The Influence of Stove Materials on the Combustion Performance of a Hybrid Draft Biomass Cookstove

References

• Arora, P., S. Jain, and K. Sachdeva. 2014. Laboratory based assessment of cookstove performance using energy and emission parameters for North Indian cooking cycle. Biomass Bioenergy 69:211–21. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerkari, P. 1996. Mechanical and physical properties of engineering alumina ceramics. VTT Tiedotteita - Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus, (1792).
   Google Scholar
• Ayub, I., A. Munir, W. Amjad, A. Ghafoor, and M. S. Nasir. 2018. Energy- and exergy-based thermal analyses of a solar bakery unit. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 133 (2):1001–13. doi:10.1007/s10973-018-7165-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S. F. 1988. Biomass stoves: Engineering design, development and dissemination. Volunteers in Technical Assistance. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(88)90026-1.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, S. C. 2015. Influence of India’s transformation on residential energy demand. Appl. Energy 143:228–37. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwei, B. F., W. Gi, and K. J. Dowding (2000) ‘Determination of thermal conductivity of 304 stainless steel using parameter estimation techniques’, Proceedings of NHTC, 34th National Heat Transfer Conference, August 20-22, 2000, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Boafo-Mensah, G., K. M. Darkwa, and G. Laryea. 2020. Effect of combustion chamber material on the performance of an improved biomass cookstove. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. Elsevier Ltd. 21 (April):100688. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2020.100688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, T. C., S. J. Doherty, D. W. F, P. M. Forster, T. Berntsen, B. J. DeAngelo, M. G. Flanner, S. Ghan, B. Kärcher, D. Koch, et al. 2013. ‘Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system a scientifc assessment.Pdf. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118 (11):5380–552. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caubel, J. J., V. H. Rapp, S. S. Chen, and A. J. Gadgil. 2018. Optimization of secondary air injection in a wood-burning cookstove: An experimental study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52 (7):4449–56. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b05277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clean Cooking Alliance. 2018. Voluntary Performance Targets, United Nations Foundation. https://www.cleancookingalliance.org/technology-and-fuels/standards/iwa-tiers-of-performance.html:
   Google Scholar
• Colorado State University. 2014. Cookstove durability protocol, The global alliance for clean cookstoves.
   Google Scholar
• Council, W. E. 2016. World energy resources.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, L., D. Torres-Rojas, M. Burford, T. H. Whitlow, J. Lehmann, and E. M. Fisher. 2018. Fuel sensitivity of biomass cookstove performance. Appl. Energy 215 (January):13–20. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA, PCIA. (2014) The Water Boiling Test, version 4.2.3. http://www.cleancookstoves.org/our-work/standards-and-testing/learn-about-testing-protocols/.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, P., and D. P. D. Incropera. nodate. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer.
   Google Scholar
• Gandigude, A., and M. Nagarhalli. 2018. Review of rocket cook-stove geometrical aspects for its performance improvement. Mater. Today Proc. Elsevier Ltd. 5 (2):4743–47. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.047.
   Google Scholar
• Global Allianace For Clean Cookstove. 2017. Handbook for biomass cookstove research, design, and development : A practical guide to implementing recent advances. http://cleancookstoves.org/binary-data/RESOURCE/file/000/000/517-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., N. Unger, T. Storelvmo, K. Harper, Y. Zheng, and C. Heyes. 2018. Global radiative effects of solid fuel cookstove aerosol emissions. Atmospheric Chem. Phys 18 (8):5219–33. doi:10.5194/acp-18-5219-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA. 2019. World energy outlook 2019. World Energy Outlook Sereies. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019%0Ahttps://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019%0Ahttps://webstore.iea.org/download/summary/2467?fileName=Japanese-Summary-WEO2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. 2021. India energy outlook 2021. India Energy Outlook 2021. doi: 10.1787/ec2fd78d-en.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M. M., R. Wathore, H. Zerriffi, J. D. Marshall, R. Bailis, and A. P. Grieshop. 2021. In-use emissions from biomass and LPG stoves measured during a large, multi-year cookstove intervention study in rural India. Sci. Total Environ. 758:143698. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. 2012. IWA 11:2012 Guidelines for evaluating cookstove performance. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/61975.html.
   Google Scholar
• Khandelwal, M., M. E. Hill, P. Greenough, J. Anthony, M. Quill, M. Linderman, and H. S. Udaykumar. 2017. Why have improved cook-stove initiatives in India failed? World Dev. 92:13–27. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kshirsagar, M. P., and V. R. Kalamkar. 2014. A comprehensive review on biomass cookstoves and a systematic approach for modern cookstove design. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 30:580–603. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kshirsagar, M. P., and V. R. Kalamkar. 2015. A mathematical tool for predicting thermal performance of natural draft biomass cookstoves and identification of a new operational parameter. Energy 93:188–201. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kshirsagar, M. P., and V. R. Kalamkar. 2016. User-centric approach for the design and sizing of natural convection biomass cookstoves for lower emissions. Energy 115:1202–15. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kshirsagar, M. P., and V. R. Kalamkar. 2020. Application of multi-response robust parameter design for performance optimization of a hybrid draft biomass cook stove. Renew. Energy 153:1127–39. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kshirsagar, M. P., V. R. Kalamkar, and R. R. Pande. 2020. Multi-response robust design optimization of natural draft biomass cook stove using response surface methodology and desirability function. Biomass Bioenergy 135 (March 2019):105507. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, N. M. P. 1984. The thermal insulating properties of vermiculite. J. Therm. Envel. Build. Sci 8 (2):107–15. doi:10.1177/109719638400800205.
