Evaluation of Pore Size and Surface Morphology during Devolatilization of Coconut Fiber and Sugarcane Bagasse

References

• Adebisi, J. A., J. O. Agunsoye, S. A. Bello, M Haris, M. M. Ramakokovhu, M. O. Daramola, and S. B. Hassan. 2017. Proximate analysis and physicochemical properties of sugarcane bagasse, cassava periderm and maize stalk. In International workshop on advanced functional nanomaterials – IWAN 4. 67–76. Chennai, Tamil Nadu: Centre for Nanoscience and Technology, Anna University.
   Google Scholar
• Avinash Kumar, A. 2007. Electrification and bio-energy options in rural India. Italy: India Infrastructure Report.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, E. P., L. G. Joyner, and P. P. Halenda. 1951. The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I. Computations from nitrogen isotherms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73:373–80. doi:10.1021/ja01145a126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, S. K., and D. D. Perlmutter. 1980. A random pore model for fluid-solid reactions: 1. Isothermal, kinetic control. AlChE J. 26 (3):379–86. doi:10.1002/aic.690260308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, S. K., and D. D. Perlmutter. 1981. A random pore model for fluid-solid reactions: II. Diffusion and transport effects. AlChE J. 27 (2):247–54. doi:10.1002/aic.690270211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biagini, E., P. Narducci, and L. Tognotti. 2008. Size and structural characterization of lignin-cellulosic fuels after the rapid devolatilization. Fuel 87:177–86. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2007.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonelli, P. R., E. L. Buonomo, and A. L. Cukierma. 2007. Pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse and co-pyrolysis with an Argentinean subbituminous coal. Energy Sources Part A 29 (8):731–40. doi:10.1080/00908310500281247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradd, E. L. 2009. Understanding adsorption in mesoporous materials through lattice-based density functional theory and Monte Carlo simulation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts - Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Combustion, Gasification & Propulsion Laboratory, IISc, Bangalore, India. 2010. Biomass knowledge portal. [Online]. Accessed February 14, 2019. https://biomasspower.gov.in/karnataka.php
   Google Scholar
• Conti, J. 2016 May. International energy outlook 2016, with projections to 2040. Washington: Department of Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Y. Y., M. Koper, M. Haigh, and V. Dornburg. 2015. Country-level assessment of long-term global bioenergy potential. Biomass Bioenergy 74:253–67. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley. 2018. British petroleum energy outlook. London, UK: British Petroleum.
   Google Scholar
• Everson, R. C., R. Sakurovs, H. W. J. P. Neomagus, R. C. Everson, J. P. Mathews, and J. R. Bunt. 2017. Particle size influence on the pore development of nanopores in coal gasification chars: From micron to millimeter particles. Carbon 112:37–46. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleysteen, L. F., and V. R. Deitz. 1945. Hysteresis in the physical adsorption of Nitrogen on bone char and other adsorbents. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 35 (4):285–307. doi:10.6028/jres.035.013.
   Google Scholar
• Hiloidhari, M., D. Das, and D. C. Baruah. 2014. Bioenergy potential from crop residue biomass in India. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 32:504–12. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaraman, K., I. Gokalp, S. Petrus, V. Belandria, and S. Bostyn. 2018. Energy recovery analysis from sugar cane bagasse pyrolysis and gasification using thermogravimetry, mass spectrometry and kinetic models. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 132:225–36. doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2018.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenneth, S. 2001. The use of nitrogen adsorption for the characterisation of porous materials. Colloids Surf. A 187–189:3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kenneth, S. W. S., and T. W. Ruth. 2004. Physisorption hysteresis loops and the characterization of nanoporous materials. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 22 (10):773–82. doi:10.1260/0263617053499032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., K. Nitin, B. Prashant, and S. Ashish. 2015. A review on biomass energy resources, potential, conversion and policy in India. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 45:530–39. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowell, S., J. E. Shields, M. A. Thomas, and M. Thommes. 2004. Characterization of porous solids and powders: Surface area, pore size and density. United States of America: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H., E. Ip, J. Scott, P. Foster, M. Vickers, and L. L. Baxter. 2010. Effects of particle shape and size on devolatilization of biomass particle. Fuel 89:1156–68. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2008.10.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, T., P. Murugan, J. Abedi, and N. Mahinpey. 2010. Pyrolysis of wheat straw in a thermogravimetric analyzer: Effect of particle size and heating rate on devolatilization and estimation of global kinetics. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 88 (8):952–58. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2010.02.008.
   Google Scholar
• Ounas, A., A. Aboulkas, A. Bacaoui, and A. Yaacoubi. 2011. Pyrolysis of olive residue and sugar cane bagasse: Non-isothermal thermogravimetric kinetic analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 102:11234–38. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, L., X. Tang, Z. Wang, and X. Peng. 2017. Pore characterization of different types of coal from coal and gas outburst disaster sites using low temperature nitrogen adsorption approach. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 27 (2):371–77. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajiv Kumar, C. 2018. Will India’s coal power pose a threat to limiting global warming to safe levels? Curr. Sci. 114 (9):1812–14. doi:10.18520/cs/v114/i09/1812-1814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranganadham, M. V. S. 2018. Energy statistics. Energy statistics report, twenty fifth issue. New Delhi: Government of India Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Rashad, A. H. 2013. Biomass production for energy in India: Review. J. Technol. Innovations Renewable Energy 2 (4):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sage, R. F., M. M. Peixoto, and T. L. Sage. 2013. Photosynthesis in sugarcane. In Sugarcane: Physiology, biochemistry, and functional biology, 121–54. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Saidur, R., E. A. Abdelaziz, A. Demirbas, M. S. Hossain, and S. Mekhilef. 2011. A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 15 (5):2262–89. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sextona, D. C., J. M. Steera, R. Marsh, and M. Greenslade. 2018. Investigating char agglomeration in blast furnace coal injection. Fuel Process. Technol. 178:24–34. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R., and A. D. Setiawan. 2013. Biomass energy policies and strategies: Harvesting potential in India and Indonesia. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 22:332–45. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speight, J. G. 2013. Coal-fired power generation Handbook. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken.
   Google Scholar
• Swapan, S., and G. Shalini. 2017. Pyrolysis of coconut husk biomass: Analysis of its biochar properties. Energy Sources Part A 39 (8):761–67. doi:10.1080/15567036.2016.1263252.
   Google Scholar
• Thommes, M., K. Kaneko, A. V. Neimark, J. P. Olivier, F. Rodriguez-Reinoso, J. Rouquerol, and K. S. Sing. 2015. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution. Pure Appl. Chem. 87 (9–10):1–19. doi:10.1515/pac-2014-1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas, A., T. Chellappa, and J. L. Goldfarb. 2017. Porosity development and reactivity changes of coal–Biomass blendsduring co-pyrolysis at various temperatures. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 124:79–88. doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2017.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, K., S. Hu, Y. Wang, L. Zhang, S. Su, L. Jiang, … J. Xiang. 2018. Relation between char structures and formation of volatiles during the pyrolysis of Shenfu coal: Further understanding on the effects of mobile phase and fixed phase. Fuel Process. Technol. 178:379–85. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.07.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., R. Yan, H. Chen, D. H. Lee, and C. Zheng. 2007. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–88. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesid Javier, R.-O., and T. Katia. 2015. Isoconversional kinetic study of the thermal decomposition of sugarcane straw for thermal conversion processes. Bioresour. Technol. 196:136–44. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., M. Zhai, X. Wang, J. Sun, P. Dong, P. Liu, and Q. Zhu. 2015. Preparation and characteristics of biomass char. Bio Resour. 10 (2):3017–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar