Design Optimization of an Improved Mud Cookstove Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

References

• Agenbroad, J., M. DeFoort, A. Kirkpatrick, and C. Kreutzer. 2011a. A simplified model for understanding natural convection driven biomass cooking stoves-part 1: Setup and baseline validation. Energy. Sustain. Dev. 15 (2):160–68. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2011.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agenbroad, J., M. DeFoort, A. Kirkpatrick, and C. Kreutzer. 2011b. A simplified model for understanding natural convection driven biomass cooking stoves-part 2: With cook piece operation and the dimensionless form. Energy. Sustain. Dev. 15 (2):169–75. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2011.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, R., Y. Zhou, C. Liang, L. Gang, N. Zhao, A. Abbas, Y. Fan, L. Li, J. Gong, D. Wang, et al. 2022. Comparative evaluation of thermal and emission performances for improved commercial coal-fired stoves in China. RSC. Adv 12 (32):20886–96. doi:10.1039/D2RA03364J.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessandro, P., M. Rafi Malik, F. Contino, A. Cuoci, and B. B. Dally. 2016. Extension of the eddy dissipation concept for turbulence/chemistry interactions to MILD combustion. Fuel 163 (January):98–111. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.020.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, S., R. Mehrabian, R. Scharler, G. M. Goldin, and I. Obernberger. 2014. Development of a gas phase combustion model suitable for low and high turbulence conditions. Fuel 126 (June):177–87. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.02.040.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, H., and T. Tang Jia Wei. 2017. CFD study of an improved biomass cookstove with reduced emission and improved heat transfer characteristics. J. Clean Energy Technol. 5 (6):427–32. doi:10.18178/JOCET.2017.5.6.410.
   Google Scholar
• Anamol, P., B. Sullivan, P. Means, J. D. Posner, and J. C. Kramlich. 2019. Predicting and analyzing the performance of biomass-burning natural draft rocket cookstoves using computational fluid dynamics. Biomass. Bioenergy 131 (October):105402. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105402.
   Google Scholar
• Ankit, G., A. N. V. Mulukutla, S. Gautam, W. TaneKhan, S. S. Waghmare, and N. K. Labhasetwar. 2020. Development of a practical evaluation approach of a typical biomass cookstove. Environ. Technol. Innovation 17 (February):100613. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2020.100613.
   Google Scholar
• Ansys Inc. 2021. Ansys fluent theory guide. https://dl.cfdexperts.net/cfd_resources/Ansys_Documentation/Fluent/Ansys_Fluent_Theory_Guide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S. F. 1987. Biomass stoves: Engineering design, development, and dissemination. Volunteers in technical assistance. Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard-Tremeer, G., and H. H. Jawurek. 1996. Comparison of five rural, wood-burning cooking devices: Efficiencies and emissions. Biomass. Bioenergy 11 (5):419–30. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(96)00040-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barpatragohain, R., B. Niyarjyoti, and P. D. Partha. 2021. Thermal performance evaluation of an improved biomass cookstove for domestic applications. In Proceedings of International Conference on Thermofluids, ed. S. Revankar, S. Sen, and D. Sahu, 579–90. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-7831-1_54.
   Google Scholar
• Bielecki, C., and G. Wingenbach. 2014. Rethinking improved cookstove diffusion programs: A case study of social perceptions and cooking choices in rural Guatemala. Energy. Policy 66 (March):350–58. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.082.
   Google Scholar
• Bordoloi, H., P. P. Dutta, and R. J. B. Gohain. 2022. Modelling of an improved biomass cook stove for rural application. In Tailored Functional Materials, ed. K. Mukherjee, R. K. Layek, and D. De, 171–83. Springer Proceedings in Materials. Singapore: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-2572-6_13.
   Google Scholar
• Budya, H., and M. Yasir Arofat. 2011. Providing cleaner energy access in Indonesia through the megaproject of kerosene conversion to LPG. Energy. Policy 39 (12):7575–86. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standards. 2013. Indian standard on portable solid bio-mass cookstove (chulha first revision). Is 13152 (part 1). https://www.services.bis.gov.in/php/BIS_2.0/bisconnect/standard_review/Standard_review/Isdetails?ID=MTI5.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham-Slipper, H., M. J. Clifford, and S. J. Pickering. 2007. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics (HEFAT2007), 1–4 July 2007, Sun City, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Bussmann, P., and K. Krishna Prasad. 1982. Model predictions of temperature and velocity profiles in turbulent diffusion buoyant flames. In Proceeding of International Heat Transfer Conference 7, 401–06. Munich, Germany: Begellhouse. doi:10.1615/IHTC7.830.
   Google Scholar
• Bussmann, P., and K. Krishna Prasad. 1986. Parameter analysis of a simple woodburning cookstove. In Proceeding of International Heat Transfer Conference 8, 3085–90. San Francisco, USA: Begellhouse. doi:10.1615/IHTC8.4540.
