Front Line Demonstration Program: An Effective Technology Transfer Tool for Adoption of Oilseed Production Technology in Himachal Pradesh, India

References

• Anonymous. 2012. Annual progress report of KVK Sundernagar, India (April 2011 to March 2012). Sundernagar, India: CSK HPKV, KVK Sundernagar.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, S. D., and G. Smith. 1998. Beyond methodologies: Coalition building for participatory technology development. World Development 26:239–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary, A. K. 2009. Role of sulphur in oilseeds and its management. Indian Farmers’ Digest 42 (12): 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, A. K. 2011. Resource conservation technologies under changing climate in NW Himalayas. In Compendium of Summer School on Climate Variability and Its Impact on Crop Production – Physiological Perspective Towards Mitigation Strategies. Jorhat, India: Assam Agricultural University, 199–206.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, A. K., and S. K. Thakur. 2012. Agricultural contingency plan for Mandi District of Himachal Pradesh. In Abstracts of the National Seminar on Indian Agriculture: Present Situation, Challenges, Remedies, and Road Map, vol. I, 59. Palampur, India: CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, A. K., P. S. Negi, D. Badiyala, and C. P. Awasthi. 2001. Effect of fertility levels on quality of Brassica species under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Biochemistry 14 (1–2): 51–53.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, A. K., A. Singh, and D. S. Yadav. 2010. “On-farm testing” of wheat cultivars for site-specific assessment under varied bio-physical regimes in mid-hill conditions of Mandi District of Himachal Pradesh. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development 5 (1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, A. K., A. Singh, A. Singh, D. S. Yadav, and P. Sood. 2010. System of rice intensification: A boon to enhance rice productivity in northwestern Himalayas. In Third International Rice Congress Abstracts, 159. Hanoi, Vietnam: International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Philippines, and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Government of Vietnam.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, A. K., R. C. Thakur, and N. Kumar. 2006. Effect of integrated nutrient management on water use and water-use efficiency in wheat–rice crop sequence in NW Himalayas. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 34 (3): 233–236.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, A. K., S. K. Thakur, and V. K Suri. 2013. Technology transfer model on integrated nutrient management technology for sustainable crop production in high value cash crops and vegetables in NW Himalayas. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 44 (11): 1684–1699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary, A. K., S. K. Thakur, D. S. Yadav, S. Rahi, P. Sood, and K. Arya. 2012. Saviour window programme: An effective technology transfer model for dissemination of generated farm technology on farmers’ fields. In Abstracts of the National Seminar on Indian Agriculture: Present Situation, Challenges, Remedies, and Road Map, vol. 1, 45. Palampur, India: CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, A. K., D. S. Yadav, A. Singh, and A. Singh. 2009. Impact of frontline demonstrations in pulses on technology transfer, productivity, and profitability in Mandi District of Himachal Pradesh. In Fourth World Congress on Conservation Agriculture Abstract, vol. 1, 395. New Delhi, India: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, A. K., D. S. Yadav, and A. Singh. 2009. Technological and extension yield gaps in oilseeds in Mandi District of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 37 (3): 224–229.
   Google Scholar
• Cramb, R. A. 2003. Processes affecting the successful adoption of new technologies by smallholders. In Working with farmers: The key to the adoption of forage technologies, ed. B. Hacker, 11–22. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR).
   Google Scholar
• DOA. 2009. District agriculture plan: Mandi District, Himachal Pradesh, India, vol. 8, 220. Shimla, India: Government of Himachal Pradesh.
   Google Scholar
• Hegde, D. M. 2005. Oilseed scenario in India: Past, present, and future with special reference to rapeseed–mustard. In Compendium of Winter School on Advances in Rapeseed-Mustard Research Technology for Sustainable Production of Oilseeds. New Delhi, India: Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR).
   Google Scholar
• Kadian, K. S., R. Sharma, and A. K. Sharma. 1997. Evaluation of frontline demonstration trials on oilseeds in Kangra Valley of Himachal Pradesh. Annals of Agricultural Research 18 (1): 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, J., V. K. Suri, S. K. Sandal, and A. K. Choudhary. 2011. Evaluation of targeted yield precision model for soybean and toria crops on farmers’ fields under subhumid subtropical NW Himalayas. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42:2452–2460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagar, R. L., and G. Chandra. 2004. Frontline demonstrations on sesame in West Bengal. Agricultural Extension Review 16 (2): 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Samui, S. K., S. Maitra, D. K. Roy, A. K. Mondal, and D. Saha. 2000. Evaluation on frontline demonstration on groundnut. Journal of Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research 18 (2): 180–183.
   Google Scholar
• Suri, V. K., A. K. Choudhary, G. Chander, and T. S. Verma. 2011. Influence of VAM fungi and applied P on root colonization in wheat and plant nutrient dynamics in a P-deficient acid Alfisol of western Himalayas. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42:1177–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaghasia, P. M., R. L. Savalia, and G. R. Kelaiya. 2005. Evaluation of frontline demonstrations on groundnut in Saurashtra region of Gujarat. Journal of Oilseeds Research 22 (1): 238–239.
   Google Scholar
• Vedna, K., A. Kumar, A. Kumar, and S. Bhateria. 2007. Demonstration: An effective tool for increasing the productivity of rapeseed–mustard in Kangra District of Himachal Pradesh. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 33 (2): 257–261.
   Google Scholar