References
- Abdelfattah, F. 2010. The relationship between motivation and achievement in low-stakes examinations. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 38 (2):159–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2010.38.2.159.
- Ackerman, P. L., and R. Kanfer. 2009. Test length and cognitive fatigue: An empirical examination of effects on performance and test-taker reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15 (2):163–181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015719.
- Alitto, J. M., C. Malecki, S. Coyle, and A. Santuzzi. 2016. Examining the effects of adult and peer mediated goal setting and feedback interventions for writing: Two studies. Journal of School Psychology 56:89–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.03.002.
- Alter, P., and T. Haydon. 2017. Characteristics of effective classroom rules: A review of the literature. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children 40 (2):114–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417700962.
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, and Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.). 2014. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
- Ashcraft, M. H., and E. P. Kirk. 2001. The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (2):224–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.224.
- Barry, C., J. Horst, S. Finney, A. Brown, and J. Kopp. 2010. Do examinees have similar test taking effort? A high-stakes question for low-stakes testing. International Journal of Testing 10 (4):342–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2010.508569.
- Bolt, S. E., and R. L. Quenemoen. 2006. The growing demand for expertise in assessment and diverse learners to inform the implementation of large-scale accountability systems. Assessment for Effective Intervention 31 (4):49–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/073724770603100404.
- Bouck, E. C., M. K. Bouck, and M. Hunley. 2015. The calculator effect: Understanding the impact of calculators as accommodations for secondary students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology 30 (2):77–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643415617371.
- Bridgeman, B., A. Harvey, and J. Braswell. 1995. Effects of calculator use on scores on a test of mathematical reasoning. Journal of Educational Measurement 32 (4):323–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1995.tb00470.x.
- Buzick, H, and E. Stone. 2014. A Meta-Analysis of Research on the Read Aloud Accommodation. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 33 (3):17–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12040.
- Cassady, J. C. 2004. The influence of cognitive test anxiety across the learning-testing cycle. Learning and Instruction 14 (6):569–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.09.002.
- Center for Applied Special Technology. 2018. Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org.
- Council of the Great City Schools. 2015. Student testing in America’s great city schools: An inventory and preliminary analysis. https://www.cgcs.org/cms/lib/DC00001581/Centricity/Domain/87/Testing%20Report.pdf.
- Crawford, L., and L. R. Ketterlin-Geller. 2013. Middle school teachers’ assignment of test accommodations. The Teacher Educator 48 (1):29–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2012.740152.
- Dodeen, H. 2015. Teaching test-taking strategies: Importance and techniques. Psychological Research 5 (2):108–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5542/2015.02.003.
- Elliott, S. N., T. R. Kratochwill, B. C. McKevitt, and C. K. Malecki. 2009. The effects and perceived consequences of testing accommodations on math and science performance assessments. School Psychology Quarterly 24 (4):224–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018000.
- Epton, T., S. Currie, and C. Armitage. 2017. Unique effects of setting goals on behavior change: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 85 (12):1182–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000260.
- Ergene, T. 2003. Effective interventions on test anxiety reduction. School Psychology International 24 (3):313–28. Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, 20 U.S. Code §1005 et seq. (2015). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343030243004.
- Eysenck, M. W., and M. G. Calvo. 1992. Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion 6 (6):409–434. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696.
- Finney, S., D. Sundre, M. Swain, and L. Williams. 2016. The validity of value-added estimates from low-stakes testing contexts: The impact of change in test-taking motivation and test consequences. Educational Assessment 21 (1):60–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1127753.
- Fuchs, L. S., D. Fuchs, S. B. Eaton, C. Hamlett, E. Binkley, and R. Crouch. 2000a. Using objective data sources to enhance teacher judgments about test accommodations. Exceptional Children 67 (1):67–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006700105.
- Fuchs, L. S., D. Fuchs, S. Eaton, C. L. Hamlett, and K. Karns. 2000b. Supplementing teacher judgment of math test accommodations using objective data sources. School Psychology Review 29 (1):65–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2000.12085998.
- Gregg, N., and J. Nelson. 2012. Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of extra time as a test accommodation for transitioning adolescents with learning disabilities: More questions than answers. Journal of Learning Disabilities 45 (2):128–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355484.
- Infantes-Paniagua, Á., A. F. Silva, R. Ramirez-Campillo, H. Sarmento, F. T. González-Fernández, S. González-Víllora, and F. M. Clemente. 2021. Active school breaks and students’ attention: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Brain Sciences 11 (6):675. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11060675.
- Jensen, N., A. Rice, and J. Soland. 2018. The influence of rapidly guessed item responses on teacher value-added estimates: Implications for policy and practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 40 (2):267–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718759600.
- Kettler, R. J., S. N. Elliott, P. A. Beddow, and A. Kurz. 2018. Accessible instruction and testing today. In Handbook of accessible instruction and testing practices, ed. S. Elliott, R. Kettler, P. Beddow, and A. Kurz. Cham: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71126-3_1.
- Liddle, E., C. Hollis, M. Batty, M. Groom, J. Totman, M. Liotti, G. Scerif, and P. Liddle. 2011. Task-related default mode network modulation and inhibitory control in ADHD: Effects of motivation and methylphenidate. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 52 (7):761–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02333.x.
- Lindstrom, J. H., and N. Gregg. 2007. The role of extended time on the SAT for students with learning disabilities and/or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 22 (2):85–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00233.x.
- Los, J., S. Witmer, and C. Roseth. 2020. Exploring motivational factors associated with test taking effort among middle school students. School Psychology Review:1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1832862.