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, J., H. Liu, and L. Jinxing. 2012. An overview of CFD modelling of small-scale fixed-bed biomass pellet boilers with preliminary results from a simplified approach. Energy Convers. Manage. 63:149–56. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2012.01.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Y. Ren, L. Zhang, and P. Roman Scheller. 2019. Numerical simulation of steel and argon gas two-phase flow in continuous casting using LES + VOF + DPM model. JOM 71 (3):1158–68. doi:10.1007/s11837-018-3255-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clean Cooking Alliance and ENEA Consulting. 2019. Scaling LPG for cooking in developing markets: Insights from Tanzania. Washington DC: Clean Cooking Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Commeh, M. K., A. Agyei-Agyemang, P. Oppong Tawiah, and B. Atribawuni Asaaga. 2022. CFD analysis of a flat bottom institutional cookstove. Scientific. African 16:e01117. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01117.
   Google Scholar
• Čukić, I., C. Kypridemos, A. W. Evans, D. Pope, and E. Puzzolo. 2021. Towards sustainable development goal 7 ‘universal access to clean modern energy’: National strategy in Rwanda to scale clean cooking with bottled gas. Energies 14 (15):4582. doi:10.3390/en14154582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Date, A. 1988. Investigation of CTARA wood-burning stove. Part II. Analytical investigation. Sadhana 13 (4):295–317. doi:10.1007/BF02759890.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, T. F., A. P. Mann, F. Plaza, and W. N. Gilfillan. 2005. Development of advanced technology for biomass combustion—CFD as an essential tool. Fuel 84 (10):1303–11. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2004.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, P. P., R. Borpatra Gohain, and P. Protim Dutta. 2023. Performance assessment of an efficient biomass fired cook stove as a standby unit for community cooking. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 13 (13):11609–20. doi:10.1007/s13399-022-02745-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echekki, T., and E. Mastorakos eds. 2011. Turbulent combustion modeling, Vol. 95. Springer Netherlands. 10.1007/978-94-007-0412-1.
   Google Scholar
• Gist, R. 2016. Heart of the hearth: Making the popular clean, not the clean popular - technology research, development, and tools for clean biomass cookstoves. DOE-BIOLITE–06088, 1337926. doi:10.2172/1337926.
   Google Scholar
• Gist, R., V. Iyer, and V. Berrueta. 2015. Heart of the hearth: Making the popular clean, not the clean popular heart of the hearth: Making the popular clean, not the clean popular. Golden CO: U.S. Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, M. A., J. Porteiro, D. Patiño, and J. L. Míguez. 2014. CFD modelling of thermal conversion and packed bed compaction in biomass combustion. Fuel 117 (PART A):716–32. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.078.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, C. F., and J. Urpelainen. 2018. LPG as a clean cooking fuel: Adoption, use, and impact in rural India. Energy. Policy 122 (November):395–408. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.042.
   Google Scholar
• Gusain, P. P. S. 1990. Cooking energy in India. In Cooking energy in India, Vikas Publishing House Private Limited. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19911898205.
   Google Scholar
• Hasse, C., P. Debiagi, X. Wen, K. Hildebrandt, M. Vascellari, and T. Faravelli. 2021. Advanced modeling approaches for CFD simulations of coal combustion and gasification. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 86 (September):100938. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100938.
   Google Scholar
• Health Effects Institute. 2020. State of global air 2020. A special report on global exposure to air pollution and its health impacts. Boston, MA. https://www.stateofglobalair.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Husain, Z., S. S. Tiwari, A. B. Pandit, and J. B. Joshi. 2019. Computational fluid dynamics study of biomass cook stove—part 1: Hydrodynamics and homogeneous combustion. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59 (9):4161–76. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA, Paris SDG7: Data. 2022. SDG7: Data and projections access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all. https://www.Iea.Org/Reports/Sdg7-Data-and-Projections.
