A Combustion Kinetic Model Based on the Fast Chemistry Assumption: Application to Non-Sooty and Sooty Laminar Diffusion Flames

References

• Ahmed, M. M., and A. Trouvé. 2021. Large eddy simulation of the unstable flame structure and gas-to-liquid thermal feedback in a medium-scale methanol pool fire. Combust. Flame 225:237–54. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.10.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almagro, A., O. Flores, M. Vera, A. Liñán, A. L. Sánchez, and F. A. Williams. 2019. Effects of differential diffusion on nonpremixed-flame temperature. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37 (2):1757–66. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansys Fluent. 2024. https://www.ansys.com/products/fluids/ansys-fluent
   Google Scholar
• Burke, S. P., and T. E. W. Schumann. 1928. Diffusion Flames. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20 (10):998–1004. ACS Publications. doi:10.1021/ie50226a005
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P., and Y. Wang. 2020. Numerical simulations of soot-radiation from buoyant turbulent wall-bounded diffusion flames. Fire Saf. J. 120:103105. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P., and Y. Wang. 2021. Numerical simulations of soot-radiation from buoyant turbulent wall-bounded diffusion flames. Fire Saf. J. 120 (January 2020):103105. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103105
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P., D. Zeng, and Y. Wang. 2021. Numerical modeling of soot radiation in optically-thin, buoyant diffusion flames at varying oxygen concentrations. Proc. Combust. Inst. 38 (3):4987–94. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2020.08.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P., J. L. De Ris, Y. Wang, and S. B. Dorofeev. 2011. A model for soot radiation in buoyant diffusion flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 33 (2):2665–71. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.112
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P., Y. Wang, K. V. Meredith, and S. B. Dorofeev. 2015. Application of a subgrid soot-radiation model in the numerical simulation of a heptane pool fire. Proc. Combust. Inst. 35 (3):2573–80. The Combustion Institute. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.045
   Google Scholar
• Cheatham, S., and M. Matalon. 2000. A General asymptotic theory of diffusion flames with application to cellular instability. J. Fluid Mech. 414:105–44. doi:10.1017/S0022112000008752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., J. Wen, B. Xu, and S. Dembele. 2014a. Large eddy simulation of a medium-scale methanol pool fire using the extended eddy dissipation concept. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 70:389–408. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., J. Wen, B. Xu, and S. Dembele. 2014b. Large eddy simulation of a medium-scale methanol pool fire using the extended eddy dissipation concept. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 70:389–408. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, E. W., D. Tse Stephen, and C. K. Law. 2003. A computational study of oscillatory extinction of spherical diffusion flames. Combust. Flame 134 (4):327–37. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(03)00112-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, H. J. 2019. Developing detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms for fuel combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37 (1):57–81. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler, L., F. Luiz Sacomano Filho, F. Ries, H. Nicolai, J. Janicka, and A. Sadiki. 2021. Numerical prediction of turbulent spray flame characteristics using the filtered Eulerian stochastic field approach coupled to tabulated chemistry. Fluids 6 (2):50. doi:10.3390/fluids6020050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fire Modeling, Simulation and Research – FM Global. 2024. https://www.fmglobal.com/research-and-resources/research-and-testing/theoretical-computational-and-experimental-research/open-source-fire-modeling
   Google Scholar
• Fukumoto, K., J. X. Wen, M. Li, Y. Ding, and C. Wang. 2020. Numerical simulation of small pool fires incorporating liquid fuel motion. Combust. Flame 213:441–54. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.11.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, W. P., A. J. Marquis, and V. N. Prasad. 2012. LES of a turbulent premixed swirl burner using the Eulerian stochastic field method. Combust. Flame 159 (10):3079–95. The Combustion Institute. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen, B. F., and B. H. Hjertager. 1977. On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. Symp. (Int.) Combust. 16 (1):719–29. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(77)80366-4
   Google Scholar
• Maragkos, G., T. Beji, and B. Merci. 2017. Advances in modelling in CFD simulations of turbulent gaseous pool fires. Combust. Flame 181:22–38. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maragkos, G., T. Beji, and B. Merci. 2019. Towards predictive simulations of gaseous pool fires. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37 (3):3927–34. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maragkos, G., and B. Merci. 2020. On the use of dynamic turbulence modelling in fire applications. Combust. Flame 216:9–23. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maragkos, G., and B. Merci. 2021. Grid insensitive modelling of convective heat transfer fluxes in cfd simulations of medium-scale pool fires. Fire Saf. J. 120 (January 2020):103104. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103104
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, R., K. McGrattan, and J. Floyd. 2011. A simple reaction time scale for under-resolved fire dynamics. Fire Saf. Sci. 10:809–20. doi:10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.10-809
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. E., A. F. Sarofim, and L. A. Clomburg. 1980. Experimental and numerical investigation of confined laminar diffusion flames. Combust. Flame 37:227–44. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(80)90092-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motaghian, S., and T. Beji. 2023a. A laminar smoke point-based soot model considering surface growth and soot reactions. Combust. Theor. Model. 28 (2):172–97. doi:10.1080/13647830.2023.2267526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motaghian, S., and T. Beji. 2023b. Soot modeling in large eddy simulation of turbulent buoyant flames using the laminar smoke point and the eddy dissipation concept. Combust. Sci. Technol. (00):1–22. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/00102202.2023.2284864
   Google Scholar
• OpenFOAM-V2006. 2020. https://www.openfoam.com/news/main-news/openfoam-v20-06
   Google Scholar
• Peters, N. 1984. Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 10 (3):319–39. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/0360-1285(84)90114-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikic, I., S. Dembele, and J. Wen. 2019. Non-grey radiative heat transfer modelling in LES-CFD simulated methanol pool fires. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 234:78–89. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, K. C. 1999. Diffusion flame measurements of species concentrations, soot concentrations, temperature, and velocity. https://www.nist.gov/el/fire-research-division-73300/diffusion-flame-measurements
   Google Scholar
• Sung, C. J., J. B. Liu, and C. King Law. 1995. Structural response of counterflow diffusion flames to strain rate variations. Combust. Flame 102 (4):481–92. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/0010-2180(95)00041-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valiño, L., R. Mustata, and K. Ben Letaief. 2016. Consistent behavior of Eulerian monte carlo fields at low Reynolds numbers. Flow Turbul. Combust. 96 (2):503–12. doi:10.1007/s10494-015-9687-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilfayeau, S., J. P. White, P. B. Sunderland, A. W. Marshall, and A. Trouvé. 2016. Large eddy simulation of flame extinction in a turbulent line fire exposed to air-nitrogen co-flow. Fire Saf. J. 86 (April):16–31. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. J., H. R. Liu, and J. X. Wen. 2018. An improved pasr-based soot model for turbulent fires. Appl. Therm. Eng. 129:1435–46. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., and S. Ho Chung. 2016. Strain rate effect on sooting characteristics in laminar counterflow diffusion flames. Combust. Flame 165:433–44. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar