Confinement Effects on Coaxial Jet Diffusion Flame

References

• Bai, N. J., W. J. Fan, and R. C. Zhang. 2023. A mixing enhancement mechanism for a hydrogen transverse jet coupled with a shear layer for gas turbine combustion. Phys. Fluids 35:4. doi:10.1063/5.0142960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barchilon, M., and R. Curtet. 1964. Some details of the structure of an axisymmetric confined jet with backflow. J. B. E 86 (4):777–87. doi:10.1115/1.3655953.
   Google Scholar
• Blevins, L. G., and J. P. Gore. 1995. A study of radiant tube flame structure and NOx emissions. Combust. Sci. Technol 109 (1–6):255–71. doi:10.1080/00102209508951904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, S. P., and T. E. W. Schumann. 1928. Diffusion flames. Proc. Sym. On Combust 20 (10):999–1004. doi:10.1021/ie50226a005.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, M. S., and S. H. Chung. 1996. Characteristics of lifted flames in nonpremixed turbulent confined jets. ISOC 26 (1):121–28. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(96)80208-6.
   Google Scholar
• Chemkin-Pro. 2021. Reaction Design. San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., and A. K. Gupta. 2007. Computational study of a MEMS-based catalyzed micro-thruster with homogeneous chemical reaction. In Proceedings of Technical Papers - 2007, IMPACT, 305–08. doi:10.1109/IMPACT.2007.4433623.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. F., D. Liu, and J. Bo. 2020. Soot formation and combustion characteristics in confined mesoscale combustors under conventional and oxy-combustion conditions (O2/N2 and O2/CO2). Fuel 264 (March):116808. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116808.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, S. K., W. M. Yang, K. J. Chua, J. Li, and K. L. Zhang. 2011. Development of micro power generators - a review. Appl. Energ. 88 (1):1–16. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, H. Q., W. W. Han, W. J. Cao, M. Y. Gu, and G. J. Xu. 2019. Effect of methane addition to ethylene on the morphology and size distribution of soot in a laminar co-flow diffusion flame. Energy 166:392–400. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. H., and C. K. Law. 1984. Burke–Schumann flame with streamwise and preferential diffusion. Combust. Sci. Technol 37 (1–2):21–46. doi:10.1080/00102208408923744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, H. Q., Y. C. Ya, X. K. Nie, Y. Zhou, J. L. Hu, S. L. Dong, and E. Jiaqiang. 2020. Effects of ethanol and 2, 5-dimethylfuran addition on the morphology and nanostructure evolution of soot in gasoline primary reference fuel-air coflow diffusion flames. Fuel 281 (March):118711. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118711.
   Google Scholar
• Curtet, R. 1958. Confined jets and recirculation phenomena with cold air. Combust. Flame 2 (4):383–411. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(58)90032-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerksen, G., Z. Paul, K. Artem, and J. Craig. 2022. A numerical investigation of recirculation in axisymmetric confined jets. Chem. Eng. Sci. 254 (June):117603. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2022.117603.
   Google Scholar
• Elbaz, A. M., and W. L. Roberts. 2016. Investigation of the effects of quarl and initial conditions on swirling non-premixed methane flames: Flow field, temperature, and species distributions. Fuel 169:120–34. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exley, J. T., and J. A. Brighton. 1971. Flow separation and reattachment in confined jet mixing. JBE 93 (2):192–98. doi:10.1115/1.3425211.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Pello, A. C. 2002. Micropower generation using combustion: Issues and approaches. Proc. Combust. Inst. 29 (1):883–99. doi:10.1016/s1540-7489(02)80113-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, Y. H., J. L. Xu, Y. Y. Yan, M. Wang, Y. L. Luo, and Z. L. Yang. 2014. A comparative study on free jet and confined jet diffusion flames of liquid ethanol from small nozzles. Combust. Sci. Technol 186 (2):120–38. doi:10.1080/00102202.2013.851077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi, M. D., S. Aldebara, C. Stefano, and F. Antonio. 2017. Flame structure and chemiluminescence emissions of inverse diffusion flames under sinusoidally driven plasma discharges. Energies 10 (3):334. doi:10.3390/en10030334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamed, A. M., M. M. Kamal, and A. E. Hussin. 2023. Characteristics of hollow bluff body-stabilized natural gas-air premixed flames with heat recirculation. Fuel 333 (P2):126430. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126430.
   Google Scholar
• Hariharan, V., and D. P. Mishra. 2020. Static flame stability of circumferentially arranged fuel port inverse jet non-premixed flame burner. Combust. Sci. Technol 192 (8):1493–519. doi:10.1080/00102202.2019.1611567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, P. G. 1965. Turbulent jets in ducted streams. J. Fluid. Mech. 22 (1):161–86. doi:10.1017/S0022112065000654.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, A. A., G. Maryam, M. Mohammad, and H. P. Seyed. 2020. Numerical study of inlet air swirl intensity effect of a methane-air diffusion flame on its combustion characteristics. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 18 (April):100610. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2020.100610.
   Google Scholar
• Hunger, F., S. Björn, T. Dimosthenis, and H. Christian. 2013. Flamelet-modeling of inverse rich diffusion flames. Flow Turbul. Combust. 90 (4):833–57. doi:10.1007/s10494-012-9422-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kana-Donfack, P., C. Kapseu, D. Tcheukam-Toko, and G. Ndong-Essengue. 2019. Numerical modeling of sugarcane bagasse combustion in sugar mill boiler. JEPE 13 (2):80–90. doi:10.17265/1934-8975/2019.02.004.
   Google Scholar
• Karnani, S., and D. Dunn-Rankin. 2013. Visualizing CH* chemiluminescence in sooting flames. Combust. Flame 160 (10):2275–78. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karyeyen, S. 2018. Combustion characteristics of a non-premixed methane flame in a generated burner under distributed combustion conditions: A numerical study. Fuel 230 (May):163–71. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.052.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, A. E. E., and A. K. Gupta. 2016. On the flame-flow interaction under distributed combustion conditions. Fuel 182:17–26. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamoorthy, G. 2017. A computationally efficient P1 radiation model for modern combustion systems utilizing pre-conditioned conjugate gradient methods. Appl. Therm. Eng. 119:197–206. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.03.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, I. A. S., L. Henrik, T. S. Lundström, and B. D. Marjavaara. 2020. Experimental study of confined coaxial jets in a non-axisymmetric co-flow. Exp. Fluids 61 (12):1–17. doi:10.1007/s00348-020-03094-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemétayer, J., M. B. Lars, and P. W. Lisa. 2020. Confined jets in co-flow: Effect of the flow rate ratio and lateral position of a return cannula on the flow dynamics. SN Appl. Sci. 2 (3):1–15. doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2077-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Léonard, S., G. W. Mulholland, R. Puri, and R. J. Santoro. 1994. Generation of CO and smoke during underventilated combustion. Combust. Flame 98 (1–2):20–34. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(94)90195-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L. H., and A. W. Fan. 2021. A numerical study on non-premixed H2/Air flame stability in a micro-combustor with a slotted bluff-body. Int. J. Hydrog Energy 46 (2):2658–66. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., and L. Jia. 2014. Investigation on combustion characteristics and NO formation of methane with swirling and non-swirling high temperature air. J. Therm. Sci. 23 (5):472–79. doi:10.1007/s11630-014-0731-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. Y., B. C. Zhu, J. C. Chen, J. J. Wu, K. Lu, M. Y. Gu, and H. Q. Chu. 2020. Study of soot functional groups and morphological characteristics in laminar coflow methane and ethylene diffusion flames with hydrogen addition. Fuel 279 (March):118474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118474.