   Google Scholar
• IIPS. 2020. National family health survey (NFHS-5). http://rchiips.org/nfhs/.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M. M., R. Wathore, H. Zerriffi, J. D. Marshall, R. Bailis, and A. P. Grieshop. 2020. In-use emissions from biomass and LPG stoves measured during a large, multi-year cookstove intervention study in rural India. Sci. Total Environ. 758:143698. November. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. M., R. Wathore, H. Zerriffi, J. D. Marshall, R. Bailis, and A. P. Grieshop. 2022. Assessing the effects of stove use patterns and kitchen chimneys on Indoor air quality during a multiyear cookstove randomized control trial in Rural India. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56 (12):8326–37. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c07571. May, acs.est
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. 2019. ISO 19869: 2019 clean cookstoves and clean cooking solutions — field testing methods for cookstoves. ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66521.html.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, M. R., and J. Naser. 2018, June. CFD modelling of combustion and associated emission of wet woody biomass in a 4 MW moving grate boiler. Fuel 222:656–74. (Elsevier Ltd). doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kar, A., R. Wathore, A. Ghosh, S. Sharma, E. Floess, A. Grieshop, R. Bailis, and N. Labhasetwar. 2023. DDQ/Fe(NO3)3-catalyzed aerobic synthesis of 3-Acyl indoles and an in silico study for the binding affinity of N-Tosyl-3-acyl indoles toward RdRp against SARS-CoV-2. J. Org. Chem. 88 (2):838–51. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.2c02009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaundal, A., S. Powar, and A. Dhar. 2021. Numerical investigation of the effect of air supply on cook stove performance. Inhal. Toxicol 33 (5):193–203. doi:10.1080/08958378.2021.1929583. Taylor & Francis
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., K. Kang, and T. Kim. 2020. CFD simulation analysis on make-up air supply by distance from cookstove for cooking-generated particle. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 17 (21):7799. doi:10.3390/ijerph17217799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirch, T., C. H. Birzer, P. R. Medwell, and L. Holden. 2018. The role of primary and secondary air on wood combustion in cookstoves. Int. J. Sustainable Energy 37 (3):268–77. doi:10.1080/14786451.2016.1166110. Taylor & Francis
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kshirsagar, M. P., V. R. Kalamkar, and R. R. Pande. 2020a. Biomass and bioenergy multi-response robust design optimization of natural draft biomass cook stove using response surface methodology and desirability function. Biomass. Bioenergy 135 (February):105507. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105507. Elsevier Ltd
   Google Scholar
• Kshirsagar, M. P., V. R. Kalamkar, and R. R. Pande. 2020b. Multi-response robust design optimization of natural draft biomass cook stove using response surface methodology and desirability function. Biomass. Bioenergy 135 (April):105507. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105507.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., S. S. Lokras, and Jagdish, K. S.1990 Development, analysis & dissemination of a 3-pan cookstove. Bangalore, India:Karnataka State Council for Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kutkan, H., and J. Guerrero. 2021. Turbulent premixed flame modeling using the algebraic flame surface wrinkling model: A comparative study between openFOAM and ansys fluent. Fluids 6(12): doi:10.3390/fluids6120462. MDPI.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launder, B. E., and D. Brian Spalding. 1972. Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Launder, B. E., and D. B. Spalding. 1974. THe numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng . 3 (2):269–89. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2.
   Google Scholar
• Liyanage, D., G. R. U. Senavirathna, C. Rodrigo, P. Thennnakoon, P. Madawala, and K. M. Muditha Dassanayake. 2021. Design of a biomass micro gasifier cookstove by CFD modelling. J. Inst. Eng. Sri Lanka 54(4): doi:10.4038/engineer.v54i4.7467. Sri Lanka Journals Online (JOL): 15.
   Google Scholar
• MacCarty, N. A., and K. M. Bryden. 2015, June. Modeling of household biomass cookstoves: A review. Energy. Sustain. Dev. 26:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2015.02.001. (Elsevier B.V.)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mapelli, F., P. Di Milano, E. Colombo, P. Di Milano, F. Mapelli, R. Mereu, and J. Barbieri. 2013. CFD Feasibility Analysis Of An Improved Cook Stove (ICS) For Electricity Production Exergy Analysis And Exergoeconomics View Project A Solar Utility For Off-Grid Electricity Services In Tanzania View Project CFD Feasibility Analysis Of An Improved Cook Stove (ICS) For Electricity Production. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282005741.
   Google Scholar
• Marangwanda, G. T., D. M. Madyira, and T. O. Babarinde. 2020. Combustion models for biomass: A review. Energy Rep. 6:664–72. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masud, M. H., R. Ahamed, M. U. H. Mohammad, and M. Hasan. 2019. Mathematical model of heat transfer and feasibility test of improved cooking stoves in Bangladesh. Int. J. Ambient Energy 40 (3):317–28. doi:10.1080/01430750.2017.1392354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehetre, S. A., N. L. Panwar, D. Sharma, and H. Kumar. 2017. Improved biomass cookstoves for sustainable development : A Review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 73:672–87. (September 2015). doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, S. A., M. S. Jaiswal, Y. Jain, V. Acharya, and D. S. Upadhyay. 2020. A comprehensive review and a systematic approach to enhance the performance of improved cookstove (ICS). J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 141 (6):2253–63. Springer International Publishing:. doi:10.1007/s10973-020-09736-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Lionberg, D. D. 2011. A fine resolution CDF simulation approach for biomass cook stove development. Fort Collins, Colorado: Colorado State University Libraries. https://mountainscholar.org/bitstreams/d2d2baa9-a679-4751-96fa-e38cde0b5551/download
   Google Scholar
• Naved, M. M., H. Kumbhare, R. Wathore, A. Gupta, and N. Labhsetwar. 2022. Evidence for reduced performance discrepancy of improved cookstoves at laboratory and field. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 15 (4):633–44. doi:10.1007/s11869-022-01158-3. January
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, J., M. F. Moctezuma-Sánchez, E. M. Fisher, V. M. Berrueta, O. R. Masera, and A. Beltrán. 2020. Natural-draft flow and heat transfer in a plancha-type biomass cookstove. Renewable. Energy 146:727–36. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, R. R., V. R. Kalamkar, and M. Kshirsagar. 2019. Making the popular clean: Improving the traditional multipot biomass cookstove in Maharashtra, India. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 21 (3):1391–410. doi:10.1007/s10668-018-0092-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, R. R., M. P. Kshirsagar, and V. R. Kalamkar. 2020. Experimental and CFD analysis to study the effect of inlet area ratio in a natural draft biomass cookstove. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 22 (3):1897–911. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/s10668-018-0269-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, K., E. S. Krishna, and P. Visser. 1985. Woodburning cookstoves. Adv. Heat. Transf. 17:159–317. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0065-2717(08)70286-7.
   Google Scholar
• Riaz, A., A. Abbas, W. Jufei, L. Hua, M. Sultan, L. Bohong, S. M. Nyambura, and P. Xingjia. 2021. Experimental and comparative study of Chinese commercial improved coal-fired cooking and space-heating stoves. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28 (41):58135–41. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14030-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roden, C. A., T. C. Bond, S. Conway, A. Benjamin, O. Pinel, and N. Maccarty. 2009. Laboratory and field investigations of particulate and carbon monoxide emissions from traditional and improved cookstoves. Atmos. Environ. 43 (6):1170–81. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, J., A. Quinn, A. P. Grieshop, A. Pillarisetti, and R. I. Glass. 2018. Clean cooking and the SDGs: Integrated Analytical Approaches to Guide Energy Interventions for Health and environment goals. Energy for Sustainable Development 42 (February):152–59. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2017.11.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roshan, W., R. Hedaoo, A. Ahmad, A. Gupta, A. S. Dhoble, and N. Labhasetwar. 2023. Field based performance evaluation of optimized improved biomass mud cookstoves in rural India. Renewable. Energy 219:119567. November. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2023.119567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roshan, W., K. Mortimer, and A. P. Grieshop. 2017. In-use emissions and estimated impacts of traditional, natural- and forced-draft cookstoves in rural Malawi. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (3):1929–38. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvam, V., D. Ashok, I. Devi Rajamanoharan, V. Rajalakshmi, and K. Vidhya. 2022. Impact of ujjwala yojana scheme and its effect on behavioural changes among rural women. Int. J. Asian Bus. Inf. Manag. 13 (1):1–14. IGI Global. doi:10.4018/ijabim.315752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, R., and A. W. Date. 2011. Steady-state thermochemical model of a wood-burning cook-stove. Combust. Sci. Technol. 183 (4):321–46. doi:10.1080/00102202.2010.516617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivanshu, D., A. Kumar, S. Kumar, N. Waghmare, H. C. Thaku, and S. Khan. 2019. CFD analysis of biodiesel blends and combustion using ansys fluent. In Materials Today: Proceedings, 26:665–70. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.362.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, J., J. Teixeira, S. Teixeira, S. Preziati, and J. Cassiano. 2017. CFD modeling of combustion in biomass furnace. Energy. Procedia. 120:665–72. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.179.
   Google Scholar
• Sutar, K. B., M. R. R. Sangeeta Kohli, A. Ray, and A. Ray. 2015. Biomass cookstoves: A review of technical aspects. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 41:1128–66. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, D. E., and C. C. Hardy. 1991. Smoke emissions from wildland fires. Environ. Int 17 (2–3):117–34. doi:10.1016/0160-4120(91)90095-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerasinghe, W. M. S. R., and U. D. L. Kumara. 2003. CFD approach for modelling of combustion of a semi enclosed cooking stove. International Conference on Mechanical Engineering 2003 (ICME2003), 26-28 December 2003, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlgemuth, A., S. Mazumder, and D. Andreatta. 2009. Computational heat transfer analysis of the effect of skirts on the performance of third-world cookstoves. J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl. 1 (4):1–10. doi:10.1115/1.4001483.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlgemuth, A., S. Mazumder, and D. Andreatta. 2016. Analysis of the effect of skirts on the performance of third-world. J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl. 1 (4): (December 2009). doi:10.1115/1.4001483.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2023. Moving the needle on clean cooking for all. World. Bank https://projects.worldbank.org/en/results/2023/01/19/moving-the-needle-on-clean-cooking-for-all.
   Google Scholar