The Use of Cooperative Learning to Develop Reasoning Skills on Socioscientific Issues

References

• Akcay, B. 2009. The case of nuclear energy in Turkey: From chernobyl to akkuyu nuclear power plant. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 4 (4):347–55. doi: 10.1080/15567240701621182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, F. H. 1924. Social psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E., N. Blaney, J. Sikes, G. Stephan, and M. Snapp. 1978. The Jigsaw Classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut, S., and S. Karlıdağ. 2018. Nuclear energy discourse in Turkish media. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 73 (3):891–911.
   Google Scholar
• Cansız, M., and N. Cansız. 2016. Artvin citizens’ reasoning about a local environmental issue: Cerattepe. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 7 (3):88–93.
   Google Scholar
• Eggert, S., F. Ostermeyer, M. Hasselhorn, and S. Bögeholz. 2013. Socioscientific decision making in the science classroom: The effect of embedded metacognitive instructions on students’ learning outcomes. Education Research International 2013:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2013/309894.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. 2013. The sciences of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (supplement_3):14033–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213273110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M., and A. F. Ashman. 2003. An historical review of the use of groups to promote socialization and learning. In Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups, ed. R. M. Gillies and A. F. Ashman, 1–18. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, M. 2009. Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting. International Journal of Science Education 31 (4):551–70. doi: 10.1080/09500690701744595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocakusak, A. 2016. Did Chernobyl accident contribute to the rise of thyroid cancer in Turkey? Acta Endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania: 2005) 12 (3):362–7. doi: 10.4183/aeb.2016.362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., and R. Johnson. 1985. The internal dynamics of cooperative learning groups. In Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn, ed. R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb and R. Schmuck, 103–24. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ogan-Bekiroglu, F., and H. Eskin. 2012. Examination of the relationship between engagement in scientific argumentation and conceptual knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10 (6):1415–43. doi: 10.1007/s10763-012-9346-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M. 1997. Student decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education 19 (2):167–82. doi: 10.1080/0950069970190203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokni, M., V. Ghasemi, and Z. Tavakoli. 2020. Immune responses and pathogenesis of SARS‐CoV‐2 during an outbreak in Iran: Comparison with SARS and MERS. Reviews in Medical Virology 30 (3):e2107. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., and M. L. Klosterman. 2009. Exploring the sociopolitical dimensions of global warming. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 45 (4):9–13. doi: 10.3200/SATS.45.4.9-13.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2003. Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: The influence of morality and content knowledge. Unpublished doctoral diss., University of South Florida, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., and D. L. Zeidler. 2005. Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (1):112–38. doi: 10.1002/tea.20042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., P. Friedrichsen, L. Zangori, and L. Ke. 2020. Technology-supported professional development for collaborative design of COVID-19 instructional materials. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 28 (2):171–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sharan, S. 1980. Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research 50 (2):241–71. doi: 10.3102/00346543050002241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. 1932. A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. The American Journal of Psychology 44 (3):491–504. doi: 10.2307/1415351.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. 1989. Cooperative learning and student achievement. In School and classroom organization, ed. R. E. Slavin, 129–31. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., J. Flynn, C. K. Mertz, M. Poumadere, and C. Mays. 2000. Nuclear power and the public. In Cross-cultural risk perception, ed. O. Renn and B. Rohrmann, 55–102. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., J. A. Torsiglieri, R. Keith Esch, and J. D. Pasley. 2017. When ‘we wish they knew’ meets ‘I want to know’. International Journal of Science Education 39 (13):1830–45. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1353714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, G. 1928. Do groups think more efficiently than individuals. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 23 (3):328–36. doi: 10.1037/h0072661.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar