Large Eddy Simulation of Mild Combustion Using PDF-Based Turbulence–Chemistry Interaction Models

REFERENCES

• Aminian, J., Galletti, C., Shahhosseini, S., and Tognotti, L. 2012. Numerical investigation of a MILD combustion burner: Analysis of mixing field, chemical kinetics and turbulence chemistry-interaction. Flow Turbulence Combust., 88, 597–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSYS Fluent 13.0. 2010, November. Ansys Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA (www.ansys.com).
   Google Scholar
• Cao, R.R., Pope, S.B., and Masri, A.R. 2005. Turbulent lifted flames in a vitiated co-flow investigated using joint PDF calculations. Combust. Flame, 142, 438–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, R.R., Wang, H., and Pope, S.B. 2007. The effect of mixing models in PDF calculations of piloted jet flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 31, 1543–1550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabra, R., Chen, J.Y., Dibble, R.W., Karpetis, A.N., and Barlow, R.S. 2005. Lifted methane-air jet flames in a vitiated coflow. Combust. Flame, 143, 491–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabra, R., Myhrvold, T., Chen, J.-Y., Dibble, R.W., Karpetis, A.N., and Barlow, R.W. 2002. Simultaneous laser Raman-Rayleigh-Lif measurements and numerical modelling results of a lifted turbulent H2/N2 jet flame in a vitiated coflow. Proc. Combust. Inst., 29, 1881–1888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaliere, A., and de Joannon, M. 2004. Mild combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 30, 329–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, I., Cehreli, Z., and Yavuz, I. 2005. Index of resolution quality for large eddy simulation.J. Fluids Eng., 127, 949–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christo, F.C., and Dally, B.B. 2004. Application of transport pdf approach for modelling mild combustion. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Australian Fluid Mechanic Conference, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, December 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Christo, F.C., and Dally, B.B. 2005. Modelling turbulent reacting jets issuing into a hot and diluted coflow. Combust. Flame, 142, 117–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, P.J., and Peters, N. 2001. Numerical simulation of a MILD combustion burner. Combust. Flame, 124, 503–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dally, B., Karpetis, A., and Barlow, R.S. 2002. Structure of turbulent non-premixed jet flames in a diluted hot coflow. Proc. Combust. Inst., 29, 1147–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De., A., Dongre, A., and Yadav, R. 2013. Numerical investigation of Delft-jet-in-hot-coflow (DJHC) burner using probability density function (PDF) transport modelling. Paper No. GT2013-95390. ASME Turbo Expo, San-Antonio, TX, June 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• De., A., Oldenhof, E., Sathiah, P., and Roekaerts, D. 2011. Numerical simulation of Delft-jet-in-hot-coflow (DJHC) flames using the eddy dissipation concept model for turbulence–chemistry interaction. Flow Turbulence Combust., 87, 1386–6184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingo, P., Vervisch, L., and Veynante, D. 2008. Large-eddy simulation of a lifted methane jet flame in a vitiated coflow. Combust. Flame, 152, 415–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopazo, C., and O’Brien, E.E. 1974. Functional formulation of non-isothermal turbulent reactive flows. Phys. Fluids, 17, 1968–1975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, R.O. 2003. Computational Models for Turbulent Reacting Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., and Cabot, W.H. 1991. A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids, A3, 1760–1765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth, D.C. 2010. Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 36, 168–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze, J.O. 1975. Turbulence, McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ihme, M., and See, Y.C. 2011. LES flamelet modelling of a three-stream MILD combustor: Analysis of flame sensitivity to scalar inflow conditions. Proc. Combust. Inst., 33, 1309–1317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihme, M., Zhand, J., He, G., and Dally, B. 2012. Large-eddy simulation of a jet-in-hot-coflow burner operating in the oxygen-diluted combustion regime. Flow Turbulence Combust., 89, 449–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, S., Anand, M.S., Razdan, M.K., and Pope, S.B. 1999. In situ detailed chemistry calculations in combustor flow analyses. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 123, 747–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janicka, J., Kolbe, W., and Kollmann, W. 1979. Closure of the transport equation for the probability density function of turbulent scalar fields. J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn., 4, 47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, J., and Hussain, F. 1995. On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech., 285, 69–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.H., Huh, K.Y., and Dally, B.B. 2005. Conditional moment closure modelling of turbulent non-premixed combustion in diluted hot coflow. Proc. Combust. Inst., 30, 751–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, W.W., and Menon, S. 1997. Application of the localized dynamic subgrid-scale model to turbulent wall-bounded flows. Technical report AIAA-97-0210. 35th Aerosapce Science Meeting, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reno, NV, January 6–10
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, R.M., and Polifke, W. 2013. LES of Delft-jet-in-hot-coflow (DJHC) with tabulated chemistry and stochastic fields combustion models. Fuel Process. Technol., 107, 138–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenhof, E., Tummers, M.J., van Veen, E.H., and Roekaerts, D.J.E.M. 2010. Ignition kernel formation and lift-off behaviour of jet-in-hot-coflow flames. Combust. Flame, 157, 1167–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenhof, E., Tummers, M.J., van Veen, E.H., and Roekaerts, D.J.E.M. 2011. Role of entrainment in the stabilisation of jet-in-hot-coflow flames. Combust. Flame, 158, 1553–1563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenhof, E., Tummers, M.J., van Veen, E.H., and Roekaerts, D.J.E.M. 2013. Conditional flow field statistics of jet-in-hot-coflow flames. Combust. Flame, 160, 1428–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plessing, T., Peters N., and Wünning, J.G. 1998. Twenty-Seventh Symposium (Int.) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 3197–3204.
   Google Scholar
• Poinsot, T., and Veynante, D. 2005. Theoretical and Numerical Combustion, 2nd Edition, R.T. Edwards, Incorporated, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B. 1985. PDF methods for turbulent reacting flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 11, 119–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B. 1997. Computationally efficient implementation of combustion chemistry using in situ adaptive tabulation. Combust. Theor. Model., 1, 41–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B. 2000. Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B., and Wang, H. 2008. Lagrangian investigation of local extinction, re-ignition and auto-ignition in turbulent flames. Combust. Theor. Model., 12, 857–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagaut, P. 2006. Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows, An Introduction, 3rd Edition, Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, J. 1963. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev., 91, 99–164.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, S., and Pope, S.B. 1998. A mixing model for turbulent reacting flows based on Euclidean minimum spanning trees. Combust. Flame, 115, 487–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wünning, J.A., and Wünning, J.G. 1997. Flameless oxidation to reduce thermal NO-formation. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 23, 81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, R., Kushari, A., Eswaran, V., and Verma, A.K. 2013. A numerical investigation of the Eulerian PDF transport approach for modeling of turbulent non-premixed pilot stabilized flames. Combust. Flame, 160, 618–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar