Optimization of Activated Carbon Monolith Co₃O₄-Based Catalyst for Simultaneous SO₂/NO_x Removal from Flue Gas Using Response Surface Methodology

References

• Assebban, M., Tian, Z., El Kasmi, A., Bahlawane, N., Harti, S., and Chafik, T. 2015. Catalytic complete oxidation of acetylene and propene over clay versus cordierite honeycomb monoliths without and with chemical vapor deposited cobalt oxide. Chem. Eng. J., 253, 1252–1259. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.093.
   Google Scholar
• Bas, D., and Boyaci, I.H. 2007. Modeling and optimization: usability of response surface methodology. J. Food Eng., 78, 836–845. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezerra, M.A., Santelli, R.E., Oliveira, E.P., Villar, L.S., and Escaleira, L.A. 2008. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta, 76, 965–977. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary, N., and Balomajumder, C. 2014. Optimization study of adsorption parameters for removal of phenol on aluminum impregnated fly ash using response surface methodology. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 45, 852–859. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2013.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlan, I., Lee, K.T., Kamaruddin, A.H., and Mohamed, A.R. 2009. Selection of metal oxides in the preparation of rice husk ash (RHA)/CaO sorbent for simultaneous SO2 and NO removal. J. Hazard Mater., 166, 1556–1559. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, S., Dhal, G.C., Prasad, R., and Mohan, D. 2017. Effect of nitrate metal (Ce, Cu, Mn and Co) precursors for the total oxidation of carbon monoxide. Resource-Effic. Technol., 3, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Dipa, D., and Bhim, M.C. 2017. Optimization of process condition for the preparation of amine-impregnated activated carbon developed for CO2 capture and applied to methylene blue adsorption by response surface methodology. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Du, A., Zhou, B., Shen, J., Xiao, S., Zhang, Z., Liu, C., and Zhang, M. 2009. Monolithic copper oxide aerogel via dispersed inorganic sol–gel method. J. Non-Crystalline Sol., 355, 175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, H.B., Zhao, J.T., Fang, Y.T., Huang, J.J., and Wanga, Y. 2013. Selective oxidation of hydrogen sulfide to sulfur over activated carbon-supported metal oxides. Fuel, 108, 143–148. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.05.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, F., Younesi, H., Ghasempouri, S., Zinatizadeh, A.A., Amini, M., and Daneshi, A. 2008. Application of response surface methodology for optimization of cadmium biosorption in an aqueous solution by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chem. Eng. J, 145, 267–275. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.04.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groppi, G., and Tronconi, E. 2005. Honeycomb supports with high thermal conductivity for gas/solid chemical processes. Catal. Today, 105, 297–304. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.06.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S., Marahel, E., Bayesti, I., Abbasi, A., Abdullah, L.C., and Choong, T.S.Y. 2015. CO2 adsorption on modified carbon coated monolith: effect of surface modification by using alkaline solutions. Appl. Surf. Sci., 324, 569–575. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S., Rashid, S.A., Abbasi, A., Babadi, F.E., Abdullah, L.C., and Choong, T.S.Y. 2016. Effect of catalyst and substrate on growth characteristics of carbon nanofiber onto honeycomb monolith. Revis. Mexic. De Urol., 76(1), 440–449.
   Google Scholar
• Kalavathy, H.M., Regupathi, I., Pillai, M.G., and Miranda, L.R. 2009. Modelling, analysis and optimization of adsorption parameters for H3PO4 activated rubber wood sawdust using response surface methodology (RSM). Col. Surf. B: Bioint., 70, 35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karen, P., Astrid, S., and Juan, F.E. 2018. Thermodynamic evaluation of carbon dioxide gasification reactions at oxy-combustion conditions. Combust. Scie. Technol., 190, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/00102202.2018.1454916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katre, G., Raskar, S., Zinjarde, S., Kumar, V.R., Kulkarni, B.D., and Kumar, A.R. 2018. Optimization of the in situ transesterification step for biodiesel production using biomass of Yarrowia lipolytica NCIM 3589 grown on waste cooking oil. Energy, 142, 944–952. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiman, S., Ghani, W.A.W.A.K., Choong, T.S.Y., and Rashid, U. 2018. Carbonaceous materials modified catalysts for simultaneous SO2/NOx removal from flue gas: a review. Catal. Revi., 61, 1–29. doi: 10.1080/01614940.2018.1482641