- Lovett, B. J. 2020. Extended time testing accommodations for students with disabilities: Impact on score meaning and construct representation. In Integrating timing considerations to improve testing practices, ed. M. Margolis and R. Feinberg, 48–58. New York: Routledge.
- Lovett, B., L. Lewandowski, and L. Carter. 2019. Separate room testing accommodations for students with and without ADHD. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 37 (7):852–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918801420.
- Lovett, B., and J. Nelson. 2021. Systematic review: Educational accommodations for children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 60 (4):448–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.07.891.
- McDonald, A. 2001. The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology 21 (1):89–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410020019867.
- McKevitt, B. C., and S. N. Elliott. 2003. Effects and perceived consequences of using read aloud and teacher-recommended testing accommodations on a reading achievement test. School Psychology Review 32 (4):583–600. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2003.12086222.
- Neal, D. 1981. The data-based instructional procedures of precision teaching. Educational Psychology 1 (4):289–304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341810010402.
- Ofiesh, N., E. Moniz, and J. Bisagno. 2015. Voices of university students with ADHD about test-taking: Behaviors, needs, and strategies. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability 28:109–20.
- Paul, G., B. Elam, and S. Verhulst. 2007. A longitudinal study of students’ perceptions of using deep breathing meditation to reduce testing stresses. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 19 (3):287–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10401330701366754.
- Pedersen, S. L., T. M. Kennedy, H. M. Joseph, S. J. Riston, H. L. Kipp, and B. S. G. Molina. 2020. Read-world changes in adolescents’ ADHD symptoms within the day and across school and non-school days. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 48 (12):1543–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00695-8.
- Putwain, D. 2008. Do examinations stakes moderate the test anxiety-examination performance relationship? Educational Psychology 28 (2):109–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701452264.
- Pyle, K., and G. Fabiano. 2017. Daily report card intervention and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis of single-case studies. Exceptional Children 83 (4):378–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917706370.
- Rafferty, L. A. 2010. Step-by-step: Teaching students to self-monitor. Teaching Exceptional Children 43 (2):50–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991004300205.
- Rieke, R., S. S. Lazarus, M. L. Thurlow, and L. M. Dominguez. 2013. 2012 survey of states: Successes and challenges during a time of change. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
- Rios, J. 2021. Improving test-taking effort in low-stakes group-based educational testing: A meta-analysis of interventions. Applied Measurement in Education 34 (2):85–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2021.1890741.
- Rose, D., and A. Meyer. 2000. The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform (ED451624). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED451624.pdf.
- Salvia, J., & J. Ysseldyke, and S. Witmer. 2017. Assessment in special and inclusive education. 13th ed. New York: Cengage.
- Segool, N. K., J. S. Carlson, A. N. Goforth, N. Von der Embse, and J. A. Barterian. 2013. Heightened test anxiety among young children: Elementary school students’ anxious responses to high-stakes testing. Psychology in the Schools 50 (5):489–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21689.
- Shyyan, V. V., M. L. Thurlow, E. D. Larson, L. L. Christensen, and S. S. Lazarus. 2016. White paper on common accessibility language for states and assessment vendors. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Data Informed Accessibility—Making Optimal Needs-based Decisions (DIAMOND). https://nceo.umn.edu/docs/OnlinePubs/DIAMONDWhitePaper.pdf.
- Simonsen, B., S. Fairbanks, A. Briesch, D. Myers, and G. Sugai. 2008. Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children 31:351–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.007.
- Smith, G. W., and P. J. Riccomini. 2013. The effect of a noise reducing test accommodation on elementary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 28 (2):89–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12010.
- Thurlow, M., and S. Bolt. 2001. Empirical support for accommodations most often allowed in state policy (Synthesis Report 41). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota National Center on Educational Outcomes.
- Thurlow, M. L., S. S. Lazarus, D. Albus, and J. Hodgson. 2010. Computer-based testing: Practices and considerations (Synthesis Report 78). Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota.
- von der Embse, N. P., and S. E. Witmer. 2014. High-stakes accountability: Student anxiety and large-scale testing. Journal of Applied School Psychology 30 (2):132–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2014.888529.
- Wise, S. L., and C. E. DeMars. 2005. Low examinee effort in low-stakes assessment: Problems and potential solutions. Educational Assessment 10 (1):1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1001_1.
- Wise, S. L., and C. E. DeMars. 2010. Examinee noneffort and the validity of program assessment results. Educational Assessment 15 (1):27–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10627191003673216.
- Wise, S., M. Kuhfeld, and J. Soland. 2019. The impact of proctor notification when students disengage. Portland, OR: NWEA Collaborative on Growth.
- Wise, S. L., and L. F. Smith. 2011. A model of examinee test-taking effort. In High-stakes testing in education: Science and practice in K–12 settings, ed. J. A. Bovaird, K. F. Geisinger, & C. W. Buckendahl, 139–53. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Wolf, L. F., and J. K. Smith. 1995. The consequence of a consequence: Motivation, anxiety, and test performance. Applied Measurement in Education 8 (3):227–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0803_3.
- Wolfe, K., D. Pyle, C. Charlton, C. Sabey, E. Lund, and S. Ross. 2016. A systematic review of the empirical support for check-in check-out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 18 (2):74–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715595957.
- Zilberberg, A., A. R. Brown, J. C. Harmes, and R. D. Anderson. 2009. How can we increase student motivation during low-stakes testing? Understanding the student perspective. In Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning, eds. D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown and G. A. D. Liem, 255–277. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.