   Google Scholar
• Mahesh, S., and D. P. Mishra. 2008. Flame stability and emission characteristics of turbulent LPG IDF in a backstep burner. Fuel 87 (12):2614–19. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2008.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masquelet, M., and S. Menon. 2010. Large-eddy simulation of flame-turbulence interactions in a shear coaxial injector. J. Propuls. Power 26 (5):924–35. doi:10.2514/1.48023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullinger, P., and B. Jenkins. 2008. Industrial and process furnaces: Principles, design and operation. Chennai: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Rajaratnam, N. 1976. Turbulent jets. Elsevier. New York: Elsevier. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780120218134500068%0Ahttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022112077220866/type/journal_article.
   Google Scholar
• Roper, F. G. 1977. The prediction of laminar jet diffusion flame sizes: Part I. theoretical model. Combust. Flame 29 (January):219–26. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(77)90112-2.
   Google Scholar
• Roper, F. G., C. Smith, and A. C. Cunningham. 1977. The prediction of laminar jet diffusion flame sizes: Part II. experimental verification. Combust. Flame 29 (C):227–34. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(77)90113-4.
   Google Scholar
• Sahraei, M. H., A. D. Marc, W. H. Robin, and A. R. S. Luis. 2017. Dynamic reduced order modeling of an entrained-flow slagging gasifier using a new recirculation ratio correlation. Fuel 196:520–31. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scribano, G., S. Giulio, and C. Aldo. 2006. Pollutant emissions reduction and performance optimization of an industrial radiant tube burner. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 30 (7):605–12. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2005.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scribano, G., and M. V. Tran. 2020. Numerical investigation of a confined diffusion flame in a swirl burner. Eur. J. Mech. B-Fluid 82:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2020.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, X. D., R. M. Wu, Y. Zhou, J. F. Wang, J. T. Wei, J. Y. Li, and G. S. Yu. 2021. Understanding the influence of burner structure on the stability and chemiluminescence of inverse diffusion flame. Int. J. Hydrog Energy 46 (48):24461–71. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelzner, B., F. Hunger, A. Laugwitz, M. Gräbner, S. Voss, K. Uebel, M. Schurz, Schimpke R., Weise S., Krzack S. et al. 2013. Development of an inverse diffusion partial oxidation flame and model burner contributing to the development of 3rd generation coal gasifiers. Fuel Process Technol. 110:33–45. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, D. C., and J. Ahn. 2011. Advances and challenges in the development of power-generation systems at small scales. Prog. Energy. Combust 37 (5):583–610. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2010.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. Y., B. S. Peter, and L. A. Richard. 2020. Double blue zones in inverse and normal laminar jet diffusion flames. Combust. Flame 211:253–59. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, K., and S. Ishizuka. 2003. Temperatures of positively and negatively stretched flames. JSME Int. J. Ser. B 46 (1):198–205. doi:10.1299/jsmeb.46.198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. K., W. J. Kong, C. J. Sui, T. Wang, and L. Peng. 2022. Effect of hydrogen-rich fuels on turbulent combustion of advanced gas turbine. J. Therm. Sci. 31 (2):561–70. doi:10.1007/s11630-021-1539-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. T., F. Y. Li, G. F. Wang, Q. F. Huang, and Q. Z. Lin. 2018. Liftoff behavior and combustion characteristic of jet flame in a coflow burner. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Util., Environ. Eff. 40 (11):1366–73. doi:10.1080/15567036.2018.1476624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, M., and A. W. Fan. 2020. Buoyancy effects on hydrogen diffusion flames confined in a small tube. Int. J. Hydrog Energy 45 (38):19926–35. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, M., L. Liu, and A. W. Fan. 2020. Comparison of combustion efficiency of micro hydrogen jet flames confined in cylindrical tubes of different diameters. Chem. Eng. Process. 153 (July):108000. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2020.108000.
   Google Scholar
• Zhen, H. S., Y. S. Choy, C. W. Leung, and C. S. Cheung. 2011. Effects of nozzle length on flame and emission behaviors of multi-fuel-jet inverse diffusion flame burner. Appl. Energy 88 (9):2917–24. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.02.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X. R., X. Xi, and P. Zhang. 2018. Near-field flow stability of buoyant methane/air inverse diffusion flames. Combust. Flame 191 (May):66–75. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.01.009.
   Google Scholar