Eulerian–Lagrangian RANS Model Simulations of the NIST Turbulent Methanol Spray Flame

REFERENCES

• Binniger, B., Chan, M., Paczkko, G., and Herrmann, M. 1998. Numerical simulation of turbulent partially premixed hydrogen flames with the flamelet model. Technical Report. Advanced Combustion Gmbh, Internal Report.
   Google Scholar
• Collazo J., Porteiro, J., Patiño, D., Miguez, J.L., Granada, E. and Moran, J. 2009. Simulation and experimental validation of a methanol burner. Fuel, 88, 326–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, D.S., Widmann, J.F., and Presser, C. 2001. CFD modeling and comparison with data from the NIST reference spray combustor. Presented at the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New York, November 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• De Jager, B. 2008. Combustion and noise phenomena in turbulent alkane flames. PhD thesis. Twente University, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Dombrowski, N., and Hooper, P.C. 1962. The effect of ambient density or drop formation in sprays. Chem. Eng. Sci., 17, 291–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Düwel, I., Ge, H.-W., Kronemayer, H., Dibble, R., Gutheil, E., Schulz, C., and Wolfrum, J. 2007. Experimental and numerical characterization of a turbulent spray flame. Proc. Combust. Inst., 31, 2247–2255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Z., Perrish, S., Farrell, P.V., and Reitz, R.D. 1997. Modeling atomization processes of pressure-swirl hollow-cone fuel sprays. Atomization Sprays, 7, 663–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollmann, C., and Gutheil, E. 1996. Modeling of turbulent spray diffusion flames including detailed chemistry. Symp. (Int.) Combust., 26, 1731–1738.
   Google Scholar
• Jenny, P., Roekaerts, D., and Beishuizen, N. 2012. Modeling of turbulent dilute spray combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 38, 846–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kader, B. 1981. Temperature and concentration profiles in fully turbulent boundary layers. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 24, 1541–1544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpetis, A., and Gomez, A. 2000. An experimental study of well-defined turbulent nonpremixed spray flames. Combust. Flame, 121, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, A.H. 1989. Atomization and Sprays. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, P., and Chen, J.Y. 2010. International workshop on measurement and computation of turbulent nonpremixed flames. Available at: http://www.sandia.gov/TNF/chemistry.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, R.P., and Meyer, M.P. 2002. A dimensionally reduced reaction mechanism for methanol oxidation. Proc. Combust. Inst., 29, 1395–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen, B.F. 1981. On the structure of turbulence and a generalized eddy dissipation concept for chemical reaction in turbulent flow. In Proceedings of the 19th AIAA Meeting, St. Louis, MO, January 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• McDonell, V.G., and Samuelsen, G.S. 1995. An experimental database for the computational fluid dynamics of reacting and nonreacting methanol sprays. J. Fluids Eng., 117, 145–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, C.M., Breitbach, H., and Peters, N. 1994. Partially premixed turbulent flame propagation in jet flames. Symp. (Int.) Combust., 25(1), 1099–1106.
   Google Scholar
• NIST. 2010. Materials measurement laboratory. Gaithersburg, Maryland. U. Benchmark spray combustion database. Available at: http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/spray-combust.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, P.J. 1981. Collective drop effects on vaporizing liquid sprays. PhD thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, P.J., and Amsden, A.A. 1987. The TAB method for numerical calculation of spray droplet breakup. SAE Paper 872089.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, M.A., and Reitz, R.D. 1998. Modeling the effects of fuel spray characteristics on diesel engine combustion and emission. SAE Paper 980131.
   Google Scholar
• Presser, C. 2006. Application of a benchmark experimental database for multiphase combustion modelling. J. Propuls. Power, 22, 1145–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranz, W.E., and Marshall, Jr., W.R. 1952a. Evaporation from drops, Part I. Chem. Eng. Prog., 48, 141–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranz, W.E., and Marshall, Jr., W.R. 1952b. Evaporation from drops, Part II. Chem. Eng. Prog., 48, 173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitz, R.D. 1987. Modeling atomization processes in high-pressure vaporizing sprays. Atomization Sprays, 3, 309–337.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D.P., Corradini, M.L., and Rutland, C.J. 1999a. A two-dimensional, non-equilibrium model of flashing nozzle flow. In Proceedings of the 3rd ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, San Francisco, July 18–23; ASME, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D.P., Nouar, I., Senecal, P.K., Rutland, C.J., Martin, J.K., and Reitz, R.D. 1999b. Pressure-swirl atomization in the near field. SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0496.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G.I. 1963. The shape and acceleration of a drop in a high speed air stream. Technical Report. In the Scientific Papers of G. I. Taylor, ed., G. K. Batchelor.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. 1931. Zum Zerfall eines Flüssigkeitsstrahles. ZAMM, 11, 136–154.
   Google Scholar
• Widmann, J.F., and Presser, C. 2002. A benchmark experimental database for multiphase combustion model input and validation. Combust Flame, 129, 47–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, W., and Blasiak, W. 2005. Numerical study of fuel temperature influence on single gas jet combustion in highly preheated and oxygen deficient air. Energy, 30, 385–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, S., Roekaerts, D., and van der Meer, T. 2011. Numerical simulation of a turbulent methanol spray flame using the Eulerian–Lagrangian method and the steady laminar flamelet model. In Proceedings of the 7th Mediterranean Combustion Symposium, Sardinia, Italy, September 11–15; ID: PEC-4.
   Google Scholar