References
- Aschbacher, P. R., M. Ing, and S. M. Tsai. 2014. Is science me? Exploring middle school students’ STE-M career aspirations. Journal of Science Education and Technology 23 (6):735–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9504-x.
- Aschbacher, P. R., E. Li, and E. J. Roth. 2010. Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (5):564–82.
- Berryman, S. E. 1983. Who will do science? Trends and their causes in minority and female representation among holders of advanced degrees in science and mathematics. A special report. New York: Rockefeller Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED245052.pdf.
- Brotman, J. S., and F. M. Moore. 2008. Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (9):971–1002. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20241.
- Brown, P. L., J. P. Concannon, D. Marx, C. W. Donaldson, and A. Black. 2016. An examination of middle grades students’ STEM self-efficacy with relation to interest and perceptions of STEM. Journal of STEM Education 17 (3):38.
- Bryk, A., and B. Schneider. 2002. Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Bryk, A., P. Sebring, E. Allensworth, S. Suppescu, and J. Easton. 2010. Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
- Catsambis, S. 1995. Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32 (3):243–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320305.
- Christensen, R., G. Knezek, and T. Tyler-Wood. 2015. Alignment of hands-on stem engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology 24 (6):898–909. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9572-6.
- Cohen, D. K., and H. C. Hill. 2000. Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record 102 (2):294–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00057.
- Cohen, D. K., and H. C. Hill. 2001. Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Cohen, D. K., S. W. Raudenbush, and D. L. Ball. 2003. Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 25 (2):119–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002119.
- Craig, C. J., R. Verma, D. Stokes, P. Evans, and B. Abrol. 2018. The influence of parents on undergraduate and graduate students’ entering the STEM disciplines and STEM careers. International Journal of Science Education 40 (6):621–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1431853.
- Dare, E. A., and G. H. Roehrig. 2016. “If I had to do it, then I would”: Understanding early middle school students’ perceptions of physics and physics-related careers by gender. Physical Review Physics Education Research 12 (2):1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020117.
- Du, W., D. Liu, C. C. Johnson, T. A. Sondergeld, V. L. Bolshakova, and T. J. Moore. 2019. The impact of integrated STEM professional development on teacher quality. School Science and Mathematics 119 (2):105–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12318.
- Ertmer, P. A., A. T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, O. Sadik, E. Sendurur, and P. Sendurur. 2012. Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education 59 (2):423–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.
- Gardner, K., D. Glassmeyer, and R. Worthy. 2019. Impacts of STEM professional development on teachers’ knowledge, self-efficacy, and practice. Frontiers in Education 4 (26):1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00026.
- Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
- Hansen, M., and T. Gonzalez. 2014. Investigating the relationship between stem learning principles and student achievement in math and science. American Journal of Education 120 (2):139–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/674376.
- Hanson, S. 1996. Lost talent: Women in the sciences. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Hibbeln, C. 2020. Mastering the master schedule. Educational Leadership 77 (9):36–40.
- Ing, M., and K. Nylund-Gibson. 2017. The importance of early attitudes toward mathematics and science. Teachers College Record 119:1–32.
- Kim, H. 2016. Inquiry-based science and technology enrichment program for middle school-aged female students. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (2):174–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9584-2.
- Kim, C., M. K. Kim, C. Lee, J. M. Spector, and K. DeMeester. 2013. Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education 29:76–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005.
- Li, M., P. A. Pérez-Diaz, Y. Mao, and K. V. Petrides. 2018. A multilevel model of teachers’ job performance: Understanding the effects of trait emotional intelligence, job satisfaction, and organizational trust. Frontiers in Psychology 9:2420–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02420.
- Loewenthal, K. M. 2001. An introduction to psychological tests and scales. 2nd ed. London: Psychology Press.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Science teachers’ learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. 2012. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Nugent, G., B. Barker, G. Welch, N. Grandgenett, C. Wu, and C. Nelson. 2015. A model of factors contributing to stem learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education 37 (7):1067–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863.
- Oakes, J. 1990. Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics. Review of Research in Education 16:153–222.
- Riegle-Crumb, C., C. Moore, and A. Ramos-Wada. 2011. Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education 95 (3):458–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20431.
- Rowan, B., R. Corenti, R. Miller, and E. Camburn. 2009. School improvement by design: Lessons from a study of comprehensive school reform programs. CPRE Research Reports, Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/54
- Sass, T. R. 2015. Understanding the STEM pipeline. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (Working Paper No. 125). https://caldercenter.org/sites/default/files/WP%20125.pdf
- Sawyer, L. M. 2017. Perceptions and practice: The relationship between teacher perceptions of technology use and level of classroom technology integration. Unpublished PhD diss. Southeastern University.
- Suarez, M. I., and K. B. Wright. 2019. Investigating school climate and school leadership factors that impact secondary STEM teacher retention. Journal for STEM Education Research 2 (1):55–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00012-z.
- Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. 2003. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Texas Workforce Investment Council. 2015, December. Defining middle-skill science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) occupations in Texas. https://gov.texas.gov/uploads/files/organization/twic/Middle-Skill_STEM_Occupations_in_TX.pdf
- Ufnar, J. A., and V. L. Shepherd. 2019. The Scientist in the Classroom Partnership Program: An innovative teacher professional development model. Professional Development in Education 45 (4):642–58.
- Weis, A. M., and E. R. Banilower. 2014, April. 2012 National survey of science and mathematics education: Public release datasets user manual. San Jose, CA: Horizon Research, Inc.
- Wilson, S. M. 2011, May. Effective STEM teacher induction, preparation, and professional development. Paper presented at the Workshop on Successful STEM Education in K-12 Schools, Board on Science Education, Washington, D.C.
- Wright, K. B., M. Banerjee, and H. C. Waxman. 2021. Predictors of elementary STEM teachers’ perceptions of instructional preparedness, instructional objectives, and instructional practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Virtual conference.