   Google Scholar
• Magnone, E., S. K. Park, and J. H. Park. 2016. Effects of moisture contents in the common oak on carbonaceous aerosols generated from combustion processes in an indoor wood stove. Combust. Sci. Technol. 188 (6):982–96. doi:10.1080/00102202.2015.1136300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, Y., and C. Richards. 2020. Effect of air flow rate and secondary air jets on the operation of TLUD gasifier cookstove. Int. J. Sustain. Energy Taylor & Francis. 39 (3):207–17. doi:10.1080/14786451.2019.1671388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, S. A., M. S. Jaiswal, Y. Jain, V. Acharya, and D. S. Upadhyay. 2020. A comprehensive review and a systematic approach to enhance the performance of improved cookstove (ICS). J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. Springer International Publishing. 141 (6):2253–63. doi:10.1007/s10973-020-09736-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, R. 2019. Improving traditional multipot biomass cookstove: An experimental and numerical approach. VNIT, Visveswaraya National Institute of Technology. doi:10.1515/9783110800487.39.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, R. R., V. R. Kalamkar, and M. Kshirsagar. 2019. Making the popular clean: Improving the traditional multipot biomass cookstove in Maharashtra, India. Environ. Dev. Sustain. Springer Netherlands. 21 (3):1391–410. doi:10.1007/s10668-018-0092-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, R. R., V. R. Kalamkar, and M. P. Kshirsagar (2019) ‘The effect of inlet area ratio on the performance of multi-pot natural draft biomass cookstove’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India Section A - Physical Sciences. Springer India. doi: 10.1007/s40010-019-00650-3.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, R. R., M. P. Kshirsagar, and V. R. Kalamkar. 2018. Experimental and CFD analysis to study the effect of inlet area ratio in a natural draft biomass cookstove. In Environment, development and sustainability, Springer Netherlands, ( 0123456789). doi:10.1007/s10668-018-0269-x.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, R. R., S. K. Sharma, and V. R. Kalamkar. 2019. Experimental and numerical analyses for designing two-pot biomass cookstove. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 41 (8):1–18. doi:10.1007/s40430-019-1839-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlite Institute. 2011. Physical characteristics of perlite. https://www.perlite.org/library-perlite-info/perlite-library.html.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, K. K. 1981. Some studies on open fires, shielded fires and heavy stoves. Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology. https://pure.tue.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/4414520/140651.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pundle, A. 2019. Combustion, Heat Transfer and Soot Formation in Biomass-Burning Cookstoves. Washington: University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Report, L. (2014. Clean and improved cooking in Sub-Saharan Africa. ( 98664), 182. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/164241468178757464/pdf/98664-REVISED-WP-P146621-PUBLIC-Box393185B.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sambandam, S., K. Balakrishnan, S. Ghosh, A. Sadasivam, S. Madhav, R. Ramasamy, M. Samanta, K. Mukhopadhyay, H. Rehman, and V. Ramanathan. 2015. Can currently available advanced combustion biomass cook-stoves provide health relevant exposure reductions? Results from Initial assessment of select commercial models in India. EcoHealth 12 (1):25–41. doi:10.1007/s10393-014-0976-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P. nodate. Rocket stove design guide.
   Google Scholar
• Sharook, S., D. Sathyan, and M. K. Madhavan. 2020. Thermo-mechanical and durability properties of expanded perlite aggregate foamed concrete. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Construction Materials, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1680/jcoma.20.00041.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A., B. Tuladhar, K. Bajracharya, and A. Pillarisetti. 2012. Assessment of effectiveness of improved cook stoves in reducing indoor air pollution and improving health in Nepal. Energy Sustain. Dev. International Energy Initiative. 16 (4):406–14. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2012.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutar, K. B., S. Kohli, M. R. Ravi, and A. Ray. 2015. Biomass cookstoves: A review of technical aspects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 41:1128–66. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryner, J., B. D. Willson, and A. J. Marchese. 2014. The effects of fuel type and stove design on emissions and efficiency of natural-draft semi-gasifier biomass cookstoves. Energy Sustain. Dev. Elsevier Ltd. 23 (1):99–109. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2014.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, M. 1999. Can solar cooking save the forests? Ecol. Econ. 31 (1):77–89. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00038-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Vermiculite Association. 2014. Vermiculite Data. New York, USA: The Vermiculite Association. https://www.vermiculite.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, L., J. Tryner, K. R. Bilsback, N. Good, A. Hecobian, A. Sullivan, Y. Zhou, J. L. Peel, and J. Volckens. 2019. Effects of fuel moisture content on emissions from a rocket-elbow cookstove. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (8):4648–56. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b00235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (2018) Household air pollution and health. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/household-air-pollution-and-health.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2018. Opportunities for transition to clean household energy in India. WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241513999
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Z., S. You, Y. Dai, and C.-H. Wang. 2018. Particulate emission from the gasification and pyrolysis of biomass: Concentration, size distributions, respiratory deposition-based control measure evaluation. Environ. Pollut. 242:1108–18. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar