LES Investigation of Kerosene Spray Flame Emission Characteristics in a Staged Combustor

References

• Bauerheim, M., T. Jaravel, L. Esclapez, E. Riber, L. Y. Gicquel, B. Cuenot, M. Cazalens, S. Bourgois, M. Rullaud 2015. Multiphase flow LES study of the fuel split effects on combustion instabilities in an ultra low-NOx annular combustor. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 56697, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Boger, M., D. Veynante, H. Boughanem, A. Trouvé. 1998. Direct numerical simulation analysis of flame surface density concept for large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion. Symposium (International) on Combustion, Colorado, USA, Elsevier, 27, 917–25.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, T., and P. O’rourke 1977. A numerical method for two dimensional unsteady reacting flows. Symposium (international) on combustion, Massachusetts, USA, Elsevier, 16, 1503–15.
   Google Scholar
• Charlette, F., C. Meneveau, and D. Veynante. 2002. A power-law flame wrinkling model for LES of premixed turbulent combustion Part II: Dynamic formulation. Combust. Flame 131 (1–2):181–97. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(02)00401-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., T. Yang, S. Zhang, S. Li, Z. Ren. 2021. Efficient emission modelling in lean premixed flames with pre-tabulated formation characteristics. Fuel 301:121043. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherbański, R., and E. Molga. 2020. CFD simulations of hydrogen deflagration in slow and fast combustion regime. Combust. Theory Modelling 24 (4):589–605. doi:10.1080/13647830.2020.1724336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colin, O., F. Ducros, D. Veynante, T. Poinsot. 2000. A thickened flame model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion. Phys. Fluids 12(7):1843–63. doi:10.1063/1.870436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagaut, P., and M. Cathonnet. 2006. The ignition, oxidation, and combustion of kerosene: A review of experimental and kinetic modeling. Prog. Energ. Combust. 32 (1):48–92. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2005.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggenspieler, G., and S. Menon. 2004. Large-eddy simulation of pollutant emission in a DOE-HAT combustor. J. Propul. Power 20 (6):1076–85. doi:10.2514/1.11427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felden, A., P. Pepiot, L. Esclapez, E. Riber, B. Cuenot. 2019. Including analytically reduced chemistry (ARC) in CFD applications. Acta Astronaut. 158:444–59. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foust, M., D. Thomsen, R. Stickles, C. Cooper, W. Dodds. 2012. Development of the GE aviation low emissions TAPS combustor for next generation aircraft engines. 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Tennessee, USA, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 936.
   Google Scholar
• Franzelli, B., E. Riber, and B. Cuenot. 2013. Impact of the chemical description on a Large Eddy Simulation of a lean partially premixed swirled flame. C.R. Mec. 341 (1–2):247–56. doi:10.1016/j.crme.2012.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fureby, C. 2005. A fractal flame-wrinkling large eddy simulation model for premixed turbulent combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 30 (1):593–601. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., J. Wang, W. Zhang, B. Lin, Y. Wu, S. Yu, G. Li, Z. Hu, Z. Huang. 2019. Investigation on bluff-body and swirl stabilized flames near lean blowoff with PIV/PLIF measurements and LES modelling. Appl. Therm. Eng. 160:114021. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, X., X. Hui, C. Zhang, Y. Lin, P. He, C. J. Sung. 2017. Combustion instabilities in a lean premixed pre-vaporized combustor at high-pressure high-temperature. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 50855, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, C., S. Gupta, A. Abbas, T. A. Langrish, D. F. Fletcher. 2017. Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) analysis of CFD data for flow in an axisymmetric sudden expansion. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 123:333–46. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2017.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Z., T. Guo, X. Han, J. Mao. 2022. Very Large Eddy Simulation of Lean Premixed Flames to Imposed Inlet Velocity Oscillations. Combust. Sci. Technol 194(14):2933–56. doi:10.1080/00102202.2021.1901280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuron, M., Z. Ren, E. R. Hawkes, H. Zhou, H. Kolla, J, H. Chen, T. Lu. 2017. A mixing timescale model for TPDF simulations of turbulent premixed flames. Combust. Flame 177:171–83. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., H. Zhou, L. Hou, Z. Ren. 2017. An analytic model for the effects of nitrogen dilution and premixing characteristics on NOx formation in turbulent premixed hydrogen flames. Int. J. Hydrog Energy 42(10):7060–70. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meraner, C., T. Li, M. Ditaranto, T. Løvås. 2019. Combustion and NOx Emission Characteristics of a Bluff Body Hydrogen Burner. Energy & Fuels 33(5):4598–610. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b00313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongia, H. 2003. TAPS: A fourth generation propulsion combustor technology for low emissions. AIAA International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition: The Next 100 Years, Ohio, USA, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2657.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. H., J. Park, C. Sin, S. Jung, S. Kim. 2021. Numerical Investigation of the Pressure Effect on the NOx Formation in a Lean-Premixed Gas Turbine Combustor. Energy & Fuels 35(8):6776–84. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nivarti, G., R. Cant, and S. Hochgreb. 2019. Reconciling turbulent burning velocity with flame surface area in small-scale turbulence. J. Fluid. Mech 858:1–11. doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecquery, F., V. Moureau, G. Lartigue, L. Vervisch, A. Roux. 2014. Modelling nitrogen oxide emissions in turbulent flames with air dilution: Application to LES of a non-premixed jet-flame. Combust. Flame 161(2):496–509. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.09.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, N. 1999. The turbulent burning velocity for large-scale and small-scale turbulence. J. Fluid. Mech 384:107–32. doi:10.1017/S0022112098004212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasool, R., N. Chakraborty, and M. Klein. 2021. Algebraic Flame Surface Density Modelling of High Pressure Turbulent Premixed Bunsen Flames. Flow Turbul. Combust. 106 (4):1313–27. doi:10.1007/s10494-020-00128-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Z., H. Yang, and T. Lu. 2014. Effects of small-scale turbulence on NOx formation in premixed flame fronts. Fuel 115:241–47. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2013.06.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjunnesson, A., P. Henrikson, and C. Lofstrom 1992. CARS measurements and visualization of reacting flows in a bluff body stabilized flame. 28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit (Joint Propulsion Conferences, Tennessee, USA, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, T., C. Song, H. Wang, C. Xu, K. Luo, J. Fan 2023. The effects of turbulence on the flame structure and NO formation of ammonia turbulent premixed combustion at various equivalence ratios. Fuel 332:126127. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oijen, J., and L. De Goey. 2000. Modelling of premixed laminar flames using flamelet-generated manifolds. Combust. Sci. Technol 161 (1):113–37. doi:10.1080/00102200008935814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wabel, T. M. 2017. An experimental investigation of premixed combustion in extreme turbulence. Ph.D. Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Z. Wang, X. Hui, M. Han, C. Liu, W. Tao. 2022. Effect of confinement on exit temperature distribution of centrally staged combustor. J. Eng Thermophys 43 (1):240–50.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, B., C. Zhang, Y. Lin, X. Hui, J. Li 2017. Influence of main swirler vane angle on the ignition performance of TeLESS-II combustor. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(1):011501. doi:10.1115/1.4034154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., P. C. Ma, Y. Lv, M. Ihme. 2017. MVP-Workshop Contribution: Modeling of Volvo bluff body flame experiment. In 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. AIAA SciTech Forum: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, J., J. R. Travis, and M. Kuznetsov. 2015. Numerical investigations of heat losses to confinement structures from hydrogen-air turbulent flames in ENACCEF facility. Int. J. Hydrog Energy 40 (38):13106–20. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Q. Huang, J. Sun, P. Ma, S. Li 2022. Reducing NOx emission of swirl-stabilized ammonia/methane tubular flames through a fuel-oxidizer mixing strategy. Energy & Fuels 36(4):2277–87. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c04004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T., Y. Yin, H. Zhou, Z. Ren 2021. Review of Lagrangian stochastic models for turbulent combustion. Acta Mech. Sin. 37(10):1467–88. doi:10.1007/s10409-021-01142-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, T., Y. Pei, B. J. Zhong, S. Som, T. Lu, K. H Luo. 2017. A compact skeletal mechanism for n-dodecane with optimized semi-global low-temperature chemistry for diesel engine simulations. Fuel 191:339–49. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, F. T., and Ö. L. Gülder. 2013. Turbulent premixed flame front dynamics and implications for limits of flamelet hypothesis. Proc. Combust. Inst. 34 (1):1393–400. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.167.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., C. Han, T. Ye, Z. Ren. 2016. Large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion using tabulated detailed chemistry and presumed probability density function. J. Turbulence 17(3):327–55. doi:10.1080/14685248.2015.1096364.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., S. Karaca, J. Wang, Z. Huang, J. Van Oijen. 2021. Large eddy simulation of the Cambridge/Sandia stratified flame with flamelet-generated manifolds: Effects of non-unity Lewis numbers and stretch. Combust. Flame 227:106–19. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Z. Lu, and Y. Yang. 2021. Modeling the displacement speed in the flame surface density method for turbulent premixed flames at high pressures. Phys. Fluids 33 (4):045118. doi:10.1063/5.0045750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimont, V. 1979. Theory of turbulent combustion of a homogeneous fuel mixture at high Reynolds numbers. Combust, Explos, shock. Waves 15 (3):305–11. doi:10.1007/BF00785062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimont, V., W. Polifke, M. Bettelini, W. Weisenstein. 1998. An efficient computational model for premixed turbulent combustion at high Reynolds numbers based on a turbulent flame speed closure. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 120(3):526–32. doi:10.1115/1.2818178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar