 10.1080/02702711.2016.1159631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2012. The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012-470). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nippold, M., J. Ward-Lonergan, and J. Fanning. 2005. Persuasive writing in children, adolescents, and adults: A study of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic development. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 36 (2):125–38. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2005/012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A. in press. Reading and writing integration. In Principles of Effective literacy instruction, edited by S. Parsons and M. Vaughn, XX-XX. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. 2018. Using a task analysis process for reading and writing assignments. The Reading Teacher 72 (1):107–14. doi: 10.1002/trtr.1690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., and C. A. MacArthur. 2016. The effects of giving feedback on the persuasive writing of fourth- and fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly 51 (4):419–33. doi: 10.1002/rrq.149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A. 2020. A yearlong, professional development model on genre-based strategy instruction on writing. The Journal of Educational Research 113 (3):177–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1767531. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2020.1767531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., and C. A. MacArthur. (in press). Design Based Research in English Language Arts. In Design Based Research in Education, edited by Zoi A. Traga Philippakos, Antony Pellegrino, and Emily Howell, XX-XX. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., and C. A. MacArthur. 2020a. Integrating collaborative reasoning and strategy instruction to improve second graders’ opinion writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly 36 (4):379–95. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2019.1650315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., and C. A. MacArthur. 2020b. Developing strategic, young writers through genre instruction: Resources for grades K-2. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philippakos, Z. A., C. A. MacArthur, and D. L. Coker. 2015. Developing strategic writers through genre instruction: Resources for grades 3–5. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinking, D., and B. A. Bradley. 2008. On formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., R. Anderson, B. McNurlen, K. Nguyen-Jahiel, A. Archodidou, and S.-Y. Kim. 2001. Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes 32 (2):155–75. doi: 10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troia, G. A., and S. Graham. 2016. Common core writing and language standards and aligned state assessments: A national survey of teacher beliefs and attitudes. Reading & Writing 29 (9): 1719–1743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, R., C. Manly, S. Kommers, and E. Kimball. 2019. Narrowed gaps and persistent challenges: Examining rural-nonrural disparities in postsecondary outcomes over time. American Journal of Education 126 (1):1–31. doi: 10.1086/705498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. 2011. Argumentation across the curriculum. Written Communication 28 (2): 193–219. doi: 10.1177/0741088311399236.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, S. S. 1998. Empowering education: Teaching argumentative writing to cultural minority middle-school students. Research in the Teaching of English 33: 49–83.
   Google Scholar