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer, M., Du, P., Heiszwolf, J.J., Kapteijn, F., and Moulijn, J.A. 2001. Mass transfer characteristics of three-phase monolith reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci., 56, 6015–6023. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00271-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapham, D.P., and Julie, L.L. 2017. Gas adsorption on commercial magnesium stearate: effects of degassing conditions on nitrogen BET surface area and isotherm characteristics. Int. J. Pharm., 530, 364–376. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, L.C., Lee, K.T., and Mohamed, A.R. 2011. Simultaneous SO2 and NO removal using sorbents derived from rice husks: an optimization study. Fuel, 90, 1811–1817. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, E., Kobayashi, N., and Hu, Y. 2008. The activated coke preparation for SO2 adsorption by using flue gas from coal power plant. Chem. Eng. Proc., 47, 118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2007.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Zhao, J., Dan, Y., Ma, D., Zhao, Y., Hou, S., Lin, H., and Wang, Z. 2011. Low temperature aqueous synthesis of highly dispersed Co3O4 nanocubes and their electrocatalytic activity studies. Chem. Eng. J., 166, 428–434. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.10.080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Peng, J., Zhang, L., Wana, R., Guo, S., and Zhou, L. 2010. Optimization of preparation for Co3O4 by calcination from cobalt oxalate using response surface methodology. Chem. Eng. Resour. Desal., 88, 971–976. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2010.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Yin, Y., Pan, J., Zhang, J.J., and Wang, J. 2018. Simultaneous absorption of SO2 and NO from flue gas using ultrasound/Fe2+/heat co activated per sulfate system. J. Hazard Mater., 342, 326–334. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyestanaki, A.K., Klingstedt, F., Salmi, T., and Yu, D. 2004. Deactivation of post-combustion catalysts a review. Fuel, 83, 395–408. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2003.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyashina, S.G., Kuznetsov, V.G., and Strizhak, P.A. 2018. Energy efficiency and environmental aspects of the combustion of coal-water slurries with and without petrochemicals. J. Cleaner Prod., 172, 1730–1738. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premkumar, M., and Shanthakumar, S. 2013. Process optimization for Cr (VI) removal by Mangifera Indica seed powder: a response surface methodology approach. Des. Water Treat, 53, 1–11. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2013.857615
   Google Scholar
• Ren, X., Sun, R., Meng, X., Vorobiev, N., Schiemann, M., and Levendis, Y.A. 2017. Carbon, sulfur and nitrogen oxide emissions from combustion of pulverized raw and torrefied biomass. Fuel, 188, 310–323. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, S., Bauer, T., Al-Dahhan, M., Lehner, P., and Turek, T. 2004. Monoliths as multiphase reactors: a review. AIChE J., 11, 2918–2938. doi: 10.1002/aic.10268.
   Google Scholar
• Silas, K., Azlina, G.W., Thomas, C.Y., and Umer, R. 2018b. Activated carbon monolith Co3O4 based catalyst: synthesis, characterization and adsorption studies. Environ. Technol. Inno., 12, 273–285. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2018.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silas, K., Azlina, W., Ab, W., Ghani, K., Shean, T., Choong, Y., and Rashid, U. 2018a. Breakthrough studies of Co3O4 supported activated carbon monolith for simultaneous SO2 /NOx removal from fl ue gas. Fuel Proc. Technol., 180, 155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R., Chadetrika, R., Kumara, R., Bishnoi, K., Bhatia, D., Kumara, A., Bishnoi, N.R., and Singh, S. 2010. Biosorption optimization of lead(II), cadmium(II) and copper(II) using response surface methodology and applicability in isotherms and thermodynamics modeling. J. Hazard Mater., 174, 623–634. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumathi, S., Bhatia, L.C., Lee, K.T., and Mohamed, A.R. 2010. Adsorption isotherm models and properties of SO2 and NO removal by palm shell activated carbon supported with cerium (Ce/PSAC). Chem. Eng. J., 162, 194–200. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, I.A., Ahmad, A.L., and Hameed, B.H. 2008. Optimization of preparation conditions for activated carbons from coconut husk using response surface methodology. Chem. Eng. J., 137, 462–470. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.04.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiruvenkatachari, R., Su, S., Xiang, X., and Yonggang, Y. 2015. A site trial demonstration of CO2 capture from real flue gas by novel carbon fibre composite monolith adsorbents. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Cont., 42, 415–423. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titus, S.V., Johan, A., and Martens, A. 2011. Standardization for BET fitting of adsorption isotherms. Microp. Mesop. Mater., 145, 188–193. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, B., Kueh, B., Yusup, S., and Osman, Y. 2018. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of Melaleuca cajuputi leaves for herbicides allelopathy: optimization and kinetics modeling. J. CO₂ Util., 24, 220–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, G., Feng, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Chen, Y., and Dan, Y. 2018. The promotional role of Ni in FeVO4/TiO2 monolith catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Appl. Surf. Sci., 427, 24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuanguang, Z., Youcun, C., Tao, W., Juhong, Z.A., and Yinguo, Z. 2008. Synthesis and magnetic properties of nanoporous Co3O4 nanoflowers. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 114, 257–261. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar